This will help to provide
factual evidence of the personal property items you owned, the property items that were damaged or destroyed, and the condition of your personal belongings prior to your claimed loss.
Instead «necessity» becomes equivalent to what is likely to assist «efficient determination» of a case: «[47] The advantage of... this rule is that it avoids an over-rigid interpretation of necessity, where a skilled witness is put forward to present relevant factual evidence in an efficient manner rather than to give an opinion explaining
the factual evidence of others.
The proscription of terrorist organizations, including the application of criminal responsibility of its members, must be made on the basis of
factual evidence of activities that are of a genuine terrorist nature as well as of the actual involvement of the individuals concerned.»
It would be like always taking the word of the last person to see someone alive as
factual evidence of their demise.
Yeah, that makes much more sense than proven
factual evidence of evolution and geology which explains how the earth and all of the other planets were created and how life as we know it in all its forms evolved.
And secondly, Stephen Barr's point seems to be a real solution: that theologians need to learn the language of science - not just absorbing
the factual evidence of recent discoveries, but also the methodologies and modes of thought that scientists, whether quantum physicists or population geneticists, employ in their day - to - day grappling with problems in their fields.
Not exact matches
It provides concrete,
factual evidence showing your idea for a business is in fact sound and reasonable and has every chance
of success.
Here's my question: When can the repeated assertion
of falsehoods despite being confronted by
factual evidence be considered «lying»?
Most
of the current bullish arguments, unfortunately, are devoid
of factual historical
evidence.
There is a massive amount
of evidence that supports the «theory»
of evolution, and not a single piece
of factual, scientific
evidence that refutes it.
HotAirAce «An honest believer would preface their claims with something like «Despite not having a shred
of independent,
factual, objective or verifiable
evidence, I believe...»
this is far from
factual as there is
evidence of major floods all over the world.»
An honest believer would preface their claims with something like «Despite not having a shred
of independent,
factual, objective or verifiable
evidence, I believe...» Why are you a dishonest member
of the dead jew zombie vampire cannibal death cult aka christian?
I don't think you or anyone else has a shred
of factual, verifiable, objective or independent
evidence.
austin that is not true since there is no
evidence of a spirit or soul or whatever please speak in terms
of reality with
factual information from now on thanks he asked for an honest response not a made up response
Where's the independent,
factual, objective and verifiable
evidence for the claimed extraordinary events at the time
of the alleged crucifixion and resurrection
of some dude allegedly named jesus?
The existence
of God can only be dis - proven by
factual evidence, none
of which has been produced against it.
So, just a single piece
of factual, verifiable, independent, objective
evidence please.
«Attempts now to rewrite the story
of this hate crime appear to be based on untrustworthy sources,
factual errors, rumors and innuendo rather than the actual
evidence gathered by law enforcement and presented in a court
of law,» the spokesperson said.
But regarding the creation story, it makes specific
factual claims (albeit, internally contradictory when comparing the two different creation narratives) regarding the order
of creation which are directly contradicted by observable, physical
evidence, e.g. earth before sun, the order
of the appearance
of particular forms
of life, etc..
Reason,
evidence, scientific method — A commitment to the use
of critical reason,
factual evidence and scientific method
of inquiry in seeking solutions to human problems and answers to important human questions.
There are many prophecies in thousands
of religions that have regional and local fulfillment's throughout the thousands
of years
of recorded human history, however all
of them rely solely on self fulfillment and none have any
factual evidence to support any supernatural claims.
There can be no «
factual evidence»
of the supernatural, otherwise it woud simply be deemed natural.
Religion is illogical because after thousands
of years and many attempts to prove that any gods exist there is not one bit
of verifiable, independent, objective or
factual evidence to support the existence
of any god.
Creationism starts with the conclusion and, unable to find any
evidence to support it, makes sh it up or simply refuses to address the absence
of factual support.
Unless one
of you believers has some
factual, independent and verifiable
evidence of any god, given that such
evidence does not exist even after 2,000 + years
of various cults trying to come up with same, the probability
of any god existing is so small that to say «There are no gods!»
(b) Religion can make a statement, such as «there is one god comprised
of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make
factual assertions when supported by considerable
evidence;
So, in summary you don't actually have a proof, or even a single bit
of factual, verifiable, objective and independent
evidence for your unproven claims.
(b) Catholicism can make a statement, such as «God is comprised
of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make
factual assertions when supported by considerable
evidence;
I highly doubt you have any objective,
factual, independent or verifiable
evidence,
evidence that would stand up to the scientific method or be accepted by a court
of law as anything but hearsay.
I guess I'll know it when I see it, but as
of now, no one has ever presented me with anything that I can consider as actual,
factual evidence that the God
of the bible is real.
There is no verifiable, objective, independent,
factual evidence to support the existence
of any god.
@DWN,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, When I read the bible years ago, I went in with preconceived notion that there was some sort
of factual evidence, some consistency,....
Unless you have some verifiable, objective,
factual, independent
evidence for your claims,
of course.
In response to Mormonism where is the
factual evidence from what this Faith is based on: 1) Prove that reformed Eygptian is a true language 2) Provide a map showing the journey in American the Nephites and the Moronites took to establish themselves will validating their establisments 3) The Book
of Abraham has been proven false so why is still accepted as scripture 4) Joseph Smith was not a Jew or part
of the tribe Levi, but believed that the rights
of the priesthood was given to him.
(b) Religion can make a statement, such as «God is comprised
of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make
factual assertions when supported by considerable
evidence;
There is not a single bit
of factual, objective, independent or verifiable
evidence to support any
of the supernatural claims in The Babble.
Now that people are more aware
of how this scheme works it might be a different story, just as how more people are now aware
of how the Bible was actually written and the actual age
of the universe to actually accept it as completely
factual and as any kind
of evidence for a god.
Until you have tangible
evidence of the existence
of god, the notion
of god remains in the realm
of ideas... and thats a
factual statement!
delusion - A belief strongly held in spite
of invalidating
evidence (or lack thereof to the contrary) until you have tangible
evidence of the existence
of god, the notion
of god remains in the realm
of ideas... and thats a
factual statement!
factual evidence to support its existence) might think, or what a bunch
of self - righteous babble thumpers might think.
@hippypoet «until you have tangible
evidence of the existence
of god, the notion
of god remains in the realm
of ideas... and thats a
factual statement!»
You, and not a single believer, can provide one bit
of independent,
factual, verifiable or objective
evidence for your silly beliefs.
These are,
of course, speculative frameworks, based as much on stylized notions
of intellectual currents as on
factual evidence about either the past or the present.
It assumes the existence
of a superntural being for which there is not a shred
of objective, verifiable, independent or
factual evidence?
Choosing to believe one set
of tales is
factual while all others are just mythical requires an act
of faith, as no
evidence supports such a judgment, right?
AtheistHunter (first off FUCKTARD, you belong in an asylum): You make these claims without one shred
of factual evidence to back you and you have the audacity to call Atheists arrogant??? You're just a plain ignorant waste
of human flesh!!
Regardless
of the cult or how many members the cult has, the answer is the same — there is not a single shred
of objective,
factual, independent or verifiable
evidence for any
of them.
«Attempts now to rewrite the story
of this hate crime appear to be based on untrustworthy sources,
factual errors, rumors and innuendo rather than the actual
evidence gathered by law enforcement and presented in a court
of law.
In addition, the unmistakable
evidence is that the producers and handlers
of the tradition were not themselves primarily concerned with the
factual details.