This goes to show you that when you put logic, science, and
facts against religion, religion falls apart.
Not exact matches
However, You hve not posted a single valid point
against the
fact that
religion does have value.
In
fact, the oppression of some Christian governments
against rival sects of Christians is the entire reason our founding fathers built our government to be secular, with no authority on religious matters, with no voice over the
religion of its citizens, and guaranteed to all the freedom to worship, or not, as their conscious dictates.
But that this should be interpreted as freedom from
religion, and used as a means of sealing our culture
against the imparting of religious knowledge, has no justification in
fact.
How can we believe at all
against the
fact that historically our
religion has functioned as an opiate for the oppressed and that it is, as a cultural phenomenon, neither appreciably better nor essentially worse than any other
religion?
everything in the universe evolves, not only life forms but also memes,
Religion is a meme so it also change in conformity to its era or time of its conception as faith.Because in pre scientific times thousands of years ago, the scientific method of approach or philosophy has not existed yet, myth or merely story telling is considered
facts, The first
religion called animism more than 10,000 years ago believed that spirits or god exists in trees, rivers, mountains, boulders or in any places people at that time considered holy.hundreds of them, then when the Greeks and Romans came, it was reduced to 12, they called it polytheism, when the Jews arrived, it was further reduced to 1, monotheism.its derivatives, Christianity And Islam and later hundreds of denominations that includes Mormonism and Protestants flourished up to today.So in short this
religions evolved in accordance to the scientific knowledge of the age or era they existed.If you graph the growth of knowledge, it shows a sharp increase in the last 500 years, forcing the dominant
religions at that time to reinterprete their dogmas, today this traditional
religions are becoming obsolete and has to evolve to survive.But first they have to unify
against atheism.in the dialectical process of change, Theism in one hand and the opposing force atheism in the other, will resolve into a result or synthesis.The process shall be highlighted in the internet in the near future.
The philosophical «God» is understood, if not independently of religious intuition, then definitely beyond its singular appearance (RM 88) 43 Over
against the philosophical approach, Christianity developed the double strategy which we have analyzed as «religious intuition» contributing finally to the formation of revelational theology:» (1) Christianity proceeded not from any metaphysics, but it «has always been a
religion seeking a metaphysics» (RM 50).45 Christianity strove for theological rationalization, 46 (2) Christianity, however, did not follow any certain metaphysics (PR 66 - 68), but «has been true to its genius for keeping its metaphysics subordinate to the religious
fact to which it appeals» (RM 69).
Those people, themselves would disagree with you... and, if one looks at the history of your
religion, in commiting violence
against the non-Muslim innocent, they are, in
fact, immitating the conduct of your
religion's founder, Mohammed.
Many X-tians and, in
fact, a lot of organized
religions promote this kind of anger / hatred / whatever - you - want - to - call - it tacitly simply by defining everyone who isn't with you as
against you.
It's a great stretch to state that we've learned religious
facts to argue
against religion.
The
fact that members of this
religion stood up and spoke out
against this policy would indicate something to someone with any real intelligence.
In
fact, despite the undisguised Hindu nationalist bent of the government, Pew rates India's social hostilities
against religion as more intense than government restrictions.
2) every
religion would have to placed
against known
facts of the universe, it would be a class strictly pointing out the failings of
religion and end up raising more problems than answers.
In
fact, if you read, this perfect man was also
against religion.
its 1 thing 2 b gay and hide it its another 2 speak evil about being gay and its another 2 conceal the
fact u r gay own up u crook eddie long is a closet gay man that goes
against his beliefs its a money grab from people who believe in god and
religion
Granted all that is to be said
against the type of
religion that is popularly presented in our day, the
fact remains that what we need most is more
religion of a better kind.
The
facts and history is VERY clear... Islam isn't a peaceful
religion; it is a declaration of war
against all mankind.
In the previous episode, we really only saw that Moses was in
fact writing a polemic
against the gods of these other
religions and cultures.
The ironic thing is that these anarchists and hippies wear his likeness as a statement of their rebellion when, in
fact, he was
against freedom of
religion or speech.
He said: «These are basic crimes
against individual human beings and I think what we must call out is the
fact that no
religion and no social code should be allowed to disguise the
fact that these are crimes.»
The
fact that this is the only
religion where you have to issue an edict
against «killing humans» says volumes about Islam.
I have nothing
against your
religion as it relates to treating people kindly, which I know it does in
fact promote.
It wouldn't matter what the mandate was about, the
fact is that for the first time in American history, the government is forcing
religions to go
against it's own faith.
«This has nothing to do with
religion but with the
fact that Romney is only recently pro-life and only recently able to articulate an argument
against same - sex marriage,» said Richard Land, the public policy chief at the Southern Baptist Convention, the nation's largest evangelical denomination.
Bryan believed in separation of church and state, but, according to Ashby, he felt such stories of lost faith indicated «that the state was in
fact teaching
against religion, and that atheists and evolutionists were enjoying something
against which democratic reformers had long battled - special privileges.»
But it has nothing to do with the
fact that I am scared, scarred, nervous, or because it is «
against my
religion».
Richard, if you have such an high IQ, then why are you denying the
fact that there is a large numbers of atheists people on CNN comment boards babbling their mouths
against religion.
It is, therefore wrong for anyone to claim that some of the incidents are motivated by
religion, ethnicity, tribalism and elitism when we are living witnesses to the
fact that Sheik Ibrahim El - Zakzaky of Islamic Movement of Nigeria and Sambo Dasuki, the former National Security Adviser are both Muslims and Northerners, who have been in detention for more than two years
against all conventional laws and court orders.
While they believe, in theory, there ought to be vouchers, that parental choice is a good idea, that there has been discrimination
against religion, they're perfectly cognizant of the
fact that many voucher advocates are really less concerned with the well being of religious education as they are with dismantling, disestablishing, literally, the public schools from their preferred place in American life.
ECOA prohibits lenders from discriminating
against credit applicants on the basis of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age, the
fact that all or part of the applicant's income comes from any public assistance program, or the
fact that the applicant has exercised any right under any federal consumer credit protection law.
The Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) prohibits creditors from discriminating
against credit applicants in any aspect of a credit transactions on the basis of race, color,
religion, national origin, sex or marital status, or age; the
fact that all or part of the applicant's income comes from any public assistance program; or the
fact that the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under certain federal consumer credit protection laws.
In
fact, the idea is to convene a meeting with the religious leaders of the main
religions to make all people aware of the state of our climate and the tragedy of social exclusion starting from the biblical message that man is the steward of nature and of its environmental and human development according to its potential and not
against it, as Paul IV intended.
The
fact that section 365 is overwhelmingly deployed
against women also suggests intersecting discrimination on the basis of sex and
religion in the application of section 365.