Sentences with phrase «facts and evidence for»

@Joxer: There are concrete facts and evidence for science.

A theory is simply the best possible assemblage of the facts and evidence for which no facts or evidence can be demonstrated to disagree.

Not exact matches

It provides concrete, factual evidence showing your idea for a business is in fact sound and reasonable and has every chance of success.

The facts: Trump offered no further details or evidence for his claim that «millions of jobs» were created, and nothing happened during his trip that could come close to backing up such an assertion.

If you need evidence of this fact, consider China's massive state mining operations and stake in Bitcoin, undeniably viewed as a tool for leverage on a global scale.

The fact that all these supposed creations have been spotted (and then debunked) in Martian rock formations has done nothing to cool the Internet's ardor for seeing evidence of intelligent life on the red planet.

«Although the Government points to the fact that Congress and the Executive identified the seven countries named in the Executive Order as countries of concern in 2015 and 2016, the Government has not offered any evidence or even an explanation of how the national security concerns that justified those designations, which triggered visa requirements, can be extrapolated to justify an urgent need for the Executive Order to be immediately reinstated,» the judges wrote.

Terry: The Western Australian education system is very good, evidenced by the mere fact that when you get to university level, there is strong demand for private clients to access our education and as we all know, the education sector is Australia's third largest export.

«We are doing what journalists throughout said mainstream media are supposed to do: challenge the conventional wisdom, hold politicians» feet to the fire, ask tough questions, report facts that are in many cases inconvenient truths for career politicians, and give a voice to the millions of people worldwide who have had theirs taken away from them by world elites who consider the ordinary person beneath them,» Boyle said, pointing to Breitbart's record July traffic as evidence Americans «hunger for something different.»

I don't have a ton of empirical evidence for that last point, other than the fact that hedge fund managers get paid a lot, and there is therefore no obvious lack of incentives to manage a hedge fund.

All three of these reasons — evidence that U.S. monetary policy is currently only moderately accommodative, the fact that U.S. financial conditions have been influenced by economic and financial market developments abroad, and risk management considerations — argue, at the moment, for caution in raising U.S. short - term interest rates.

This week, Mr. Trump and his allies seized on the fact that Democrats had paid the firm for the research as evidence that the dossier was part of a political smear campaign.

Binary Options Robot really puts the trader in the first place, and evidence for this can be found in the fact that it is completely free of charge.

Do you know the mathematical impossibility that even one of these could randomly come into existance?Let alone all of the building blocks required for just a single simple cell to come together to form any type of living thing?There sure should be some blobs of fossilized transitions if evolution could happen.You people are real smart why don't you quit bashing Christians and quit believing the garbage you have been fed, and look up the evidence put forth by the Creation Research people.They have in fact proven creation down to a cellular level.Unlike evolution scientists who have no answers, but cleverly devised fables.Evolution is not even a very good fairy tale.Even if I didn't believe in God, Evolution is such a fools explanation of the origin of man that it takes just that to even consider it true.I understand though that you athiests will believe anything that allows you to love your sin and hatred of the one true God.

Science can only be used as evidence for that which exists if people are willing to believe in facts, and are willing to have their understandings shaped and nuanced and developed — yes, even changed — as science reveals more and more intricate information.

For me, the evidence from DNA makes a strong case for the theory, but I also recognize the fact, as with «creationism», that a certain degree of speculation and conjecture is involvFor me, the evidence from DNA makes a strong case for the theory, but I also recognize the fact, as with «creationism», that a certain degree of speculation and conjecture is involvfor the theory, but I also recognize the fact, as with «creationism», that a certain degree of speculation and conjecture is involved.

For example, there is certainly not more evidence for creation and evolution is a fact at this point because the evidence is so overwhelming (genetic evidence is so strong, fossils are no longer even needeFor example, there is certainly not more evidence for creation and evolution is a fact at this point because the evidence is so overwhelming (genetic evidence is so strong, fossils are no longer even needefor creation and evolution is a fact at this point because the evidence is so overwhelming (genetic evidence is so strong, fossils are no longer even needed).

ie: gravity... So, where is the evidence, and facts for intelligent design?

(2) Provide a basis for the belief in evidence, fact, the 5 - senses, and logic.

Thomas was looking for empirical data: facts, hard and sure evidence, measurable and quantifiable, upon which he could base his decision as to whether or not to believe in Jesus» resurrection.

@flash Millions of people over thousands of years give witness to the Truth!I'll go with the numbers, thank you, sufficient evidence or proof for all but you, and a few additional self deluded.You have no position and no authority, in short the facts remain you have lied to yourself and are trying to drag civilization down with you.You are exposed as a fraud and a liar and will stand before God as such unless you change.God bless

Case in point: They believe in ID despite the fact that not one, single piece of evidence has been found in support of it, and not one single experiment has provided any proof for it.

Further evidence that Graber's volume was worthy of notice might be found in the fact that her book was the first selection in the re-launched Princeton Series of Contemporary Poets and — as one reader reminded us — a nominee for a National Book Award.

As for science eventually the same bodies of evidence would arise to form the same theories and facts as before.

The similarity ends with the way of phrasing it however, because I «believe» in evidence, not in something like «faith» (or «brainwashing» I would say) for which there is no evidence, and in fact there is MUCH EVIDENCE to conclude «faith» is a form of mental evidence, not in something like «faith» (or «brainwashing» I would say) for which there is no evidence, and in fact there is MUCH EVIDENCE to conclude «faith» is a form of mental evidence, and in fact there is MUCH EVIDENCE to conclude «faith» is a form of mental EVIDENCE to conclude «faith» is a form of mental illness.

