Sentences with phrase «factual errors as»

That's because the ISO's study, which focused on potential fuel security concerns in 2024 and 2025, contained clear factual errors as well other assumptions that are highly unlikely and, in some cases, contrary to state laws that help customers reduce their electricity use and bills through energy efficiency and that require a growing percentage of electricity to come from renewable resources.

Not exact matches

It's as easy as opening up the webpage with"genius.com» in front of the URL, finding a factual error, annotating it, and tweeting it out.

Uber executive William Barnes contested Commissioner Avakian's findings, arguing that it was «on an erroneous and incomplete picture of how drivers use the Uber application in Oregon and as such, is filled with factual errors and assertions that are simply wrong.»]

Information on this blog may contain factual errors, outdated facts, or misrepresentation of information and I am not liable for any losses (financial or otherwise) caused as a result of the actions of my readers.

as Ms. Jeff pointed out: This essay has so many factual errors.

In writing any history of the recent past, factual error is a danger, as is distortion of perspective, oversimplification or faulty inference.

I love the illusion of method here and the effort to cast murky questions as matters of factual error.

As much as the bible has factual errors in it, the moral and ethical flaws are much more plentiful and egregiouAs much as the bible has factual errors in it, the moral and ethical flaws are much more plentiful and egregiouas the bible has factual errors in it, the moral and ethical flaws are much more plentiful and egregious.

Although I think Jeremy Waldron is a bit over the top when he describes my review as «actively misleading» for stating, incorrectly, that there were no interrogations at Abu Ghraib, he is both correct and right to point out that there were such interrogations; insofar as his letter illustrates that factual errors undercut a criticism of someone else's factual errors, I take his point.

The definition of being «wrong» has changed as well: in the old days it probably meant that you were going off message, but now it's more likely to involve actual factual errors (if all you're putting out is a spun message, you're probably not even in the game).

Wilson's book contains numerous factual errors, such as «if Darwin were correct, there would be hundreds, thousands of examples» of transitional fossils.

Factual errors abound, reaching their peak with every reference to the «father» of science fiction, Hugo Gernsback, as Hugo Gernsbeck.

CAMBRIDGE, MA — A new analysis of two recent reports, one by a committee of the National Academy of Science's National Research Council (NRC), the other by Alan Ginsburg, a former director of Policy and Program Studies in the U. S. Department of Education, finds that both reports made factual and analytical errors in their examination of the record of Michelle Rhee as Chancellor of Schools for the District of Columbia from 2007 - 2010.

She looks for factual errors, including geographical goofs or anachronisms, such as a song that didn't come out until a decade after your characters go to the prom.

(1) A credit services organization, its salespersons, agents, and representatives, and independent contractors who sell or attempt to sell the services of a credit services organization may not do any of the following: (a) conduct any business regulated by this chapter without first: (i) securing a certificate of registration from the division; and (ii) unless exempted under Section 13 -21-4, posting a bond, letter of credit, or certificate of deposit with the division in the amount of $ 100,000; (b) make a false statement, or fail to state a material fact, in connection with an application for registration with the division; (c) charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration prior to full and complete performance of the services the credit services organization has agreed to perform for the buyer; (d) dispute or challenge, or assist a person in disputing or challenging an entry in a credit report prepared by a consumer reporting agency without a factual basis for believing and obtaining a written statement for each entry from the person stating that that person believes that the entry contains a material error or omission, outdated information, inaccurate information, or unverifiable information; (e) charge or receive any money or other valuable consideration solely for referral of the buyer to a retail seller who will or may extend credit to the buyer, if the credit that is or will be extended to the buyer is upon substantially the same terms as those available to the general public; (f) make, or counsel or advise any buyer to make, any statement that is untrue or misleading and that is known, or that by the exercise of reasonable care should be known, to be untrue or misleading, to a credit reporting agency or to any person who has extended credit to a buyer or to whom a buyer is applying for an extension of credit, with respect to a buyer's creditworthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity; (g) make or use any untrue or misleading representations in the offer or sale of the services of a credit services organization or engage, directly or indirectly, in any act, practice, or course of business that operates or would operate as fraud or deception upon any person in connection with the offer or sale of the services of a credit services organization; and (h) transact any business as a credit services organization, as defined in Section 13 -21-2, without first having registered with the division by paying an annual fee set pursuant to Section 63J -1-504 and filing proof that it has obtained a bond or letter of credit as required by Subsection (2).

