Sentences with phrase «facts of scientific studies»

The author is not trying to scare anyone - just stating the facts of scientific studies.

Not exact matches

But to every rule there is an exception, and glad I was to be called out (and called up) by the founder and CEO of one mobile - health company whose entire premise is based on scientific research with repeatable results — the exact study, in fact, I had used as my example of what works better than a health app.

A growing stack of scientific studies attests to the fact that even just a glimpse of nature reduces stress and increases happiness and creativity.

«Although jade eggs are slightly different than traditional kegels, goop is up front about the fact that there are no scientific studies proving or disproving the effectiveness of a jade egg,» a rep said in a statement.

However, Spicer then signaled that the White House sees recreational pot very differently, with the press secretary even attempting to link recreational use of the drug to the abuse of opioid drugs across the U.S. (In fact, there has been little scientific evidence linking marijuana legalization to opioid use, with some studies actually showing a decrease in opioid overdoses in states where legal marijuana is available.)

For example, books reviewed in the first months of 1910 included Herbert Croly's The Promise of American Life; Education in the Far East, by Charles F. Thwing; a philosophical study titled Religion and the Modern Mind, by Frank Carleton Doan; Jane Addams's The Spirit of Youth and the City Streets; The Immigrant Tide, by Edward Steiner; Medical Inspectors of Schools (a Russel Sage Foundation study); A. Modern City (a scientific study of that phenomenon), by William Kirk; The Leading Facts of American History, by D. H. Montgomery; and Jack London's collection of short stories, Lost Face.

To suppose that the scientific study of nature is a natural by - product of a certain stage of cultural development simply does not fit the facts of world history.

The scientific evidence of the innateness of homosexuality, bisexuality, and transgenderism is overwhelming, and more peer - reviewed studies which bolster this fact are being added all the time.

Are we still at this point in history where people are being ridiculously unaccepting of scientific fact to the point where they are even referencing studies that they can not come up with a source for simply because they do not exist?

This exposition is intended to show that we still stand merely at a beginning, even apart from the fact that palaeontology and other branches of the scientific study of man are far from having reached the end of their inquiries in their own domain.

But for the sake both of truth and continued human progress, the integrity and independence of science ought to be preserved against those who would compel it to state, as scientific fact, that something exists outside of its sole field of study, which is nature.

And if you don't know Dave, believe me: He's not just telling you want you want to hear to sell books: In fact, he cites 229 scientific studies in the book (on top of his own 15 years and $ 300,000 worth of personal research).

Despite criticism, her steadfast belief that corporal punishment was detrimental to children's mental and emotional health and development has since been supported by a number of scientific studies and is widely accepted as fact by nearly all infant and baby care experts today.

Paradoxically, what appears to be the most damning fact is not that homebirth has been shown, in every scientific study and existing state and national statistics, to triple the rate of neonatal death, but that MANA refuses to release their own statistics on the neonatal death rate of homebirth midwives.

All of the benefits mentioned below are based on scientific fact after years spent studying the progress of babies weaned at different ages.

Our moms may not have had the advantage of numerous scientific sleep studies to rely on, but they weren't just making up facts out of thin air when they insisted that kids need their sleep.

«A person who studies scientific books with a view of knowing the real facts ought to turn himself into an opponent of everything that he studies; he should thoroughly assess its main as well as its margin parts, and oppose it from every point of view and in all its aspects.

The fact that he had no access to the fancy tools of bacteriologists, the scientific rock stars of their time, turned him toward the study of animal tissues and cells.

Alternative facts are not facts at all, but socially sanctioned beliefs, said Bayer, who has studied the scientific literature of persuasion enough to call himself a «persuasion nerd.»

So, when Thomas Gieryn suggests that «science studies has now convinced everybody that scientific facts are only contingently credible», it is clear that «everybody» refers to the members of a distinct community.

Last year, Brandon McFadden, an assistant professor of food and resource economics at the UF Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, published a study that showed scientific facts scarcely change consumers» impressions of genetically modified food and other organisms.

«Despite the limitations of a single arm, non-randomized study, we infer from these data that Interferon ß - 1a treatment is worth further consideration for the treatment of Ebola virus disease,» said Dr. Fish, who is also a Professor in the Department of Immunology at the University of Toronto, noting that the decision to undertake the clinical trial was based on previous preliminary scientific data, and on the fact that no currently approved antivirals exist to treat Ebola.

It is a powerful life - changing discussion of scientific proof, and facts, along with world - wide studies, leading to the cure of T2D.

In fact, if you go to the omega - 3 fat page on GreenMedInfo.com, you will see a list of scientific studies supporting the benefits of omega - 3s for 254 different diseases, which is powerful proof of their broad - reaching scope.

In fact, a 2012 study in the British Journal of Sports Medicine noted that there's no scientific evidence that ice helps with muscle recovery.

