Sentences with phrase «facts did speak»

Wouldn't it be lovely if indeed facts DID speak for themselves?

The facts do speak for themselves, and I somehow doubt that you've actually read them or that you are able to interpret them.

Not exact matches

I think it's a really unfair position to put a CEO in because again it comes back to the fact that he doesn't speak for the entire company in terms of the way everybody believes.

In fact, don't speak about the person who got the promotion at all.

Some people call it a twang, but any Midwesterner will tell you that, despite the fact they draw out their a's, they don't speak with an accent.

«The fact is collusion is just not legal so what we were very, very careful to do was not to speak to each other about what the end result was going to be,» he said.

And we did get some data in the last week or so that really spoke to the fact that inflation is building a little bit.

In fact, he did this himself — he was once terribly afraid of public speaking, so he took a Dale Carnegie course to improve this skill.

This quote by Randy McKay speaks to the fact that trying to pick the top or bottom of a trend is futile, yet many traders try to do it.

Well, when the fact that people didn't have that many of those electric cars out there, mean that there weren't enough of these, there weren't these stations out so he put the charging station before the car so that it would make the car more usable or user - friendly so to speak.

The fact is that the issues you speak of are not because the people are members of the LDS church but in fact this is what happens in any society of humans living as close together as we do in large cities.

Keep in mind that that is a quote from the Bible, not from Pastor Evans... so he is not the one saying it, he's merely quoting what the Bible says of those who don't believe, and to further amplify the quote, it is speaking of people who have denied God in their hearts... the very place where ultimately most people know in fact that there is a God, they just don't want to admit it.

Speaking on Premier's News Hour, Nola Leach said: «I do welcome the fact that in the Queen's Speech they announced measures about age - verification proposals which we've been talking about for a long time.

My original point was simply that to ignore the fact that religion does demand special rights is to continue giving religion that free pass I spoke of which does this country as a whole no good in the long run.

Your words, Mark, at the prayer breakfast were 100 % correct: we do have a responsibility to God to do the best we can do... to make good come of heartache... I challenge people reading this to think of and remember the fact that we are AMERICANS and this nation was founded on the very principles of which Mark spoke: a responsibility within ourselves to our Creator to rise to the occasion and make things better... May we all find that courage to do so!

However, if one were going to attempt to answer the question «Why do some people hate Jews,» a probable answer might have something to do with the fact that one is not permitted to speak of Jews in any way whatsoever without being branded an anti-Semite and shouted down.

using facts and speaking the truth is not a proud look or a lying tongue shedding innocent blood is murder like 21 weeks after the legal limit to abort like Dr. Gosnell did, so my name info is accurate i can back my words with facts, can you?

It is sad that there are so many people that believe the myth of «if this person is speaking from a pulpit, then they are speaking truth» and don't bother to do any fact checking.

In fact it speaks of Christ as much as the Bible does.

The fact that one of your congregation a) was able to articulate such faith and doubt so eloquently; b) felt that he could ask you to share it in a Sunday service and c) that you did so — speaks wonders to me about what your community is about.

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

Do not follow blindly as the bible warns to be mindful of those who say they are speaking for God when in fact they are speaking for themselves.

The cultural perceptions of love speak so loud, in fact, and with such consistency that we would be naive to think we don't enter into romantic relationships with a picture based largely on our surroundings.

I would also acknowledge that Julie speaking up in this forum did in fact mediate several apologies from two or three people who independently gossiped about her.

It forces recognition of the fact that Jesus» teaching did not center around such ideas as the infinite worth of personality, the cultivation of the inner life, the development of man toward an ideal; that Jesus spoke rather of the coming Kingdom of God, which was to be God's gift, not man's achievement, of man's decision for or against the Kingdom, and of the divine demand for obedience.

More to the point, the context speaks about confession of faith and love of one another — are these regulative statements or just as conveniently non-binding on you, someone who clearly does not take much joy in the fact that the bible * instituted * ecclesial offices?

The fact that God does not speak by audible sounds or through «signs and wonders» but through our conscious and subconscious mental life raises another question, more ethical than psychological.

