Sentences with phrase «facts hold up in court»

So if all the facts hold up in court, it would appear Sallie Mae suckered some students into loans that were entirely risky and then went on to provide servicing that maximized collections and they had no duty to provide good advice to assist students find better repayment solutions and options.

Not exact matches

Despite the fact that, by virtue of being a woman she would have been considered an unreliable witness whose testimony wouldn't hold up in court, Mary Magdalene is charged with telling the world that Jesus Christ rose from the dead.

She is lying and holding up a few churches and saying many there are no proliferation of churches flocking to approve gay marriage and in fact are running the other way like when the Pres made health care mandatory and churches are being forced to provided birth control but are now fighting it in court.

'' For me, I strongly hold the view that there is no dispute on the relevant / essential facts grating the claims of the appellants which relate to the determination of the action of the 1st respondent in setting up a caretaker committee of the PDP, Anambra State chapter during the pendency of the judgment / order of the Federal High Court, recognizing the appellants as the persons duly elected to that position.

We're not lawyers, we we don't know if this would hold up in a court of law but regardless of that fact is that the website does confess that they are responsible for the use of fake profiles!

As a matter of fact, training without evidence of comprehension might not hold up in court should an issue ever reach that point.

As regards rectification, the Court of Appeal held that the judge had been wrong on the facts to hold that there was convincing proof that the relevant common intention continued up to the grant of the lease in question, and so allowed the appeal on this point.

In applying the criteria laid out by the Court, the AG pays little attention to the fact that the tribunals are set up by an international agreement rather than through domestic law, to the ad - hoc nature of ISDS, and to the long - held criticism that ISDS arbitrators lack the basic judicial safeguards for judicial independence.

The High Court held that, on the facts, the changes to the facility agreements (extending the term of the loan and rolling up the interest) were within the scope of the indulgence clause in the guarantee.

As reported in this post from yesterday, and as explained a bit more via this write - up I provided to the fine folks at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court yesterday in Dean v. United States, No. 15 - 9260 (April 3, 2017)(available here) ruled that the Eighth Circuit had been wrong to hold that, «in calculating the sentence for [a] predicate offense, a judge must ignore the fact that the defendant will serve the mandatory minimums imposed under § 924 (c).»

So one of the fundamental principles that the Democrats base their support for this disallowance motion on is the fact that the State regimes are based on legislation which, at the end of the day, will not hold up», Senator Woodley as reported in Senate 2000, Debates, No. 16, p19520 The speaker from the Greens party said «I will be voting for this disallowance because the regulations brought forward from Western Australian legislation do not uphold the spirit of the legislation that has gone through this parliament in the last decade of the High Court rulings that Indigenous people should have a real say in what is happening on their land», Senator Brown as reported in Senate 2000, Debates, No. 16, p19524

I would submit that this form is most valuable to lawyers who end up litigating on behalf of litigants claiming damages or defending their positions against same based upon not only dishonest and misleading statements that most assuredly appear on these SPIS smooth deal - facilitator documents, but also upon assumed honestly held but nevertheless misleading statements (the seller «thinks» he / she knows the correct answer to a question, but in fact does «not» know for sure, and guesses... yes... or no) that can ultimately lead to an expensive court case.