In addition, the program supports inter-curricular faculty work by having traditional «doctrinal» faculty teach LA&W while at the same time traditional «legal writing»
faculty teach a doctrinal course, with members of both groups working together in regularly scheduled teaching meetings and in less formal settings.
Not exact matches
Instead, the LAWR I
faculty members would have the option of
teaching analysis and writing within a chosen
doctrinal area.
Not only do the lines between different types of
faculty members become blurred, the lines between the subjects of writing and the connected
doctrinal course become blurred as well, both in terms of program design and the various ways in which the connected courses are
taught together.
A number of well - written articles chronicle at least some of the history of legal writing in the law school curriculum.1 However, those articles were written with a different purpose in mind: the authors sought to employ history to show the pedigree of legal writing and argue for an equal place in the curriculum with
doctrinal courses and an equal position for its teachers with other «case - book»
faculty.2 Because of this purpose, they understandably focused a large part of their historical narrative on legal writing in the «modern law - school,» an entity that has existed only since the late 1800s.3 The articles paid considerably less attention to the era that preceded it, beyond brief mentions of the Inns of Court in England, apprenticeship in America, and the private law schools and early attempts at law
teaching that preceded Langdell's introduction of the case method.4
In the past two decades, the field of legal writing has made great strides within the academy.51 The course is now a required part of the law school curriculum, pursuant to the ABA's Standards for Approval of Law Schools.52 It is
taught, most often, by full - time
faculty who specialize in
teaching legal writing, and who, increasingly, have similar titles, benefits, and rights to participate in school governance as
faculty who
teach doctrinal courses.53
Now in 2010, I work as a tenured professor with colleagues on the tenure track;
teach 30 students in the legal writing courses and others in
doctrinal classes and seminars; have a «chair» attached to my job title; and am paid on an equal scale with other
faculty.4
Immediately before joining the School of Law's
faculty, she was a Visiting Clinical Professor of Law at Florida International University's College of Law, where she
taught in - house clinics in the areas of immigration and human rights and a
doctrinal course on immigration law.
Legal Analysis and Writing (formerly titled LAWR I),
taught by full - time
faculty members in the
doctrinal area of the professor's choice, introduces students to the structure of the American legal system and the sources of legal authority.
[2] ABA data suggest that 90 % of law
faculty who primarily
teach doctrinal courses (i.e., all 2013 full - time «
teaching resources» minus clinical, legal writing, and skills teachers) are tenured or on tenure track.
Similarly, the endless navel - gazing discussions about
teaching pedagogy, exam writing and exam - taking advice, practical credentials for
doctrinal faculty, curricular reform, law school rankings, and the very identity and purpose of a law school and its relationship to lawyering would benefit from some thought and understanding about the role of the LRW course.