Sentences with phrase «failed predictions based»

Not exact matches

Anyone who claims to be able to accurately predict the future will fail if they base that prediction on data that is no longer relevant or current.

Now, my understanding of your position is that you made that original prediction based on the belief that the PRC would be instituting reforms to deleverage aggressively and transfer wealth to the consumer (such that the incorrect prediction was more that you were overly optimistic about the PRC's willingness to head off these systematic risks) and that your current prognosis of ~ 3 % GDP growth has an entirely separate causative element; that is to say, your previous prediction was based on the idea the PRC would be enacting reforms to ward off systematic risks, whereas your current estimation of GDP growth is instead based on the drag produced by these very systematic risks the PRC has failed to deal with.

The last time it disappointed, in the third quarter of last year, when it failed to meet its own prediction for new subscriber adds, it gave a strange excuse: the transition from mag - stripe to chip - based credit cards.

The segmentation theory of events, on which the published study is based, argues that the brain acts on the grounds of constant predictions based on previous experience; When these predictions fail, for example because there is an unexpected change of context, the brain interprets this moment as a boundary event, which delimits the neural coding of the lived experiences.

Looking back on the past three decades of test - based accountability, I have to qualify my early prediction that many teachers would fail.

If your year 10 stock market predictions based on P / E10 fail to work out, they will snap back by year 20.

Some years ago I presented a paper at a (mathematically based) conference that showed that a particular, machine learning, technical prediction technique failed badly in things like the «Tech wreck.»

However, both Ptolemeic astronomical predictions and cyclical fits to the climate inherently fail because their predictions are not based on physical sources of the cycles, but on the siren call of the beauty of cycles for cycles sake.

It is absurd that, with the experience of these other democracies before them, and at the very time when the whole IPCC CAGW meme is in a state of collapse that Obama has decided to side step Congress and force through by regulation carbon emission controls based on his naïve faith in the failed predictions of the IPCC process.

Every prediction that has failed from Malthus to club of Rome and now climate catastrophe was based on unlimited exponential growth as an assumption.

A science that is just based on journalists and politicians crying out loud and experts with a perfect track tecord of failed predictions is no science but a fascist dogma.

In the late 1960s, Paul Ehrlich famously made dire predictions of doom, based on his attempts to model the biosphere and our relation to it, which failed to materialise.

I think so, because a) humans are so damn ingenious, and b) necessity is the mother of invention, and c) neither Malthus, Paul Ehrlich, nor any other of the many failed «we're running out of resources» serial doomcasters have ever made one successful prediction of such a resource - based catastrophe.

And despite grim predictions, many do go on to law school, either with high hopes of graduating at the top of the class, or that somehow, based on their determination and work ethic, they'll find a job where many others of comparable credentials failed.