Setting the fact that the bias from big pharma (which we know include / control / owns dairy industry etc.) is real and even documented and not just potential, how can you compare the «potential» bias of somebody who has very high economic interest in having a specific result coming out of the study with that of somebody who is simply following a related social, scientific, religious, pratical etc. pattern?

Sometimes, a blood or saliva test may be offered, but tests for adrenal fatigue are not based on scientific facts or supported by good scientific studies, so the results and analysis of these tests may not be correct.

With thousands of case studies utilizing fact - based scientific theory, they explain why iodine deficiency continues to be a problem in the US, even after the addition of iodine to table salt, and that it is one of the critical deficiencies responsible for goiter and nodular formation.

As a matter of fact, results of a comprehensive double - blind scientific study with The Original Himalayan Crystal Salt conducted at the Inter-University of Graz, Austria, demonstrated that the patients in the study who used Original Himalayan Crystal Salt «saw significant positive changes in respiratory, circulatory, organ, connective tissue and nervous system functions.»

In fact, scientific studies suggest that most of us decide within 4 minutes.

Yatvin argues that this study is often interpreted as illustrating «the fact that human subjects who know they are part of a scientific experiment may sabotage the study in their eagerness to make it succeed.»

Diane Ravitch's claim that school voucher programs have failed is based on ignoring much of the scientific evidence of their success, misreporting the facts regarding the studies that she does discuss, and the 1 percent difference between 95 % confidence and 94 % confidence.

In fact, there are only a couple of objective scientific studies even done on this test.

Being a theoretical explanation of the fact of researching this very topic, your introduction should also contain the information, which answers whether this very topic is widely researched in scientific literature or there exist some definite gaps, which should be filled in with the help of this very study you make in your dissertation.

In fact, even though scientific studies have shown that only around 2 % of healthy cats are infected with FeLV or FIV, 2 many animal re-homing organizations require such testing prior to adoption or transfer.

In fact, both scientific studies and experience show that training the dog with the use of negative reinforcement methods is likely to backfire and to cause the dog to show behavioral problems.

Finding that hard scientific proof is the goal of a new study by the American Humane Association that aims to provide empirically proven facts of what many anecdotally know to be true — puppy love can make you feel better... read more

In fact one of the first scientific studies highlighting the importance of reinforcement in animal behavior was done with cats.

[M] ore important than any single study or report, the members of this institution embody what is so necessary for us to continue our scientific advance and to maintain our cutting - edge, and that's restless curiosity and boundless hope, but also a fidelity to facts and truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leads....

And more important than any single study or report, the members of this institution embody what is so necessary for us to continue our scientific advance and to maintain our cutting - edge, and that's restless curiosity and boundless hope, but also a fidelity to facts and truth, and a willingness to follow where the evidence leads.

Even if one takes the Cook study at face value, then how does a scientific consensus of 97.1 % about a fact make policy - making any easier?

Of course, this is ALL hypothetical, since we do not have any robust attribution studies based on empirical scientific data to confirm the anthropogenic portion of the changes measured by Leviticus et al., assuming that these are correct, despite the stated fact that (bold type by meOf course, this is ALL hypothetical, since we do not have any robust attribution studies based on empirical scientific data to confirm the anthropogenic portion of the changes measured by Leviticus et al., assuming that these are correct, despite the stated fact that (bold type by meof the changes measured by Leviticus et al., assuming that these are correct, despite the stated fact that (bold type by me):

BBD - With all due respect, the study does nothing to explain how the scientific community has failed to come to grips with the fact that there is now pretty good evidence that we do not understand how the climate system works well enough to accurately determine the impact of additional atmospheric CO2.

ABC, CBS and NBC's lengthy omission of scientists critical of global warming alarmism propped up the myth of a scientific consensus, despite the fact the many scientists and thousands of peer - reviewed studies that disagree.

While following climate change news for the past year, I have marveled at the lack of attention given scientific specialties outside of «climate science», despite the fact the foci of those studies could significantly impact global weather patterns.

And in fact when you look at the scientific literature, it's an interesting disconnect because the modelers who study emissions and how to control those emissions are generally much more comfortable setting goals in terms of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas concentrations because that comes more or less directly out of their models and is much more proximate or more closely connected to what humans actually do to screw up the climate in the first place, which is emit these greenhouse gases.

For a discussion of the scientific consensus on global climate change, which is to say, the facts and theories reputable climate scientists agree on as a result of repeated experiment and study, see realclimate.org.

Part of the power of these studies was the fact that no complex modeling was required to reach their conclusions and thus could be easily replicated by lay analysts without need for publication in peer - reviewed scientific journals.

On the other side of the coin, forcing all new facts, all findings of research, to align with existing accepted facts or to the overriding current theories of a field of study retards or even prevents scientific progress.

DAVID KAROLY: He does say that and his comments are difficult to assess at present, mainly because the details of his study are in fact under peer review for a scientific journal.