Beginning with my five - year tenure as a federal law clerk and continuing as a member of the firm's Litigation practice group, I have had valuable and extensive experience presenting complex legal and
factual issues clearly and concisely.»
Not exact matches
Maybe it would be open on the evidence for the trier of fact to make that inference, but it wouldn't amount to a hill of beans, even a campfire's worth, unless the inference was of a necessary connection in which case «substantial» is meaningless, if the
issue is
factual causation which is
clearly what's referred to in para. 10 of Clements.
Whether or not as a consequence of the increasingly important
factual components of commercial contracts, by the mid-1990s the English courts
clearly felt the need to put to one side the proposition that the
issue in hand was simply one of law.
There's at least a half - dozen, maybe more, cases released since March 2007 in which the lawyers have argued about
factual causation, and the judges have written reasons dealing with
factual causation
issues, not mentioning the SCC's decision in Resurfice v Hanke 2007 SCC 7 and
clearly argued and decided based on the case law predating Resurfice.
While the example above
clearly has significant
factual issues, either party in a negligence lawsuit can bring a motion for summary judgment if there are no
issues of material fact or where it is clear that the other party can not prove one of the elements of negligence.