Sentences with phrase «facts wrong here»

Not exact matches

Here's another fun fact: according to Wikipedia (who's never wrong), the average human digestive system produces approximately 3 grams of ethanol per day (a little less than a third of a beer)... completely irrelevant to an article on intermittent fasting and alcohol, but interesting nonetheless.

The outstanding example, of course, is the Chinese government's long - running «one - child policy,» replete with forced abortions, public trackings of menstrual cycles, family flight, increased female infanticide, sterilization, and other assaults too numerous even to begin cataloguing here — in fact, so numerous that they are now widely, if often grudgingly, acknowledged as wrongs even by international human - rights bureaucracies.

Besides the fact that chronologically religion has man's existence here on earth ALL wrong, there can be no doubt we have experienced evolutionary change in the very short time that religion has been in existence.

Here's a fact for you — 1/2 the time you sign on, you spell science wrong.

This lecture is the sort of thing that tempts some folks to say that bishops should stick to theology and avoid politics, but, in fact, what's wrong here is both political and theological.

In fact, here is a suggestion: Do not waste time telling me I am wrong.

Of course, losing wingers Robben and Ribery will have forced his hand slightly here, but it still shows a lack of a Plan B that Pep couldn't bring out a similar threat from other players like Gotze and Muller, who can both play wide, or indeed use Lahm in his preferred position of right - back and utilise his quality from there — in fact, the former Germany captain's use as a midfielder since this manager's arrival is one of many examples of his attempts at tactical innovation going wrong.

In fact, Budd sees nothing wrong in whatever Arsene does and he gives no f *** k what anyone here thinks.

PS: Don't get me wrong, I respect the fact that you post your optimistic yet contrarian views on here despite all the evidence that keep stacking up as an argument against optimism.

You saying it's fans like me who are settlers is totally pointless.In my comments I never said I was settling no didn't want change.The way you said «stupid team» and «coach out of his depths» is what I was referring to.In fact I want a change today and I'm tired of seeing thing go on like this so don't come here and pretend like you are the only one who wants a change and think I'm part of those who settle for this.When I also see people predicting Arsenal's positions and they are so certain about it it makes me laugh and think of them as naive.Trust me there's no wrong for a person to predict a team's position but it's naive for a person to be certain about it and people come and quote sayings like «no one knows tomorrow».

i really hate this here that there is no room for open and objective discussions but only namecalling and bashings and the worst of them are, and that my friends is a fact, the extreme haters of wenger, with them you cant talk, anything and everything wenger does is senile and wrong..

Andres S I can't fault a word you have said.He made that change at half time that changed the shape just enough to get the job done and you have to acknowledge the team responding.This now leads us to the fact we have ANOTHER Wembley date that 90 other teams wish they had despite it being labelled a Mickey Mouse tournament.Win it and we have Europa Cup minimum next season (correct me if I'm wrong here) and that will keep him in the job next season no matter how much we recognise and want change.I suppose all the AKB's will be swinging from the chandeliers (note - that was for you JW) at what we still feel will be an under achievement but they would rejoice at us winning the Emirates Cup they are so blinkered.Yes he got the job done last night but let's not be fooled he is the manager that can take us forward.In spite of that we will all ba at Wembley and as we all know we NEVER LOSE there.

I've been a AFC supporter for 36 years mate but my loyalty does not blind me to the fact that things are wrong here..

Yet another thing Wenger gets stick for is his dealings in the transfer market, but here we have proof, that despite not being perfect, and the occasional mistake, Wenger gets it right far more than he gets it wrong, and is in fact a genius in the transfer market.

But they haven't proven it, and given all the caveats here (the fact the study in general has been wrong so many times before; the fact that women who choose to breastfeed for 2 years are quite different in many ways, not just breastfeeding) give us good reason to take the findings with a grain of salt.

But here is my opinion, and it's actually pretty short and sweet... it is a FACT that anything can go wrong in cildbirth, and it can happen with no warning.

Since there are two facts here that people are getting wrong, let me help you...

See, the problem here is not that the author's concerns are invalid, or that her facts are wrong.

... And when people look at the facts here, when it comes to funding for homeland security, they'll recognize that he's wrong this time, too.»

«And when people look at the facts here when it comes to funding for homeland security, they'll recognize that he's wrong this time, too,» he concluded, to audible astonishment from reporters.

Here's another fun fact: according to Wikipedia (who's never wrong), the average human digestive system produces approximately 3 grams of ethanol per day (a little less than a third of a beer)... completely irrelevant to an article on intermittent fasting and alcohol, but interesting nonetheless.

Which is to say that the film's interpretation of apartheid may reflect most poorly on the film not because it's wrong but because it's intellectually lazy and, here's the real kicker, LESS INTERESTING than it would have been to show the aliens as not yet another oppressed minority (which has been done to death) but a mass suppressed by an elite group, made to feel like an «other» when, in fact, it's imprisoned in its own homeland.

And here we are, eight years later and more than two years into Governor Malloy's tenure as Connecticut's Chief Elected Official and not only has Malloy failed to lead the way on this crucial issue, but he is, in fact, leading the charge in exactly the wrong direction.

