Given the normal level of deference to an agency's judgment as to
factual matters within its area of expertise, we think it would be very difficult to overturn EPA's use of the Social Cost of Carbon.
Not exact matches
Chad These are details contained
within a story, not «facts», unless you want to accept everything that the ancients wrote as
factual no
matter how outlandish?
But on
factual and policy
matters falling
within the specialized expertise of a decision - maker, it is clear, at least in Canada, that deference is now owed even on pure questions of law and constitutional
matters.