FN4 AAR argues that notwithstanding the statute's explicit saving of contract claims, courts have stated that «common law claims» arising out of the same operative
facts as a trade secret claims are preempted, and that contract claims are common law claims, so contract claims must be preempted.
Not exact matches
The growth of biological knowledge is producing scientific
facts that contradict the evolutionary theory, not confirm it, a
fact that famous Prof. Steven Jay Gould of Harvard has described
as «the
trade secret of paleontology.»
But
as with all debates, more
facts & figures would hopefully help direct and / or settle the argument — so it's clearly incumbent on the board to provide even more info / disclosure to shareholders (no
trade secrets here!?)
In this separate trial they wouldn't be able to use the
fact that you pleaded guilty to theft of
trade secrets since it wouldn't be relevant and your previous bad acts can't generally be used
as evidence against you.
Business tort claims include legal disputes focused on misappropriation of
trade secrets, for instance,
as well
as conversion of property, negligent misrepresentation of
facts, and tortious interference with contract or business relationships.