Sentences with phrase «facts of that case do»

He reiterated that the facts of the case did not warrant charges pressed against the former secretary of state.

But the facts of the case do not support the narrative they are pushing at all.

The particular facts of that case don't matter for our purpose here.

Still, the facts of this case do matter: first off, quite obviously this photo should have never been censored, even if the initial flagging was understandable.

Hampton Realty v. Conklin (220 A.D. 2d 385)- issues of justifiable reliance and reasonable inquiry; motion for a leave to appeal denied (87 N.Y. 2d 805); non-jury trial judgment in favor of broker for commission reversed; broker not the procuring cause where purchaser and seller discussed availability of property prior to listing and where broker did nothing of any significance to assist in the negotiations between buyer and seller aside from a single visit to the property; facts of the case do not support oral promise to «protect» the broker's commission; reasonable duration for term of brokerage agreement implied where agreement contained no term as to its duration and, under the circumstances of the case, it would not be reasonable to extend the duration of the agreement for a term of more than one year.

Not exact matches

In case you needed a refresher on the world of witchcraft and wizardry, the little prince does, in fact, share a name with three members of the prominent family.

Even if the investigator doesn't know a person directly, if that person's reputation precedes them, it might be hard for the investigator to stick to the facts of the case.

In fact, while the billionaire doesn't mention it in his op - ed piece, he has also reportedly been involved in financing several other lawsuits against Gawker that haven't gone to trial, some of which have even less legal merit than the Gawker case.

If you can not do this, prepare to argue for a special exception to his standard based on the special facts of your case.»

To wit: an empty slot in a drink case; two halves of a Pepsi logo that didn't align perfectly; stickers on a cooler door that impede the view of a logo inside; the fact that two brands of pretzels, Stacy's and Rold Gold, are placed next to each other despite being marketed to very different customers.

Now, the woman — named as Jane Doe in the case — is suing Uber, Kalanick, Michael, and Alexander for defamation, intrusion into private affairs, and public disclosure of private facts, according to the New York Times on Thursday.

Fun Fact: Says Niño: «While we don't wear white hats, the collective fixer team have lent a helping hand in everything from national elections, Fortune 50 mergers and acquisitions to global humanitarian crises, Oscar - award winning films and even a couple of U.S. Supreme Court cases.

It doesn't help that Canadians often get lulled into a sense of complacency, unwisely believing that we live in a country that protects investors through laws and regulations, when in fact the opposite is the case.

«We are doing what journalists throughout said mainstream media are supposed to do: challenge the conventional wisdom, hold politicians» feet to the fire, ask tough questions, report facts that are in many cases inconvenient truths for career politicians, and give a voice to the millions of people worldwide who have had theirs taken away from them by world elites who consider the ordinary person beneath them,» Boyle said, pointing to Breitbart's record July traffic as evidence Americans «hunger for something different.»

The facts are not right here, energy is cheap that means the cost of manufacturing and transporting of goods is low, food and consumers staples already more affordable, so what if a few American oil companies going out of business.the cost of producing oil in middle east is less than $ 10 / bl and we were paying more than $ 140 / bl for it, with that huge profit margin the big oil companies and oil producing nations became richer and the rest of us left behind, with the oil price this low the oil giants don't want to reduce the price at pump even a penny, because they are so greedy.worst case scenario is some CEOs bonuses might drop from $ 20 million to $ 15 millions I am sure they will survive.in terms of the stock market it always bounces back, after all it's just a casino like game.

If we include the fact that the perpetrator's two manifestos clearly state a strong personal dislike of the VP of Information Technology (whom the perpetrator referenced as having made specific comments in the past) and the CEO, and specifically names employees that are liked and are doing a good job, then it seems, without a shadow of doubt, to be an open and shut case.

But other legal experts said that the mere fact of Mr. Thiel's involvement did not change the case.

The facts: When you turn age 70 1/2, the IRS will require you to begin taking withdrawals from certain types of retirement accounts (in most cases, it doesn't matter when you actually retire).

I do not see a case for a further rate increase on current facts and remain very concerned that macroeconomic policy has inadequately internalized all the aspects of large declines in the neutral real rate and secular stagnation risks.

That's all to the good; I don't think it's an accident that the first wide - open Best Picture race in decades coincides with the fact that a quarter of voting members have joined since 2014, and that a far lower percentage of them are straight, white male American elders than is the case with the other 75 percent of voters.

The district court in First Solar ultimately applied the standard from the Daou line of cases and held that plaintiffs did not need to show that the market reacted to the fact that First Solar had committed fraud in order to satisfy the loss causation requirement.

While the Court did not expressly overrule the Metzler line of cases, it limited those cases to their facts.

But in our haste to use links as a means to an end, we can lose sight of the fact that the act of building links in many cases can carry benefits that have absolutely nothing to do with the Google - naut or any other search monster.

«As CEO, you didn't know some key facts,» said Debbie Dingell, a Michigan Democrat, ticking off a list of questions Zuckerberg said he'd get back to members on, from «major court cases regarding your privacy policy» to «all the kinds of information Facebook is collecting from its own users.»

«The other thing that's kind of worked for them so far has been the fact that they have a mix of agility and skill in the sense that individual countries at five or 10 million are agile enough to do a lot of these things, create a case, data, case study and then present it at the EU level.

Except if you are worshipping at the Church of Byron Sharp, in which case there has to be a specific and extremely complicated reason why either the Brexit campaigners were in actual fact targeting everyone or this campaign clearly did not work, despite what everyone is starting to suggest.

