«What the World Thinks about Climate Change in 7 Charts» is a good place to get some key
facts about the global issues.
Not exact matches
Handle: @Ariannahuff Sure, Huffington's job is to share news, but she'll engage you with huge
global issues and intriguing
facts about sleep and power.
I really don't see what he gains from being indifferent and idiotic
about the
issue, but for the mere
fact he can't make up his mind whether humans are a cause behind
global climate changes makes me think this guy isn't fit to run the country.
Peter Singer was talking
about the
fact that we can often look at
issues of
global poverty or
global warming, we can look at those as technological
issues or such policy
issues.
Which in
fact makes me think of the
issue raised by some skeptics
about our ability to reliably detect
global temperature changes of tenths of a degree in the past century.
4) Some say that whatever you think
about the dangers of
global warming, this kind of language inevitably becomes the
issue, distracts from the real questions, and could in
fact further polarize or paralyze discourse.
At the root of all of those reasons is the
fact that
global warming was effectively massaged into an
issue that could be ignored, by some very determined people funded by some very rich corporations — all of whom have worked for years to manufacture doubt
about climate science.
The debate is sort of encapsulated in two quotes: One is Robert Kennedy Jr. saying that if people only had the
facts about global warming and understood how urgent this
issue was, then they would take action, the right policies would come up and people would support the right candidates.
If the company later contradicted warnings
about global warming
issued by scientists it funded in the 1980s, that would be justified by the
fact that those warnings were almost certainly wrong.
This collegiate grassroots campaign is meant to increase awareness
about climate change
issues, and give college students the
facts they need to intelligently debate man made
global warming advocates.»
Its supplemental online interview of the late IPCC scientist Dr Stephen Schneider quoted his opinion
about the
Global Climate Coalition as being «a coalition of liars and spin doctors to reposition the debate onto the issue of uncertainty, way beyond [what] the scientific community agreed with» (he probably meant to say it was the Western Fuels Association, out to «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact», an error I note at item 17
Global Climate Coalition as being «a coalition of liars and spin doctors to reposition the debate onto the
issue of uncertainty, way beyond [what] the scientific community agreed with» (he probably meant to say it was the Western Fuels Association, out to «reposition
global warming as theory rather than fact», an error I note at item 17
global warming as theory rather than
fact», an error I note at item 17 here).
I've never really known which way to go on this whole
issue of
global warming but the
fact that all the liberal loonies in the far left latched on to it years ago and made it one of their top priorities has made me very suspect
about the data they cite.
In
fact, I don't think I have much to argue
about your initial post but it does relate directly to the famous
issue of the 40s - 70s
global cooling, and the alleged aerosols explanation.
Party members are in
fact divided
about the
issue of climate change, a new study based on three years of data from the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication finds, with 44 percent ready to admit that
global warming is happening.
Produced by CFACT and CDR Communications in the one - of - a-kind entertaining and informative style that has made CFACT's award - winning ClimateDepot.com one of the world's most sought after sources for reliable, hard - to - find
facts about climate
issues, this groundbreaking film tears the cover off of
global warming hype, and exposes the myths and exaggerations of this multi-billion dollar
issue.