Sentences with phrase «facts about that form»

Here are some facts about that form and the efforts I have made to supplement it.

Not exact matches

As long as you accept that fact, you can then talk seriously about just what bundle of rights and responsibilities corporations ought to have — that is, what form their personhood should take.

Nor should it blind us to the fact that the GMO category is both over-inclusive and under - inclusive if what you're worried about is potentially - harmful forms of genetic modification.

In fact, we only want one page from you ever, and that's on the signup form for the topic you care most about.

The major problem with this particular practice is the fact that it indicates that the individuals at this brokerage have in one way or another gotten hold of the private information of people who had by no means contacted them, heard about them or showed in any form or manner that they were interested in trading using them.

The Steele dossier, Nunes alleges, «formed an essential part of the Carter Page application,» and he goes on to suggest that the application omitted several key facts about the dossier that undermine its credibility: most notably that the dossier was partially funded by the Democratic National Committee and that Steele himself has expressed his opposition to Donald Trump becoming president.

Using the argument of neutrality is too dismissive to the more pertinent fact at hand — likely about $ 300k was deployed to control $ 1.6 m, to be used in any way shape or form when it is all said and done... retiring abroad, funding their kids college, starting their tube meat meat truck business after they get tired of the lawyering rat race, etc etc..

In fact Eat Stop Eat does not involve binging, guilty feeling about food, or using fasting as a form of punishment.

But when you and I insist on that all - too - comfortable paradigm of cosmic score keeping, we stop talking about Christianity and in fact adopt a Westernized form of Hinduism.

Buddhism (in its true form) provides a guide to the elimination of suffering, not deity worship; in fact never talks about God or gods in the sense the west does... FYI Buddha was born 630 years before Jesus, and it is proven that Buddhism traveled from eastern India all the way to Syria and the Middle East via the Silk Road... i am quite sure Jesus had heard some of his teachings... some of the things that Jesus says are a direct reflection of the eightfold path from buddhism... Jesus was the greatest salesman of all time... sold the most books in history... he really honestly does nt deserve worship but an Academy Award

... no evidence it was, yet there it is... when you look at it, it in fact was not designed, but it was laid down over millions of years... a sedimentary rock... the rock was not designed... maybe the PROCESSES that made the rock were desined... not really... gravity makes water flow into the lowest ares and when the water moves more slowly, sediment is dropped, forming rock... Still not seeing a designer... what about water... simple chmistry there, designed?

Rather, I want to draw attention to the fact that ecumenism can take a number of forms, and that this might well shape how we think about ECT on its twentieth anniversary.

Because the birth control cases all focus on a 1993 federal law, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, not the Constitution, the Justices will face questions about whether the mandate to provide free access to 20 forms of birth control drugs or devices, sterilization, screenings, and counseling imposes a «substantial burden» on religious freedom of nonprofit employers with religious objections to some or all contraceptives, whether the mandate in fact serves a «compelling interest» of the government, and whether an attempt to provide an exemption from the mandate satisfies the requirement that such an accommodation is «the least restrictive means» of achieving the government's policy interest.

In fact, however, as I have indicated, I do not think that the Synoptic traditions should be taken for the most part as factual history, but rather as reflections, cast in narrative form, of the theological thinking of the early Church about the Easter appearances and of various current controversies about them.

Properly speaking, a democratic constitution provides the one set of legal prescriptions that must be explicitly accepted by all citizens as participants in the political discourse, including discourse about whether the actual constitution is in fact democratic and, indeed, whether democracy itself is the proper form of the political association.

In any case it was probably inevitable that Bultmann's pupils (such as Günther Bornkamm)-- while accepting his negative verdicts that Jesus did not think of himself as Messiah, Son of God, or Son of Man — should refuse to accept the dispiriting embargo on all discussion about how Jesus did regard himself, and refuse as well to accept the excessively rigorous skepticism about the facts behind the Gospels» literary forms.

As for email notifications when new comments are added, there is in fact a little check box at the bottom of the comment form for this very thing... I believe that if you check the box to receive updates about comment replies, you should get them....

They don't yet know how the first simplest cells formed, so you are most likely seeing facts about current much more complex cells.

In fact, it is not going too far to say that modern skepticism about heaven typically takes the form of portraying it as a kind of prison.

«His work in philosophy forms part, and a very important part, of the movement of twentieth - century realism; but whereas the other leaders of that movement came to it after a training in late - nineteenth - century idealism, and are consequently realistic with the fanaticism of converts and morbidly terrified of relapsing into the sins of their youth, a fact which gives their work an air of strain, as if they cared less about advancing philosophical knowledge than about proving themselves good enemies of idealism, Whitehead's work is perfectly free from all this sort of thing, and he suffers from no obsessions; obviously he does not care what he says, so long as it is true.

In the first place, the skepticism that has arisen with regard to the accuracy of our information about Jesus is only partly due to the fact that this information is given in the form that it assumed in the church's preaching.

[37] Fletcher explained «Natural selection is in fact a chemical process as well as a biological process, and it was operating for about half a billion years before the earliest cellular life forms appear in the fossil record.»

Of course the FACT terrorist apologists like yourself continue to lie about is that the intelligence community in a virtually universal judgment deemed the threat to be very real in Iraq and the need for war to be so paramount that the coalition formed was historic in their unison.

Nor was it about his redemption of our sins (a theology developed to its current form only centuries after the facts primarily from the epistles of Paul, who never knew or spoke with Jesus personally, in the flesh.)

The discovery of this fact about the Gospels is often popularly attributed to a contemporary school of scholars known as «Form critics,» but the fact was well established long before this particular school emerged and rests upon grounds considerably wider and firmer than those which support this school's particular claims.

