Fail safe numbers (p = 0.05) ranged from 534 to 34,771 and exceeded the critical value.
Not exact matches
There are many uses for such a questionnaire, such as: a) helping place at - risk children (e.g., abused, neglected, diagnosed) with
safe and nurturing parents, b) potentially reducing the
number of
failed adoption placements, c) protecting children from at - risk adults, and d) screening foster / adoptive families to reduce the possibility of abuse and / or neglect.
Unfortunately, a
number of research articles that
failed to make this distinctive are used by ACOG to oppose home birth as a
safe option.
This brings us to red flag
number two — the studies that have found an increase in SIDS associated with bedsharing have
failed to control for all of the known safety factors that affect
safe bedsharing [8][9].
I'm usually the sort who doesn't really like to think about my outfit which is why I have a
number of
fail safe looks.
Given the
number of fancy features offered by these models, it would seem
safe to assume that vehicles equipped with such upmarket gadgetry would be more likely to
fail in long - term use due to their complexity and cutting edge technology.
Drivers who
fail to check their blind spots,
fail to follow a
safe distance behind motorcyclists, or who choose to unsafely turn in front of an oncoming cyclist are to blame for a
number of serious and sometimes fatal accidents.
Not having a
fail -
safe contact point, like a 1 - 800
number to call, makes this vending machine approach to service very frustrating.
(But even this isn't even a
fail -
safe solution, since Twitter notes that this action should only be conducted from «a small
number» of distinct accounts.)
This session will review the top ten background check trends and best practices for 2014 when it comes to
safe hiring, including the «Ban the Box» movement that eliminates criminal history question from job applications, updated Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Guidance on criminal records, the growing
number of class action lawsuits for
failing to perform background checks properly, and the use of social media searches for background checks.
Researchers suggest that meta - analysts calculate a tolerance level around a
fail -
safe N that is equal to 5 times the
number of effects included in the meta - analysis plus 10 (the «5k + 10» benchmark).18, 19 Moreover, the association between the standardized effect sizes and the variances of these effects was analyzed by rank correlation with use of the Kendall τ method.
To address the possible publication bias (ie, the fact that studies with nonsignificant results are less likely to be published), we computed the
fail -
safe N (Nfs) according to the method Orwin16 proposed, which is more conservative than the traditional Rosenthal Nfs.17, 18 Orwin's Nfs determines the
number of additional studies in a meta - analysis yielding null effect sizes that would be needed to yield a «trivial» OR of 1.05.
Additionally, a method to test whether the results of the analysis of the combined effect sizes are reliable is to calculate a
fail -
safe number (Rosenthal 1991), the
number of unpublished studies that have not been found with a non-significant result that will decrease the combined effect size to non-significant.
Furthermore, we calculated
fail -
safe numbers and analyzed whether outlying effect sizes were in our data base of studies on the basis of standardized z - values larger than 3.29 or smaller than − 3.29 (Tabachnick and Fidell 1989).
Fail -
safe numbers were calculated for each parenting category in order to estimate the
number of unpublished non-significant studies that would have to have been found in order to decrease the combined effect size to non-significant.