Following your «reasoning», even though we have «grown negative» towards something that we think is fundamental wrong, we should just throw our hands up and accept the fact that they / it is «here», and whatever «experimentation» they can muster out of the fact of their presence, we should be glad about?

Actually, what's wrong here is the fact that I have to go through so many steps to get an ebook sample.

I was wrong here to hold out for my fair value estimate (which proved more theory than fact), wrong to hold out for a takeover offer that never quite materialised, wrong to assume the board & major shareholders could still reliably line up an exit & extract value before it evaporated.

Your facts are wrong here.

I'm not saying there's anything wrong with pure - bred dogs (in fact, I'm pretty sure my rescued Sam here is a pure chocolate lab).

We can go around in circles till infinity, but here's the real truth here: It's clear you're not likely to change your opinion, but your opinion on this is misguided and basically just plain wrong — and the more objective facts are testament to this (looking at things relative the competition, expectations, previous examples, etc.)-- BUT, you are still entitled to that misguided and wrong opinion.

it's ok if Sonic hasn't his classical design, I liked the new design since Sonic adventure for dreamcast (even though I was excited to see again classic Sonic, and I was expecting him to be here in this project, but it's still ok for me XD) the only thing that I dislike, it's the fact that the first zone has... something wrong.

And needless to say, there's nothing wrong with craft ceramics; in fact, all of the ceramicists discussed here continued to make functional objects their entire careers.

«Fact» may carry the wrong associations here, if it connotes the careful, dry transcription of a place detail by detail, which is obviously far from Dodd's methods.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but it appears you dove in and made your remarks before gathering facts, on offer here aplenty.

I see nothing wrong with linking GB Shaw to Eugenics (although the quote you used has been interpreted as satire), or Eugenics to Nazism, except for the fact that it seems completely beside the point here.

Akasofu's prediction is the least wrong of the contrarian predictions examined here, but with a 0.02 °C per decade cooling prediction between 2000 and 2012, has not matched the 0.06 °C per decade warming trend, despite the fact that according to Foster and Rahmstorf, natural climate influences have had an approximately 0.1 °C cooling effect since 2000.

We see the same thing here, where Lindzen did not seem to understand that the original committee had looked at the emails and found nothing wrong — in fact they found all of the synthesized charges w / o merit.

The explanation here, an excellent summary: http://blog.dilbert.com/post/164297628606/how-to-know-youre-in-a-mass-hysteria-bubble Echoing that, their egos are also unable to handle the fact that they're wrong about climate alarm, hence the need to label real... Continue reading →

When someone makes a denial statement, we must respond, «I am sorry but your facts are wrong and here is why...»

You and the two trolls here who go on and on about WUWT and talk how Anthony is wrong here somehow have not a peep to say about the fact that it was NOAA who compared two absolutes from two different systems and sent out a press release.

Here's Merriam Webster's version: Main Entry: carbon dioxide Function: noun: a heavy colorless gas CO 2 that does not support combustion, dissolves in water to form carbonic acid, is formed especially in animal respiration and in the decay or combustion of animal and vegetable matter, is absorbed from the air by plants in photosynthesis, and is used in the carbonation of beverages I know you'll all correct me if i'm wrong in stating if CO2 has no scientific facts supporting global warming based upon a factor of greenhouse gases (as opposed to solar radiation in another post, which would be defined by variations in earth, space, or similar factors), then where does science determine that CO2 «disolves in water to form carbonic acid» and is «absorbed from the air by plants in photosythesis»?

You make trivial web searches to trawl for anything that seems to support your stance then report your findings here as though they refuted the facts: e.g. in answer to my pointing out that the Russian Academy of Sciences refuses to accept AGW, you wrote to me «Here, you are just flat out wrhere as though they refuted the facts: e.g. in answer to my pointing out that the Russian Academy of Sciences refuses to accept AGW, you wrote to me «Here, you are just flat out wrHere, you are just flat out wrong.

In fact, given uncertainties and error bars on our historical temperature measurements, climate scientists are probably trumpeting a perfect fit here to the wrong data.

«you made the same lying, distortion of scientific facts as you are doing here» «People like you disgust me» «don't you ever get tired of being shown how wrong and stupid you are» «Do your work colleagues realize how poor you are at math and statistics (not to mention reading simple words and numbers)?»

The facts here are complicated and I may have got some wrong.

Here the defendant claims they are in fact the ones that have been wronged seeking damages as a result.

As reported in this post from yesterday, and as explained a bit more via this write - up I provided to the fine folks at SCOTUSblog, the Supreme Court yesterday in Dean v. United States, No. 15 - 9260 (April 3, 2017)(available here) ruled that the Eighth Circuit had been wrong to hold that, «in calculating the sentence for [a] predicate offense, a judge must ignore the fact that the defendant will serve the mandatory minimums imposed under § 924 (c).»

Here are 10 of the most common malware myths, and the facts that prove them wrong.

I've read your post several times and you make a lot of good points about getting paid but if you want to use working under a retainer the same as an attorney, you better get facts straight because you are wrong about us here in BC... Your mandatory BBA does not apply here....

Please keep to the facts as this could happen in any business or life environment so it is not right or wrong if a person wants to take it to a legal court but the question should be kept clear» Was it legally right or wrong for Mr. Johnson to make those comments» as that should be the only question here.