Sentences with phrase «facts as the negligence»

The Appeals Court noted plaintiff's claims for negligence and for informed consent were based on the same facts, and held there can not be a second cause of action of informed consent based upon the same facts as negligence for failure to diagnose and treat.
Courts in other jurisdictions have precluded claims for informed consent based on the same facts as the negligence claims for failure to diagnose.

Not exact matches

On this note negligence would include any acts of bravado, or in fact anything that was not as precisely required by either the teacher himself or herself or the responsible leader of the activity.
(2) Exceptionally, a plaintiff may succeed by showing that the defendant's conduct materially contributed to risk of the plaintiff's injury, where (a) the plaintiff has established that her loss would not have occurred «but for» the negligence of two or more tortfeasors, each possibly in fact responsible for the loss; and (b) the plaintiff, through no fault of her own, is unable to show that any one of the possible tortfeasors in fact was the necessary or «but for» cause of her injury, because each can point to one another as the possible «but for» cause of the injury, defeating a finding of causation on a balance of probabilities against anyone.
In fact, if you become disabled as a result of someone else's negligence, resulting damages could include the total loss of your ability to work and earn a living to support yourself.
In the absence of expert testimony, there was no triable issue of material fact as to whether a defect in the speed control deactivation switch installed on a pickup truck was the proximate cause of a fire that damaged a brake shop, a federal court in Mississippi ruled, granting the pickup truck maker's motions for summary judgment on the business owner's products liability and negligence claims (the latter of which was subsumed by the products liability claim), and on the punitive damages claim (Mildemont, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., January 13, 2017, Ozerden, H.).
Family law is a unique species of civil law for many reasons, but primarily because of: the frequency with which disputes brought to court concern social, psychological and emotional issues rather than legal; the almost complete absence of circumstances in which a specific legal conclusion invariably and inevitably results from a particular set of facts; and, the range of other areas of the law that may be concurrently applicable, such as contracts, tax, conflicts, real property, negligence, torts and trusts.
In fact many lawyers offer free downloads of articles and even books they have written to help you learn more about what you should do if you have an injury as a result of the fault - negligence of another.
If you have suffered a job site injury as a result of the negligence of a third party, you may have a job site accident claim and you will need an experienced attorney to evaluate the facts of your case.
As a result, the court found that negligence claims would also involve individual findings of fact for each of the class members.
Despite the fact that motorcyclists face greater physical risks than other drivers, bikers have the same entitlements as other motorists, and this includes the right to pursue legal action if they are harmed in an accident that is the direct result of another person's negligence.
The conclusions reached by the CJEU in Paul and others were also not applicable to the circumstances of the case, as the facts differed in that case insofar as Paul concerned the extent of the liability of German authorities as a result of their negligence in the conduct of supervision of banks rather than the establishment of that liability (para 179).
(Note: Insurance adjusters and defense lawyers know that the rear driver is presumed to be at fault under Florida's negligence law, but may not explain this fact to the accident victim, as they have no duty to do so.
Therefore, the court found, when the evidence was viewed in favor of the plaintiff, there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the defendant driver failed to exercise ordinary care (the standard for Georgia ordinary negligence cases) in parking his truck in front of his home and was therefore potentially negligent.
We not only work toward proving the facts indicating the truck driver's negligence, but we also consider such possibilities as negligent road design or defects in the components of either vehicle.
You're in fact entitled to lots of kinds of compensation from an injury caused by another individual's negligence — damages such as pain, psychological, and potential earnings.
The laws of negligence are not always as straightforward as they may seem, and if you have recently been involved in an accident, the best thing to do is to contact an Indiana personal injury law firm to discuss the facts of your specific case.
In fact, personal injury need not refer to a physical injury, but rather encompasses all types of harm a person could suffer as a result of negligence or intentional conduct by another person or entity, such as a corporation or employer.
The fact that a pre-existing condition, such as depression and prior anxiety, could have made the claimant more vulnerable to sustaining the injury caused by the defendant's negligence will not serve to reduce the damage award.
As a result, whether or not negligence occurred is a fact - specific issue that requires a close analysis of the circumstances under which a particular accident took place.
(think about it, what purpose would be served in punishing the innocent party's insurance company) Therefore, the correct strategy is not not seek punitive damages in Georgia and to instead get the alcohol facts into evidence as part of the prima facie case for negligence.
Had the public chosen to march in the streets (as unlikely as that would be), they might have missed the obvious fact: our client was free from negligence and deserved a significant compensation.
When patients make claims of negligence the process of discovering whether negligence occurred requires investigating medical records, interviewing the involved parties (through sworn depositions), finding experts, sorting out conflicts between the opinions of experts, reinvestigating the records and testimony as new insights are uncovered and then reaching some kind of consensus, if possible, about what actually occurred and whether those facts meet the definition of legal negligence.
In coming to his decision that the accountant and the firm were, in fact, liable in negligence, Handrigan J. applied the Anns test, taking into consideration the Canadian application of that test in cases such as Kamloops (City of) v. Nielsen, Hill v. Hamilton - Wentworth (Regional Municipality) Police Services Board, and Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse.
A better fact pattern for negligence claim would be something like this: the bank where you had a safe deposit box left the safe door open and the keys to your box in an easily to see cork board by its door, meanwhile the employees of the bank all left on their lunch break at the same time and forgot to lock the bank's front door when they left, and as a result, someone stole something out of your safe deposit box.
The respondents argued that the mere fact Ms. Wormald participated as a passenger in the «joy ride» should result in a finding of contributory negligence because she failed to take due care.
Although a significant part of the plaintiff's claim rests on the fact that Mazda failed to adequately resolve the issue in a timely fashion, as Glaspell notes above it requires a burden even beyond that of negligence in showing fraud or total failure of consideration.
For example, while ordinary medical mistakes by a medical doctor such as confusing two drugs with similar names or putting the decimal point in a prescription dosage, causing harm to a patient, would not ordinarily result in criminal liability, coming into an operating room while too drunk to drive and without reviewing which limb of a patient needs to be amputated despite a clear indication in marker on the leg of a patient showing that fact, might constitute criminal negligence on the part of a medical doctor.
In fact Donoghue did not open the floodgates for many decades as judges applied the notion of negligence appropriately.
The trustees» subsequent discovery of the unlawfulness of the transfers was treated by the judge — applying Bradstock Trustee Services Ltd v Nabarro Nathanson (a firm)[1995] 4 All ER 888 with the apparent assistance of a concession by the claimant's counsel — as the discovery that the facts which they already knew gave rise to a negligence claim and that, by virtue of LA 1980, s 14A (9), this is excluded from the definition of knowledge required for the occurrence of the starting date under LA 1980, s 14A.
$ 400,000 is a significant amount of money, and if the fire was, in fact, cause by negligence as appears likely, the negligent party will be expected to make good on those damages as well as to make themselves whole again.
There are the traditional reasons such as the common misconception among tenants that you're responsible for their personal property and the fact that their policy would respond to a fire caused by tenant negligence.
The appellate court concluded that summary judgment on the negligence claim was improper because disputed facts had to be determined, such as what the licensee knew at the time and to what extent he participated in the actions at issue.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z