Not exact matches
While my efforts to persuade the Board of Selectmen, the town manager, and the Rec Department director to allocate permits in a more equitable fashion, and to
use their power to make sure that the programs
using town - owned facilities met minimum standards for inclusiveness and safety, fell on deaf ears (we ended up being forced to
use for our home games a dusty field the high
school had essentially abandoned), I returned to a discussion of the «power of the venue permit» 10 years later in my 2006 book, Home Team Advantage: The Critical Role of Mothers in Youth Sports, where I suggested that one of the best ways for youth sports parents to improve the safety of privately - run sports programs in their communities was to lobby their elected officials to utilize that power to «reform youth sports by exercising
public oversight over the
use of taxpayer - funded fields, diamonds, tracks, pools, and courts, [and] deny permits to programs that
fail to abide by a [youth sports] charter» covering such topics as background checks, and codes of conduct for coaches, players, and parents.
Charter
schools in Michigan are
failing to
use their freedom from state and local regulations to forge new directions in
public education, according to a report released last week by Michigan State University.
The court also
failed to distinguish the programs from other Arizona policies through which beneficiaries
use public funds to attend private and religious
schools.
Earlier this week, Stephanie Saul of the New York Times launched a full frontal assault on scholarship tax credit (STC) programs, accusing them of
failing to help low - income students, draining
public schools of needed funding, and of
using public money for private purposes.
Using their new authority, Bloomberg and Klein «dramatically» expanded the «availability of alternatives» to
failing public schools, increasing charters from 14
schools to 159 during Bloomberg's three terms, closing
failing schools, and making almost all of the city's high
schools «
schools of choice» (see Figure 2).
For sure, some of the author's analysis rings true: K — 12 education reformers sometimes try to scare the
public and policymakers into action (think «A Nation at Risk»), and the Right may
use the language of a «strict father» when arguing for testing, standards, and sanctions for
failing schools.
Cleveland's Saint Martin de Porres High
School accepts students who
use state - issued vouchers to escape
failing public schools.
«Far too often,
school leaders
fail to consider how technology might dramatically improve teaching and learning,» writes Ulrich Boser, the author of a Center for American Progress report on the
use of digital technology in
public schools.
Why have
public schools failed so far to put all this fancy new technology to good
use?
Q: Will private voucher and independent charter
schools be graded
using the same report cards as
public schools, and what will be the consequences for a
failing grade?
The strategy is becoming all too clear — ignore poverty, blame the effects of poverty on teachers, maintain the
public perception of
failing teachers and
schools with an A-F formula that is designed to rank order students so that the bottom 33 percent will always exist (no matter how much achievement gains are made),
use it to designate teachers and
schools with low grades, then create a red herring for an impatient
public by offering a placebo known as charter
schools and
school choice to appease them.
When lawmakers enacted the Opportunity Scholarships program back in 2013 to allow children from low - income families the chance to
use public dollars at private
schools, they included accountability provisions in the law that
fail to let the
public know if these privately - operated
schools are better — or worse — options than
public schools.
The program's original intention was to award vouchers to students attending
failing schools, but data shows the number students
using the vouchers who never attended a
public school grew.
Only when that has
failed, should alternative measures be invoked, including state takeover and expanded
use of
public charter
schools with consideration provided to hiring a qualified private contractor.
«It's not about
public schools failing, it's about the idea that people are meddling and
public schools aren't allowed to
use and do the things we're supposed to do,» he said.
Some of the most dramatic gains in urban education have come from
school districts
using a «portfolio strategy»: negotiating performance agreements with some mix of traditional, charter and hybrid
public schools, allowing them great autonomy, letting them handcraft their
schools to fit the needs of their students, giving parents their choice of
schools, replicating successful
schools and replacing
failing schools.
Wendy Lecker puts her finger on two things of great importance: first, certain of the power brokers in
public education in Connecticut are determined to increase the number of privately managed charter
schools, and they are
using every opportunity that presents itself — from the Sheff settlement to the Turnaround option in Obama's Race to the Top — to pursue just this goal; and second, a key factor in the advance of
school privatization is «the corporate education «reform» industry's narrative... that our
public education system is
failing.»
Although these
schools failed very the metric
used to judge
public schools, these charters were branded as «successes» and reauthorized.
Not to put too fine a point on it, the Louisiana Scholarship Program is a way to
use state money to support
failing, mainly Catholic, private
schools, while reducing support for
public education.
Such sentiments by Trump and DeVos, consistently expressed publicly, reinforce the myth that traditional
public education is broadly
failing students and that the answer is
using public money for privately run and / or owned
schools.
«So long as districts continue to ignore the crushing reality of the looming financial crisis at the hands of unfunded retiree liabilities, and so long as the Legislature
fails to fundamentally overhaul the authorizing structure in California, we anticipate that powerful special interests will continue to
use charter
public schools as a red herring to avoid the hard decisions that lie ahead,» continued Marquez.
The U.S. Department of Education wants its money back because the state
failed to
use the funds to build a database on
public school teachers, as it had promised.
«In working together with the parents and the charter
school operator to arrive at this decision,» said Desert Trails Parent Union lead coordinator Cynthia Ramirez in a press statement, «the
school board has set an example for other parents and districts across the country on how to
use Parent Trigger legislation to transform otherwise
failing public schools.»
Although this bill does require participating
schools to submit student test results to the SGOs, it
fails to require private
schools to
use the same tests as
public schools.
But he acknowledges inconsistency on his own side among those who
use test results to claim that
public schools are
failing.
Because the city's
public schools have, over many years,
failed to invest in proactive, positive approaches to discipline, they continue to
use suspensions to deal with minor infractions.
While Connecticut's privately owned charter
schools left the legislative session with a higher reimbursement rate for each student, more money for
school equipment, and funds to expand the number of charter
schools, Governor Malloy and the legislature
failed to come up with the money need to maintain existing services at Connecticut's
public magnet
schools, let alone fill the extra magnet
school classrooms that have been built and are ready to be
used this coming September.
FUSE was created in 2012 as a management company that
used public and private money to take over
failing, inner - city
public schools and operate them as
public charter
schools.
(Apart from cronyism, nepotism,
failing free
schools, fraudulent
use of
public funds, headteachers punishing children for their parents» failure to pay dinner money.....)
A voucher would give a kid a chance to opt out of a
failing public school and
use his education dollars to pay for a private
school of his choice.
Now Perry and his private company have been granted two lucrative «charters,» both of them to be paid
using tens of millions in
public funds, even though Perry's
school has consistently
failed to educate its fair share of Latinos, those with English Language challenges and those with special education needs.
It's ironic that many Florida parents who
use the Corporate Tax Credit Voucher, to leave their
failing D or F
schools, are not aware that private
school they choose is not any better than the
public school they are leaving.