Sentences with phrase «factums used in court»

WestLaw, in this case, has identified this need and developed a product through its Litigator service, which provides legal precedents and factums used in court proceedings.

Not exact matches

I suppose some kind of disclaimer could be attached to the factums, of the kind used in the responsible press («these allegations have not been proved in court»)-- except that of course sometimes the allegations WILL have been proved in court — subject to the appeal, in any event....

The trial judge noted that the complainant only got angry after the alleged assault, and was far more upset when another person humiliated her that night (Crown factum, at para 65); for an excellent paper on the gendered nature of hysteria, see Jonnette Watson Hamilton, «The Use of Metaphor and Narrative to Construct Gendered Hysteria In the Courts» (2002) 1 Journal of Law 7 Equality 155.

Some courts even go beyond this content and use their websites to make additional materials available to the public, including appellate factums, transcripts, podcasts and in some specialized cases the pleadings.

In Dunkin Brands Canada Ltd. v. Bertico Inc., the Court of Appeal began its reasons with a dissection of the language used by the appellant in the factum, referring to «gross errors of law», evidence that was «almost completely ignored» and «blatant» mistakes of facIn Dunkin Brands Canada Ltd. v. Bertico Inc., the Court of Appeal began its reasons with a dissection of the language used by the appellant in the factum, referring to «gross errors of law», evidence that was «almost completely ignored» and «blatant» mistakes of facin the factum, referring to «gross errors of law», evidence that was «almost completely ignored» and «blatant» mistakes of fact.

In Dunkin Brands Canada Ltd. v. Bertico Inc., the Court of Appeal began its reasons with a dissection of the language used by the appellant in the factum, referring to «gross errors of law», evidence that was «almost completely ignored» and «blatant» mistakes... [morIn Dunkin Brands Canada Ltd. v. Bertico Inc., the Court of Appeal began its reasons with a dissection of the language used by the appellant in the factum, referring to «gross errors of law», evidence that was «almost completely ignored» and «blatant» mistakes... [morin the factum, referring to «gross errors of law», evidence that was «almost completely ignored» and «blatant» mistakes... [more]