Sentences with phrase «facts proving the theory»

Not exact matches

I was SHOCKED when I heard you espousing the UN IPCC theory as a proven fact.

That big bang stuff is a THEORY not a FACT so you can not prove your big bang either, so isnt that mythology as well?

Many of the theories which were taught as scientific fact have been proved wrong.

, you have no right what - so - ever to force your non-belief upon me and try to tell me I can't say «merry xmas», celebrate the birth and resurection and ensure that my child knows that evolution is NOT a fact but a theory yet to be proven, yet you and your liberal morons try to every day.

Theories never get proven or promoted to fact or law.

When scienctific community believes thay have proven it to be fact I am sure they will call a fact not a theory.

The big bang theory, though not proven, DOES have a mountain of scientific FACTS that support it!

Again this does not deny that it is probably correct but to date it is still a theory and still being study to prove fact.

Steve wrote,» That big bang stuff is a THEORY not a FACT so you can not prove your big bang either, so isnt that mythology as well?

It is in fact, still a «theory», and thus, has not been proven.

A theory undergoes constant review until it is proven fact.

I like to think stuff through and not follow every new idea and theory, which should be distinguished from facts proven scientifically.

Not to be editing, but scientifically speaking anything that is a theory is not fact because a theory can only be disproved, not proven.

If that was true there would be no progress, the fact we continue to progress proves your theory WRONG.

How could the theory of evolution even conceivably be «proved» to the same degree as «the fact that the earth goes around the sun»?

It is true that many scientific theories have proven to be wrong but many have also been proven to be fact including many that religion had deemed as blasphemy such as the world is round and the sun is the center of our solar system.

Peace prizes have gone to people associated with horrible acts, economics is all theory and is proven accurate one year and inaccurate the next, and literature is of dubious contribution to advancement — ignoring of course the fact that what some consider to be great literature, others feel is dull and uninsightful.

i am not sure how admitting evolution is a theory, and not a proven fact equates to someone not getting a job in future.

Maybe we did but it sure is hard to believe and certainly not something that can be proven beyond a doubt or it wouldn't be a theory anymore... it would be a fact.

The very premise of something being a theory is that it should be questioned until proven to be fact.

Come on... I do see scientific theories as interesting — However, I am open to the idea that it is all wrong, even the theories that were «proven» and became «fact» — Why?

that's why it's called a «theory» of evolution (with a lot of holes), It's not proven fact.

Science is based on finding the facts, but many times throughout history different scientific theories (once beleived as fact) have been proven incorrect - thus creating a new theory based off the original but inclusive to the new facts that have arisen.

And the fact of the matter is the theory has not been proven.

The difference being that even after something has been proven, or at least widely accepted as fact, can still be called a theory.

Evolution is a theory NOT fact, and can NOT prove / explain how plants and animals came into existence.

The Big Bang is no longer a theory for example, it has been proven as fact.

but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.

There is no way to prove or disprove a higher being, and there is no way to prove or disprove the big bang theory (contrasting beliefs in most people's opinions), but what we do know is the Earth is way older than 6,000 - 10,000 years old, and that is FACT.

That is a very dry world to live in... as far as theory is concerned it is as enigmatic as religous beliefs... Example 2 hydrogen and on oxygen make water... it is proven fact.

i see no proof of your statements, at least science has the integrity to admitt to whatever being only a theory and not fact — your BELIEF is nothing but a thought you hold on to like a baby and there special blanky... sceince attempts to prove or even to disprove itself, you just go on believing what some silk covered so called humble man with gold in his pockets tells you.

Since when is the big bang THEORY a proven fact?

Evolution (that is a proved fact) and his theory are not the same thing.

there isn't any «faith» in science, it's based on facts which science calls «theories» meaning they have already been proven to be true.

It is based on what man knows to be at the time, but as I said, even theories based on «facts» has been proven to change.

Scientists gather information, prove facts, and then extrapolate a theory based on the facts that exist.

I'm not talking about «neo-darwinism;» I'm talking about the evolutionary theory that the entire scientific community accepts as proven fact because it is proven fact, and because science reaffirms its factual status a couple of thousand times a day.

Take the money away from the public schools where children will be taught real science and that a «theory» is very close to a proven fact because it is supported by the preponderance of the evidence.

I have provided you with a proven human accomplishment that is fact and science has provided a model / theory of evolution that excludes this as being a possibility (an intelligence that purposely creates).

However under the current evolution theory you would not be able to prove (or even consider) this goat was in fact engineered by an intelligence (humans).

Compare to the big bang theory that scientists are quickly proving as fact.

Theories exist but no facts to prove where all this stuff came into being.

Same for evolution, evolutionary theory is not fully proven (although there is NO evidence found that goes against it which makes it very very likely to be correct), but its a FACT that we evolved along with all other life on earth.

When a theory is proven to be true it is then no longer a theory, but a fact.

Germ theory of disease is also not fully proven, but its a FACT that we get diseases due to microorganisms.

Anyone who believes that evolutionary theory isn't sufficiently proven doesn't understand the facts.

So saying that a theory is unproven doesn't really mean anything when the facts will always stay forever whether the theory is fully proven or not.

Evolution isn't a scientifically established fact, and however sensible it might appear as a biological theory, it hasn't been, and will never be proved; it is unprovable in principle.

«What makes science science — publicly presenting facts and reasoning, subjecting ideas to rigorous criticism and many rounds of testing to confirm or overturn theories — is premised upon a willingness to be proved wrong,» Holt wrote.

The team printed t - shirts with that motto, written in Greek, acknowledging the fact that many of the theories they tested were eventually proved wrong.