Sentences with phrase «facts of reality do»

The results of experiments and facts of reality don't matter, as a god is compatible with any possible configuration.

Not exact matches

I suffered because I didn't prepare for the fact that power failure was a reality of the environment I was in.

Don't wallow in the fear, instead learn all of the facts about the situation so you can deal with it based on reality.

It didn't take Oliver long to get the hang of the Harper government's style — shaping reality according to Conservative ideology, with a careless disregard for the facts.

In one of her speeches O'Connor does not mince words: «when the physical fact is separated from the spiritual reality,» she writes, «the dissolution of belief is eventually inevitable.»

The philosopher does not start from a faith in being's intelligible disclosure of itself — in fact, he starts by explicitly abjuring such faith — but rather vests his trust in the power of the self to posit reality from its own unshakeable position.

Check out this link to find out about marriage to young girls claim.Very very interesting to know.I hope everyone has the patience to study history and reality of life centuries ago worldwide.This video also gives you references to online history books about facts it says.Simply, the average age of marriage was very young worldwide including church approved age of consent to marry.What Mohamed did, was very common back in the days and just to let you know, that girl was engaged to another man and then the engagement was broken due to his disbelief which tells you that that was common back in the days.Also, the age of 6 mentioned was age of engagement not age of marriage.marriage happened a few years later.

Of course I do understand that Kermit is NOT MISSING THE POINT... Kermit is not interested in the point... the saying is... MY MIND IS MADE UP DO N'T CONFUSE ME WITH FACTS... that's how many people live... in an altered realitdo understand that Kermit is NOT MISSING THE POINT... Kermit is not interested in the point... the saying is... MY MIND IS MADE UP DO N'T CONFUSE ME WITH FACTS... that's how many people live... in an altered realitDO N'T CONFUSE ME WITH FACTS... that's how many people live... in an altered reality.

What does in fact appear is the new reality in the physical satisfaction of the concrescent occasion; but in the early phases it has not completely appeared and is therefore only mere appearance.

You would think it would be a hard sell given the fact that the real estate mogul and reality star has boasted about his extramarital affairs, profited off casinos and strip clubs, said he doesn't need to ask God for forgiveness, called for targeting innocent civilians in war, mocked a reporter with a disability, threatened the religious liberty of minority groups in the U.S., and gained wide support among white nationalists for consistently lying about and demeaning blacks, Mexican immigrants, Muslims, and Syrian refugees.

He's mindful of the fact that many people come to his show expecting to see something real — and lately, reality in America requires a very different hand than it did even four years ago.

Most of those that survive will do so by tempering their beliefs with the realities science discovers, and evolving to continue giving their life meaning by adjusting to the facts.

Drawing on the theological work of Henri du Lubac, Hans Boersma, and Rowan Williams, among others, Klassen explains how the fact of this pattern is grounded in the Trinity, in which all material reality participates.

A fact may be defined as something that occurred in reality, but at the solipsist state you can't talk of any reality beyond your own conscience, so the way you made yourself ready to dismiss solipsism as a philosophical idea, not a fact, simply doesn't make any sense.

The recognition that the abstract / concrete distinction is formal suggests that the problem of the necessity of the divine reality does not lie in the fact that it implies that «an abstract part of the antecedent divine event» must necessitate and so be normative over» all subsequent divine events and therefore can not be» «contained» in any concrete divine event» (p. 60).

But before getting to the texts, I think it is appropriate to warn that the original version of Part V as reconstructed below, is quite different from the final version available in Griffin and Sherburne's corrected edition of Process and Reality.7 This can be explained by the fact that Whitehead did continue to revise the original version a number of times and according to the rather unusual procedure I discussed in the introduction, that is, mainly, by adding new materials.

This is a reality of Christian life, and the fact that not everyone receives truth well doesn't instantly mean that we have conveyed it unlovingly.

Insofar as a Christian theology, with its inherent theodicy, can do justice to the more neutral facts in a more coherently adequate way than theologies (including a / theologies) starting from a different vision of reality, the idea of the perfectly good, loving nature of God is warranted.

The notion of different visions of reality does somewhat relativize the notion of «facts of experience,» to be sure, by saying that different visions will lead people to notice different facts consciously and / or to valorize the same facts differently.

The reality of it, the sheer fact of it, does not figure prominently in most people's minds.

To do that we have to establish a way to prove an assumption by: 1) asserting a hypothesis and its components 2) testing the components for substantial supporting evidence, unsupported components go back to be refined 3) either agree after successful testing that in our shared reality the hypothesis is now supported, or that overall unsupported components may mean the hypothesis fails 4) for sake of ease many people call these tested and supported hypotheses «facts», but again that's just so that we can get on with progress.

In fact, you are so immersed in doing so, that you completely ignore the realities of the statements that you are responding to.

Nevertheless, the fact that the call to obedience rests upon faith alone, does not take away from the Christian the sense of reality he has found in the life of daily obedience.

If the atheist statement «there is no god» is re-phrased as «materialistic forces only are responsible for creation and the subsequent fuctioning of reality / the universe» then you in fact * do * have a lot of explaining to do.

The fact that it provides a better way of understanding reality does not count in its favor so far as physics is concerned.

Christianity, and in fact any religion that believes in a personal god / creator, has two fundamental flaws that have absolutely nothing to do with science and everything to do with logic, which incidentally forms the foundation for the only universal / objective truths of reality (putting aside the Cartesian dualism problem).

Thus the bodies are perceived as with qualities which in reality do not belong to them, qualities which in fact are purely the offspring of the mind.

So who cares about religious people, you can't convince someone of reality when they fabricate their own, they fabricate their proof, their facts, best thing is just do your thing and stay way from them as much possible, most of the times they turn more people into atheists than atheists themselves by the things they say and do anyway, lol so no need for us to do it.