And just so you know I 100 % believe adoption is a phenomenal choice, but we aren't just talking about abortions performed as a terrible form of after the fact birth control... We are talking about the abortions performed due to health risks that could cause a severely low quality of life as well.

Analytic philosophy typically assumes that religious language is meaningful only if it makes universally valid statements about matters of fact in the form of propositions.

Nor is it too much to say — in fact, it is saying the same thing — that the configuration of these properties at any given time and place comprises an invisible environment around which we form our ideas about time and space, learning, knowledge, and social relations.

One of the benefits of secularization in this field has been that it has shown up the fact that much that has passed for Christian prayer was in fact a form of magic, by which the Christian was attempting to operate supernatural forces to bring about his own ends, however laudable they might have been.

We must not hide our eyes from the fact that what we have called secularization is an entirely new phenomenon in human history, that it has been brought about by a number of new factors in human knowledge, the more important of which we have looked at, and that for these reasons a secularized culture has come to stay, at least in some form.

Alaso, ArthurP seems to be engaging in a form of personal «transference» by ascribing his own feelings and then «transferring» them to other people who he doesn't know, and then making assumptions about the way things «should be» without asking them, or, in fact, assuming that they were somehow better off killed and then goes on to say things that to a human who is basically coherent, can appear fatalistic and perhaps even suicidal.

It know it will always be hard to describe what exactly you do or exactly who you are, but form the blog and your creative environment and your definitions and words and visuals and job description and personal profile to you (not the other way around), and don't worry about people misunderstanding or misreading or thinking it is something else or expecting something more or less, that will always happen and that very thing, in fact, proves to be the greatest opportunity to learn to communicate better and more clearly (at least for me).

whose aim is not to inform us about what is or ought to be but to offer envisagements of what might be and to fashion symbolic forms to which questions of literal fact are not determining....

The standard account of why song evolved in certain animals is not such an explanation; for my theory is a special form of that standard account, and only what is special about it explains the objective behavioral and environmental facts in question.

At least Ramsey, as reported by The Guardian, the midfielder was sounding upbeat about the chances of the Gunners doing just that, despite the fact that out next opponents are the league leaders Leicester City who are in fine form and are coming to north London having produced a great away display to put another title rival Man City to the sword.

The truth doesn't set you free on Justarsenal lol, you'll state a known fact that Giroud went 15 games without scoring a single goal for Arsenal then someone will use his form France as an argument about his credentials as if his goals for France will somehow contribute to Arsenal winning titles!

In fact, given his preoccupation with abstract form and texture, it might seem that there was no need for Ratcliffe even to bother with tramping about the bush looking for subjects.

The Evening Standard are reporting that Hazard turn of form has made the European champions think twice about whether they want to make a move for him, and that the fact that they currently have Marco Asensio at the club may discourage Los Blancos further from making a move.

BUT what angers me most is the fact that Arsenal is a VERY VERY big club which can easily match them, better them, or even be at par (its not all about the money its also about the manager forming a title winning squad within the available funds), we've seen this at Man U (fergie time), Dortmund, Athletico, etc..

Just worried about Cesc form and comparing with Ozil's form considering the fact that we turned down to sign him for 27 mil.

much like when a country can't divulge highly classified information publicly for obvious economic and military reasons, a professional soccer organization must keep certain things in - house so they don't devalue a player, expose a weakness, provide info that could give an opposing club leverage in future negotiations and / or give them vital intel regarding a future match, but when dishonesty becomes the norm the relationship between cub and fan will surely deteriorate... in our particular case, our club has done an absolutely atrocious job when it comes to cultivating a healthy and honest relationship with the media or their fans, which has contributed greatly to our lack of success in the transfer market... along with poor decisions involving weekly wages, we can't ever seem to get true market value for most of our outgoing players and other teams seem to squeeze every last cent out of us when we are looking to buy; why wouldn't they, when you go to the table with such a openly desperate and dysfunctional team like ours, you have all the leverage; made even worse by the fact that who wouldn't want to see our incredibly arrogant and thrifty manager squirm during the process... the real issue at this club is respect, a word that appears to be entirely lost on those within our hierarchy... this is the starting point from which all great relationships between club and supporters form... this doesn't mean that a team can't make mistakes along the way, that's just human nature, it's about how they chose to deal with these situations that will determine if this relationship flourishes or devolves..

we all know we eont make top 4, well all apart form the little ray of delusional sunshine Sam P. in fact we can forget winning any decent trophy until the club has a massive clearout inc the board / wenger / fans who keep harping on about the past

The worst thing about the draw, in my opinion, is the fact that we have to play away but here come the positives: First of all the Gunners seem to be playing well and hitting form and after the way we played away to beat Man City recently we should have no real fear.

Everyone keeps talking about our fantastic home form this season, but seem to have completely overlooked the fact that we haven't actually played anyone good at home!

There's nothing we can do about the injuries, so let's celebrate the fact we have three really good midfielders for once: Sergio Busquets, Andrés Iniesta and Paulinho -LRB-!!!!!!!!!!) are in great form at the moment, and Ivan Rakitic had a very encouraging performance against Deportivo La Coruña.

I agree with you about support taking on many different forms and in fact you reminded me that I forgot to link to another post of mine on that topic in this post.

It is about the simple fact that the number should have been there for us to see and form conclusions about.

It's about time someone sorted the fact form the fiction in this area.

In fact, if you are interested, you can find information here about joining our team and we have a form for guest post submissions.

In fact, you'll need about 300 more calories (2,000 - 2,300 calories total) per day than in the last trimester of your pregnancy in the form of three balanced meals and some light snacks throughout the day.