This NOAA
factual evidence for the continental U.S. confirms what has previously reported for maximum temperatures across the globe.
No factual evidence for such speculation exists, of course, and thereby it all remains bog - standard case of speculative delusion.
Hence, the reviews will produce the most realistic and
factual evidence for the worthiness of the product.
There is not a single shred of independent, verifiable, objective or
factual evidence for any god.
===== @HotAirAce «There is more
factual evidence for recent violence by christians than there is for any god, The Babble or the jesus myth.»
There is more
factual evidence for recent violence by christians than there is for any god, The Babble or the jesus myth.
Not exact matches
It provides concrete,
factual evidence showing your idea
for a business is in fact sound and reasonable and has every chance of success.
You trust that these writers are in fact speaking
for God — without any actual
factual evidence.
austin that is not true since there is no
evidence of a spirit or soul or whatever please speak in terms of reality with
factual information from now on thanks he asked
for an honest response not a made up response
Where's the independent,
factual, objective and verifiable
evidence for the claimed extraordinary events at the time of the alleged crucifixion and resurrection of some dude allegedly named jesus?
Please provide
factual, verifiable, independent and objective
evidence for your god, retract your assertion or admit you are delusional (mentally ill) and / or a liar.
They just choose to pattern their lives as best they can after the one man, and yes, there is
factual evidence to prove Christ came to this horrible planet to try to make things better
for all.
It is far more significant to me that no believer, not even a top - dog charlatan shaman such as any Pope - A-Dope, can not provide
factual, independent, verifiable and objective
evidence for their cult's beliefs.
If you have
factual evidence, it should be able to speak
for itself.
No one yet has ever produced actual (physical, objective, independent, verifiable,
factual)
evidence for any alleged (but never proven) god.
Topher, Re: «hard questions» here's an easy one you have never been able to answer: «What
factual, independent, verifiable and objective
evidence is there
for any god?»
provided the slightest argument
for god, never mind objective
factual evidence.
If it is because you believe in an alleged supernatural being
for which there is no independent, objective,
factual or verifiable
evidence, then clearly it is you who is mentally ill, delusional and / or a liar.
So, in summary you don't actually have a proof, or even a single bit of
factual, verifiable, objective and independent
evidence for your unproven claims.
Save
for the
factual point that the Big Bang and evolution have been shown to have
evidence to support them.
Unless you have some verifiable, objective,
factual, independent
evidence for your claims, of course.
Now that people are more aware of how this scheme works it might be a different story, just as how more people are now aware of how the Bible was actually written and the actual age of the universe to actually accept it as completely
factual and as any kind of
evidence for a god.
Scientists have been able to provide
evidence for the Big Bang Theory, but not the singularity itself that the «big bang» spawned from... so Hawking's assumptions, are just that, assumptions and opinions... and he does not, as you say «tell the truth» based on a proven,
factual basis.
Clearly these are
for him
factual questions to be settled by such
evidence as we can acquire.
Rather than telling me what I think how about you providing some
factual, independent, verifiable and objective
evidence for your beliefs, or admit that you are mentally ill or a liar?
You, and not a single believer, can provide one bit of independent,
factual, verifiable or objective
evidence for your silly beliefs.
It's pure speculation, there is no
factual evidence here stating whether MLK Jr. was
for or against gay rights.
It assumes the existence of a superntural being
for which there is not a shred of objective, verifiable, independent or
factual evidence?
Enjoy your delusion - your imaginary friend will never return because no - one returns from the dead (and
for that there is
FACTUAL scientific
evidence).
Regardless of the cult or how many members the cult has, the answer is the same — there is not a single shred of objective,
factual, independent or verifiable
evidence for any of them.
Does your new version of the christian cult include
factual, verifiable, independent and objective
evidence for any god and a supernatural jesus, or is it just another pile of lies on top of myths?
Chad, you nor any other believer has a single bit of objective,
factual, verifiable or independent
evidence for any god or the alleged truth of The Babble — none, zip, nada, zero.
For the sole reason that as yet — to each their own — the benefits of factual evidence surpasses in my frame of mind NOT to accept your justification for needing o
For the sole reason that as yet — to each their own — the benefits of
factual evidence surpasses in my frame of mind NOT to accept your justification
for needing o
for needing one.
Will you also accept how wrong you got it
for always ignoring
factual evidence?
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but please don't use your opinion (which is an opinion — not a fact) to shame or scare people into doing or not doing something; especially if you do not have any
factual evidence (as opposed to «fake»
evidence — the foundation
for the entire anti-vaccinne movement has been debunked as scientifically inaccurate, so there is no data which backs up the claim that vaccines cause autism) to back up your stance.
You fell
for a line of propaganda with no
factual evidence behind it.
Your idea that the medical community would IGNORE
factual evidence supporting a legitimate cure
for a wide - spread disease is both offensive and a blatant lie.
Please re-examine the
factual evidence contained in this response and in other communications that you have received that explain why Common Core Standards are wrong
for Alabama.
What began to amuse me, after some months of research, was that even private schools that required no
evidence of intellectual ability
for admission were still insisting to me that all their students were gifted, when in fact they had no
factual basis
for saying so.
She likes the Core because it pushes students to use
factual evidence to support their ideas — a practice she's promoted
for years in Vermont schools through the Vermont Writing Collaborative.
They looked at a lot of research and, based on the
factual, empirical
evidence, sent home a letter to families that said: we see now, based on all these studies of children and learning, that all this homework does nothing
for our children's intellectual development.
A critical case study is
for the educators or the schools; investigative case study is
for the legal teams to provide the relevant
factual evidence.
For one to write a good quality research paper, they have to have
factual information with researched on
evidence to support the information.
Evidence of Insurability:
Factual information used by insurance companies to determine an applicant «ss qualification
for insurance.
That's conflating groupthink professional science / media's scholarly censorship of the truth with the search by some
for factual evidence and reliable climate models.
Maybe it would be open on the
evidence for the trier of fact to make that inference, but it wouldn't amount to a hill of beans, even a campfire's worth, unless the inference was of a necessary connection in which case «substantial» is meaningless, if the issue is
factual causation which is clearly what's referred to in para. 10 of Clements.
factual evidence which, while it may not require expertise
for its comprehension, is inextricably linked to
evidence that does;
If the district court decision relies on
factual underpinnings, however, such as
evidence concerning the «background science or the meaning of a term in the relevant art during the relevant time period -LSB-,]» it should make specific
factual findings and those findings are subject to review
for clear error:
That parent will have a second opportunity to make their case
for the proposed move at trial where they may well be in a position to adduce
evidence establishing that the present circumstances are having a deleterious impact on the child's physical or emotional needs; and having lost their initial chambers application, the moving parent no doubt will come away from the experience as a «dress rehearsal» having learned all the flaws and gaps in their
factual / legal presentation that they can improve upon and fill in
for the trial judge.
However, the only «principles» that he could have been referring to are (a) those which describe the nature of the
evidence that was required
for a valid decision on the issue of whether the nurses» negligence was a
factual cause and, then, (b) what test to use to decide if the
evidence is sufficient on the balance of probability.