Indeed, he adds, «I do not speak in vanity, but simply record the fact, that I was not unemployed in my profession by the late John Jacob Astor; a name which, I admit, I love to repeat; for it hath a rounded and orbicular sound to it, and rings like unto bullion.»

More important, Fishbane's sensitive account, which does justice to our horror at Abraham's deed, can not handle the manifest fact that the angel speaks for God, Who swears by Himself and Who increases Abraham's blessing as a response to his hearkening to the divine voice.

In fact, epistemologically speaking, it says far more about the worshiper than it ever does about god.

what you just described does in fact support what Dr. Leslie Wickman speaks of as the «outside of this universe» Agent, hence «First Cause» as a Logical Must.

The real issue here is the fact that when speaking about Jeremy Lin or Tim Tebow, you will always hear people say «Oh God is doing divine work in him!

In fact, most of the time Schweitzer could not communicate directly with them at all; since he did not speak any of the half - dozen dialects around Lambaréné What is a theologian to do when he can not speak?

In fact, each of us does not speak one word (Exodus 4:11) or take one single step (Prov 16:1, 16:9) outside of God's will.

It's just incorrect, factually speaking, though I don't expect modern liberal outlets such as CNN or their writers to care about facts or truth.

I speak in generality, Laughing, I don't presume to know you and your pursuit, in fact I will even operate under the assumption based on our discourse that you have done just so!

I beg your pardon, this Pope does not speak for most Catholics, in fact, what Francis speaks of is being questioned even by Priests and Bishops.

In the same way that the Black Lives Matter movement simply seeks to highlight that black lives do, in fact, matter (in a society that mostly acts like this is not the case), feminism is a movement that allows women to speak up about the issues that affect them (in a society that often tries to silence them, as illustrated in my previous points).

In this chapter I have attempted to present an understanding of our human existence which is true to the facts, so far as we know them, which makes sense of and gives sense to our experience, and which indicates what is meant when we speak, as we do, of the worth and value in our lives.

Whatever name we may wish to give this assumption, we all of us do in fact believe in it and we live and act, as we think and speak, in terms of it.

They are frequently spoken of as if they do, but such usage, despite the fact that it will surely continue, I believe to be misleading and in need of qualification.

While god shouldn't have to rely on modern mass communication technology, the fact that he could have spoken to damn near everyone by appearing at center field during the World Cup finals, but didn't and continues not to shows either that god really doesn't care what we believe, is a creepy game player, or, most simply, doesn't exist.

It runs something like this: «What must the truth be for us, if men and women who thought and spoke and wrote like that in their own day expressed its truth in the fashion in which they did in fact do this?»

For all the lectures on human rights and democracy coming out of Manila, the brutal fact of Philippine life is that millions of its people are forced to leave their families to do dirty work elsewhere because they have no way to feed their families — this in a strategically located land with an educated, English - speaking workforce and bursting with natural resources.

The fact is that Bergson does not hesitate to speak of matter as «elementary vibrations, the shortest of which are of very» slight duration, almost vanishing, but not nothing.

But the despairer, as he was depicted in the foregoing, did not observe what was happening behind him, so to speak; he thinks he is in despair over something earthly and constantly talks about what he is in despair over, and yet he is in despair about the eternal; for the fact that he ascribes such great value to the earthly, or, to carry the thought further, that he ascribes to something earthly such great value, or that he first transforms something earthly into everything earthly, and then ascribes to the earthly such great value, is precisely to despair about the eternal.

I notice he did not speak to the fact, that LDS believe that no one but themselfs are going to heaven, hence the special underwear.

These were just misguided ways of speaking, for these speakers didn't realize that they were presupposing the classical view of the future as a domain of settled facts and then denying God knew it.

the Bible does in fact speak of christians performing just that.

He does not... destroy my faith, but he forces me to re-examine my faith and to re-discover its power in the contemporary scene which he seems to understand in clearer terms than I do... The real significance of the sermon lies in the fact that Bishop Pike is aiming to revive the new generation's lagging interest in religion and to have religion speak in terms modern man can understand.»