Here's a study done, scientifically to show there is no «power of prayer» and it in fact can cause harm in some cases: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/31/health/31pray.html?pagewanted=all

As our knowledge of what is «real» changes, so does our science... our understanding of science is reactionary, so in many cases «FACT» should really be interpreted as «factual until proven otherwise.»

Unfortunately in my case, I've probably gone to excess the other way... after 43 years of being (in my view) threatened with hellfire for every cotton - picking thing (including the «sinfulness» of being born in the first place because it's a well - known scriptural fact that every human is born sinful and separated from G - d, with a heart that does nothing but desire evil and no way to please G - d even when righteous), threatened with being «left behind» in the rapture (should I fail on some doctrinal (belief) point at the crucial moment)... I refuse to consider ANY possibility of hell at all.

Paul is making the case that Jesus did in fact rise therefore our faith is firm and the act of baptism associates you with the death, burial and resurrection and shows others (those living) your choice and association with Christ.

If you don't understand that the total angular momentum of a gas cloud is an aggregate quantity, but in fact there are local variations which can give rise to counter-spinning moons, and that in any case gravitational interactions between objects can produce retro - grade orbits then how in heavens name can you pretend to understand something as complex as evolution.

yo the thing is not about believing or not, is the fact that if we don't believe then we are worthless living garbage who occupy a space in the universe only to create crap and pollution, in that kind of case we would better be recycled into some industrial material for a better use than eating and living like cattle, but if there is a god we acquire a divine status and a purpose to continue to exist beyond afterlife or at least the idea of it, which would give life a sense right?

It's the 0.001 % of them who hold rallies, blow themselves up, and go on television / radio (in the case of Fox News, start their own network) who HATE the fact that there are those of us out there who do not accept the idea of God or Jesus or Allah and think it is unacceptable.

----------------- Your opinions on the Bible are of no consequence in this case, since the manuscript evidence proves the point that Constantine in fact did not invent the divinity of Jesus.

Philip Larkin's «Church Going» comes to mind: Yet stop I did: in fact I often do, And always end much at a loss like this, Wondering what to look for; wondering, too, When churches fall completely out of use What we shall turn them into, if we shall keep A few cathedrals chronically on show, Their parchment, plate, and pyx in locked cases, And let the rest rent - free to rain and sheep.

Does he tell you facts that you couldn't possibly know otherwise, such as your complete genome pattern, or who are the «real killers» in the OJ case, or what's inside of Arcturus?

Lively, with representation by Liberty Counsel (an evangelical legal organization), responded that in both the U.S. and Uganda he exercised constitutionally protected speech rights; that he opposes violence and neither committed nor plotted any; that Uganda did not in fact pass a proposed draconian anti-gay law, and that in any case Uganda's political institutions, instead of himself, are responsible for its political decisions; and that the court lacks jurisdiction and the plaintiffs lack standing.

The pamphlet «What makes Man Unique» comments that nature, from its own internal laws, should not produce an animal which is beyond environmental control, as it in fact does in the case of man.

How is he going to claim he was defamed if he does not point to specific comments, which the facts of the case undermine?

Do not make hasty generalizations and insult people claiming they don't know what they are talking about when in fact the statement they have made is applicable to the vast majority of the cases which they are discussinDo not make hasty generalizations and insult people claiming they don't know what they are talking about when in fact the statement they have made is applicable to the vast majority of the cases which they are discussing.

Why don't we all admit that none of us know the detailed facts of the case, and therefore should maybe just stay out of it.

I will agree that an argument from majority is not always valid, but in this case I think it would be analogous to the fact that there is a small percentage of individuals who don't believe we went to the moon.

If one considers the statistically significant size of the historical atheist set and contrasts it with the fact that not one in a thousand religious leaders have committed similarly large - scale atrocities, it is impossible to conclude otherwise, even if we do not yet understand exactly why this should be the case.

In case you missed the real facts... Obama is a christian but it doesn't fmatter - according to the constitution his religion is not to come in to play... if you base your vote off of his belief, you might as well stay home in your sand box and let the real adults do the thinking for you.

More concretely, the glorification of dialectical tension in Soloveitchik's case can obscure the extent to which his thinking, with all its nuance and complexity, does in fact exhibit exceptional coherence, harmony, and integration.

Everything points to the fact that Isaac — like so many of us sons — neither understood nor approved of what his father did or stood for; and, you might wish to add, in Isaac's case for good reason.

But the saying does not, in fact, relegate the Baptist to a bygone age; rather, the opposite is the case in that «From (apo) the days of John the Baptist...» must be understood as including the Baptist in the present age, that of the Kingdom (E. Percy, Die Botschaft Jesu [Lunds Universitets Arsskrift, N.F. Adv. I Bd.

«There could be single cases that can be justified, for instance when a prostitute uses a condom, and this can be a first step towards a moralization, a first assumption of responsibility, to develop again the awareness of the fact that not all is allowed and that one can not do everything one wants,» Benedict says in the book, «Light of the World: The Pope, the Church, and the Signs of the Times.»

Language does not «point out» objects in the world, but tries to paint a complete «picture» of the «facts» — of what is the case and not the case in the world, which is the totality of all such facts.

In any case it was probably inevitable that Bultmann's pupils (such as Günther Bornkamm)-- while accepting his negative verdicts that Jesus did not think of himself as Messiah, Son of God, or Son of Man — should refuse to accept the dispiriting embargo on all discussion about how Jesus did regard himself, and refuse as well to accept the excessively rigorous skepticism about the facts behind the Gospels» literary forms.