For another, much as I respect the National Academy, and the various members of the panel that did that assessment, it was in the end their informed opinion being expressed, and there are actually quite a few factual errors in that report (indeed, Steve McIntyre and I had a rare moment of agreement on this, regarding what they said about ice core records in Antarctica).

Alexi replied: «It does not look as you have grasped the concept at all, since the above statement contains at least THREE factual errors.

[Disclosure: I received a review unit of the Netatmo weather station for evaluation purposes, but the opinions in this post are mine, as are any factual errors.]

Sometimes we will correct factual errors in comments, sometimes we will simply screen out the comments altogether if the net effect is to disinform our readers, as we don't have the time to correct every fallacy.]

As the neuroscientist Antonio D'Amasio made clear in 1994 in «Descartes Error, Emotion, Reason, and The Human Brain» (review by Daniel Dennett here), the «thinking» cognitive cortex needs input from the limbic «feeling» parts of the brain to make sense of any factual information.

I am writing to you, (in your role as Head of the School of Psychology) to request the raw data for an academic paper undertaken at UWA and to bring to your attention a major factual error in the same paper.

Since I never said you were, as a close read of my speculative comment makes clear, it's hardly a «factual error» on my part.

So I would not characterize your comments as corrections of «factual errors», but they are important clarifications and I thank you for them.

As serious as her factual errors are, Carducci's breach of journalistic ethics was much more seriouAs serious as her factual errors are, Carducci's breach of journalistic ethics was much more seriouas her factual errors are, Carducci's breach of journalistic ethics was much more serious.

[Disclosure: I received a review unit of the Solarade, but all opinions here, as well as any possible factual errors, are mine alone.]

[Disclosure: I was loaned a review model of the UPP device, but all opinions here, as well as any factual errors, are mine alone.]

As Lee points out, Kennedy v. Louisiana represents the first time that a Supreme Court decision has been impacted by a blogger's «micro-discovery» of a factual error that would otherwise have gone unnoticed.

Although Markman assigned claim construction to the trial judge, it did not expressly state whether factual findings subsumed in that issue are subject to de novo review (as normally would be the case for legal rulings) or to review for «clear error» (as normally would apply to judicial fact findings).

If the district court decision relies on factual underpinnings, however, such as evidence concerning the «background science or the meaning of a term in the relevant art during the relevant time period -LSB-,]» it should make specific factual findings and those findings are subject to review for clear error:

The analysis, written by Matthew Barge, identified as a recent college graduate, is riddled with legal and factual errors and in many instances virtually mirrors the White House's talking points.

In it, Nagel addresses what he sees as factual errors in the original report.

But, then, if factual causation in law is all about imposing responsibility, it's not so much conflating — because that implies error the way the term is usually used — as failing to adequately define the various steps involved in the process of imposing liability.

An error is overriding if it is «so serious as to be determinative when assessing the balance of probabilities with respect to that particular factual issue»».

In this instance, the Court found that the motion judge committed an error of principle making it inappropriate for the Court to rely on his factual findings of the Appellants» knowledge of their third party claims as dispositive of the appeal.

In my view, the judiciary should strive to have such a court reporting system implemented in trial courts as such a system would ensure that the trial judge had a command of the evidence during trial and had a text transcript of the evidence when preparing his / her reasons for judgment which would reduce factual errors which lead to expensive appeals and in some cases re-trials.

Thus, the Court used the «reliability» factor which is at the heart of the gatekeeping process, but its decision was based essentially on the lack of reliability of the factual foundation of the testimony, rather than the Daubert factors such as testability, publication, error rate or general acceptance.

As previously discussed, the Town's decision to require the appellant to leave the premises and issuing a prospective trespass notice, were premised on factual errors.