The meaning of this passage has been a matter of dispute among New Testament experts, although it is quite obvious that if it does nothing more it asserts that the Apostle believed that there was some connection between the fact of death and the reality of human sin.

In fact, it is the consideration of evil which constrains us to make this new move; now, with the consideration of evil, it is the very question, of freedom, of the real freedom evoked by the postulates of the Critique of Practical Reason, which returns; the problematic of evil requires us to tie, more directly than we have so far been able to do, the actual reality of freedom to the regeneration which is the very content of hope.

For of course there could not simply be two perfections of two heterogeneous realities merely in fact juxtaposed, otherwise it would be impossible to see how and why the perfection of the material world should depend essentially as it does in Christian philosophy on the history of spirit and its freedom.

But if this is asserted and if we do not wish to think of the orientation of the development by God as a series of arbitrary measures taken by him and as giving impetus to the development from outside (a way of representing the matter which is absurd in fact and method, for all kinds of reasons), then this orientation can only be conceived as happening precisely through, and out of, 11 the of course ultimately divinely - created reality of what Is itself developing in that way.

@ Isaac, the bible is full of it and the fact that you can't deal with reality so much that you almost killed yourself and have to delude yourself to keep going doesn't make it true.

For, if what is essential to a person is not the facts of when and where or the facts of what was said and done, but rather the meaning of those facts for those whose experience and memory of the person was also part of their historical reality, then there is no place else for us to look.»

To be sure, God is for Jesus almighty, but prayer of petition involves the insight that the concept of omnipotence by no means lies at man's disposal as a way of viewing reality, that man does not in actual fact possess the knowledge of God as the Almighty.

Scientific facts about day of resurrection In this research we are going to make a scientific analysis for many events in day of resurrection to prove that the Qur «an doesn't contradict with science and the scientific realities... http://www.kaheel7.com/eng/index.php/unseen-miracles/405-scientific-facts-about-day-of-resurrection

In the present case, it is important that we do not lose sight of the fact that, in reality, there is no such thing as an electrical field that is separable from current sources, a medium, chemical gradients, heat, gravity, and so on ad infinitum.

But there are some Christians who live (especially on reality TV) exactly like the rest of the world and you wouldn't even know that they were a «Christian» except for the fact that they go to church... which technically still doesn't make them a Christian

Well pedro, why didn't you just cut to the chase and say outright that no amount of evidence or facts will persuade you to believe reality?

Perhaps sufficient will have been said if I point out that process thought is based upon wide generalizations made from those experiences of fact, and those facts of experience, which demonstrate to us the dynamic, active, on - going «creative advance» of the world; and which, in recognizing and accepting the patent reality of such a world, sees man as part of it sharing in that movement, and a principle of ordering and direction, which may properly be called God, explaining why and how the advance goes on as it does.

For Piaget, the ontological egocentricity of the child was due primarily to the fact that the child does not yet differentiate its selfhood from the Being of the universe (RME 110, 241); therefore, the child is not yet conscious of itself as being other over against the world and, therefore, interprets the whole reality according to its own experience.

The sense and degree to which psychologists are behaviorists gets its significance from the fact that, in studying animals, that is, the sort of thing that we ourselves are, we have a dual access to reality, which we do not have in studying inanimate nature.

Gil you have asked some very good questions why does bad things happen in the world i personally do nt know God did nt explain to Job either why he had to suffer.What i do know is that God desires that none of us should perish but that all would have eternal life in him through Jesus Christ.This world will one day pass away and the real world will be reborn so our focus as christians is on whats to come and being a witness in the here and now.Both good and bad happens to either the righteous or the sinner so what are we to make of that.What we do know is that God will set all things right at the appointed time the wicked will be judged and the righteous will be rewarded for there faith isnt that enough reason for us to believe.Free will is only a reality if we can choose between good and bad but our hearts are deceitfully wicked we naturally are inclined toward sin that is another reason whyt we need to be saved from ourselves so what are we to do.For me Christ died and rose again that is a fact witnessed by over 500 people that were alive at the time and was recorded by historians how many other religious leaders do you know that did that or did the miracles that Jesus did.As far as the bible is concerned much of the archelogical evidence has proven to be correct and many of prophetic words spoken many hundreds of years ago have come to pass including both the birth and the death of Jesus.Interested in what philosophy you are believing in if other than a faith in Jesus Christ so how does that philosophy give you the assurance that you are saved.Its really simple with christianity we just have to believe in Jesus Christ.brentnz

In respect to human experience, Berkeley challenges us to explain «the complete concreteness of our intuitive experience,» a phrase that is consonant with his insistence that concrete reality consists in just those ideas we do in fact have.

Ford's genetic approach, it seems, has the potential to do more, and in fact already does more than simply tracing the successive shapes taken by Whitehead's metaphysical system during the composition of Process and Reality.

Even if true, this theological reality does not change the demographic fact that millions upon millions of Americans are Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Muslims and non-believers.

This assumption glosses over the fact that in the reality of unequal societies this freedom does not exist for everyone.

The fact is that our experience gives us all this together, as being profoundly one in impact upon us; we can not cut up the world of experience, after the fashion of an earlier philosophy, and speak as if that which in its aesthetic quality has subjective appeal must lack any genuine reality in the world itself, simply because it does not lend itself to a particular kind of analysis by measurement or testing.

That bumper sticker dictum did, however, contain the hint of a more authentic reality: our major social ills do, in fact, have profound links to the sexual dualisms that split spirit from body and establish patriarchy.

While he does maintain that both science and philosophy bear upon absolute reality, Bergson would be the first to uphold the fact that they are radically different ways of knowing radically different aspects of reality.