I would «base [my] info on inre the non-existence of God, heaven and hell, etc» on the absolute lack of even a shred of hard verifiable evidence for these extraordinary claims, and the fact that even after thousands of years of frantic and determined efforts by the most ardent and intelligent proponents of these claims, they still have been completely unable to demonstrate them in any testable manner.

Regarding evolution the fact (Primewonk's definition) and evolution the scientific theory (the well - tested and validated explanation for extant and extinct biodiversity stemming from physical evidence from every relevant scientific discipline), they stand on their own evidence regardless of how exactly the first replicators appeared.

[26] K. Miller, Finding Darwin's God: A. Scientist's Search for Common Ground Between God and Evolution (New York: HarperColliins, 1999), 53f, distinguishes the «fact» of evolution, grounded on so much evidence, from various theories of evolution.

The Church opposed this development but also highlighted the problems that could be faced by Catholic adoption agencies that would want to follow the Church's understanding (and in fact that confirmed by sociological evidence) that married couples present the best environment for raising children.

But with the resurrection of Jesus, while we have witnesses and the documents they wrote, it is not so much what they say that convinces us of the historical fact of the resurrection, but the simple fact that such witnesses and documents actually exist which provides the greatest evidence for the resurrection.

Although I have my personal belief regarding these things here, as long as I can not offer watertight Scriptural evidence for my confidence, I can only copy and paste some verses which could point to the fact that God meets every human being twice or even three times during his lifetime in order to show him the way he should go and to bring him to repentance.

Newman goes on to argue that claiming that faith must always proceed works in living the Christian life is «mistaking a following in order of conception for a following in order of time...» In fact, he writes, our works are «the concomitant development and evidence, and instrumental cause, as well as the subsequent result of faith.»

There is no evidence the disciples profited from their evangelistic efforts and in fact Paul incurred many afflictions for the resurrected Christ.

I made an illusion to the fact that there are other things that obviously exist without evidence to others and asked for him to prove his point.

In fact, much evidence for other species have been found, and it is extraordinarily difficult to find because you can't just look up in the sky at something that still exists in order to find proof, you have to go carefully digging all over the world for stuff that has for the most part been buried, destroyed, decayed, etc..

How can someone be a scientist and ignore the evidence for these facts?

In fact, the internal evidence in that Bible book shows that the word «day» is, in fact, an indeterminate period of time allowing for the millions / billions of years that facts show the earth and the universe have been in existence.

Moreover, I believe in its truth; I consider the fact that it contains in its ranks a great number of sinners, of «the maimed, and the halt, and the blind», to be evidence of this truths But this does not cause me to believe that the eager multitude crying out today for guidance is in search of any Shepherd other than He who has already brought it bread.

For example, against both dualism and reductionistic determinism and in favor of the pancreationist, panexperientialist view that the actual world is made up exhaustively of partially self - determining, experiencing events, there is considerable evidence, such as the fact that a lack of complete determinism seems to hold even at the most elementary level of nature; that bacteria seem to make decisions based upon memory; that there appears to be no place to draw an absolute line between living and nonliving things, and between experiencing and nonexperiencing ones; and that physics shows nature to be most fundamentally a complex of events (not of enduring substances).

Due to the fact that we can't prove god does not exist merely means we see no evidence for one and therefore, don't believe one exists.

And yet this dead revolutionary inspired monotheistic Jews to believe that he was God and worthy of worship - so much so that they were willing to die for a historical fact that would have been easy to disprove (note that Crossan needs the dogs to leave no evidence of the body as welAnd yet this dead revolutionary inspired monotheistic Jews to believe that he was God and worthy of worship - so much so that they were willing to die for a historical fact that would have been easy to disprove (note that Crossan needs the dogs to leave no evidence of the body as weland worthy of worship - so much so that they were willing to die for a historical fact that would have been easy to disprove (note that Crossan needs the dogs to leave no evidence of the body as well).

Of course you... he makes no sense but nor does the book you two think has facts, so it would be natural for two of the same ilk to deny evidence based facts and accept fairy tales as fact.

To do that we have to establish a way to prove an assumption by: 1) asserting a hypothesis and its components 2) testing the components for substantial supporting evidence, unsupported components go back to be refined 3) either agree after successful testing that in our shared reality the hypothesis is now supported, or that overall unsupported components may mean the hypothesis fails 4) for sake of ease many people call these tested and supported hypotheses «facts», but again that's just so that we can get on with progress.

It has also generally required that they show evidence of the fact that they have been chosen for the task by the divine bestowal upon them, through birth and experience, of the intellectual, moral, physical and psychological gifts necessary for the work of the ministry.

First, there are two «sources» for theological evidence (the Christian fact and common human experience).

It may not have much value as evidence for the facts of the life of Jesus, but it is at any rate undeniable first - hand evidence for the faith of the early church, and this is well worth studying.

Add in the fact that evidence for Jesus (and most biblical characters and events) is non existent in the historic record.

I wonder how Romney reconciles his complete lack of regard for his fellow man (as evidenced by the fact that his only business strategy is to buy struggling companies, fire everyone, and sell whatever is left for a marginal profit) to Christ's teachings.

In fact, there is a case for saying that the zeal with which ID is attacked by materialist scientists and philosophers is, arguably, evidence of its explanatory force and the threat it poses to the materialist orthodoxy.

Some evidence for this exists in the extremely low birth rate among more secularized Jews, their high intermarriage rate, and the fact that they are much more likely to convert to other religions than are religious Jews.