Its not thye end of the world loosing to the spuds but what it does so is expose
the failings of certain people both on and off the pitch.
Not exact matches
It existed to fulfill
certain laws
of God, and when it
failed to do this faithfully, it could be called to task by the
people.
OR, might God choose to reveal truth through the experiences
of a
people who tried to be true to him,
certain moral principles,
failing again and trying again,
people looking for universal truths and communicating them to their children generation after generation, orally and through writing things down, organizing themselves into communities and societies, aiming for justice, teaching each other, defending their families, lives, cities, and governments.
Or someone else might say that the end
of everyone is the grave and that there is no more, and they employ the Future
Fail Fallacy, they might be
certain that the persecution
of religious
people and their faiths is scientifically necessary.
I did some research into how the word theopneustos was used in other Greek literature
of the time, and without
fail, it is used
of poets and philosophers who seem to speak with a
certain passion and urgency that makes
people listen and obey what they are saying.
Although ghetto and other poor
people are being served by many centers (one condition is that they must give help to anyone within a
certain geographic area), minority groups in particular have often viewed such services as being offered by an alien «university whitey» who, in their opinion,
fails to consult them about the kinds
of services they need.
People might hate this but what I want to see is getting rid
of players who aren't
certain to stay and players who have been here long enough but
failed to proove anything.
there is no doubting that Arsene has helped to provide us with some incredible footballing moments in the formative years
of his managerial career at Arsenal, but that certainly doesn't and shouldn't mean that he has earned the right to decide when and how he should leave this club... there have been numerous managers at each
of the biggest clubs in Europe throughout the last decade who have waged far more successful campaigns than ours yet somehow and someway each were given their walking papers because they
failed to meet the standards laid out by the hierarchy
of their respective clubs...
of course that doesn't mean that clubs should simply follow the lead
of others, especially if clubs
of note have become too reactionary when it comes to issues
of termination, for whatever reasons, but there should be some logical discourse when it comes to the setting
of parameters for a changing
of the guard... in the case
of Arsenal, this sort
of discourse was largely stifled when the higher - ups devised their sinister plan on the eve
of our move to the Emirates... by giving Wenger a free pass due to supposed financial constraints he, unwittingly or not, set the bar too low... it reminds me
of a landlord who says he will only rent to «professional
people» to maintain a
certain standard then does a complete about face when the market is lean and vacancies are up... for those who rented under the original mandate they
of course feel cheated but there is little they can do, except move on, especially if the landlord clearly cares more about profitability than keeping their word... unfortunately for the lifelong fans
of a football club it's not so easy to switch allegiances and frankly why should they, in most cases we have been around far longer than them... so how does one deal with such an untenable situation... do you simply shut - up and hope for the best, do you place the best interests
of those with only self - serving agendas above the collective and pray that karma eventually catches up with them, do you run away with your tail between your legs and only return when things have ultimately changed, do you keep trying to find silver linings to justify your very existence, do you lower your expectations by convincing yourself it could be worse or do you stand up for what you believe in by holding
people accountable for their actions, especially when every fiber
of your being tells you that something is rotten in the state
of Denmark
Commenting on reports
of the announcements the Prime Minister will make at a Downing Street Summit today about action proposed to be taken against
certain public service workers, including teachers, who
fail to report sexual abuse
of children and young
people, Chris Keates General Secretary
of the NASUWT the largest teachers» union in the UK said: «No one can
fail but to be shocked by the horrific abuse
of young girls revealed by recent investigations, including the Report today on Oxfordshire.
Not everyone has a reasonable understanding
of what it really costs to visit a
certain area, especially in the case
of people from low cost -
of - living areas visiting high cost -
of - living areas, so even some well - intentioned visitors may
fail on this point.
When immunization rates drop below the critical level, disease can strike not only unvaccinated individuals but also vaccinated ones, because all vaccines
fail to confer immunity in a
certain percentage
of people.
Ironically, Neitz had once rejected this idea because it
failed to explain why
people lacking a
certain type
of photoreceptor still showed normal sensitivity when exposed to that shade
of light.
While studies already showed that
people whose diets were rich in foods high in vitamin C — typically 200 mg per day — have a lower risk
of heart disease,
certain cancers and other diseases, clinical trials testing isolated doses
of synthetic C have mostly
failed to find any protective benefit against disease.
Only one character and the audience know who Cassius is, leading to numerous instances
of the assassin speaking in the third
person about the nature
of a cold - blooded, remorseless killer (attributes that the character repeatedly
fails to follow up on) and others making too fine a point on how well
certain characters seem to intrinsically understand the mind
of a cold - blooded, remorseless killer.
Each fund will be required in
certain cases to withhold at the applicable withholding rate and remit to the U.S. Treasury the withheld amount
of taxable dividends and redemption proceeds paid to any shareholder who (1)
fails to provide a correct taxpayer identification number certified under penalty
of perjury; (2) is subject to withholding by the Internal Revenue Service for failure to properly report all payments
of interest or dividends; (3)
fails to provide a certified statement that he or she is not subject to «backup withholding;» or (4)
fails to provide a certified statement that he or she is a U.S.
person (including a U.S. resident alien).
I think what's happening is that
people are looking at it, and are beginning to understand and kind
of pick up where I think the environmental movement
failed — the a sustainability movement is, I think, a much more healthy model, and it includes both government and corporate practice, as well as what the environmentalists and
certain citizens.
In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025
of 26 % to 28 % clearly
fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report on which the US likely relied upon to establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable
people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation
of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US law not on what is required
of it as a mater
of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually
certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation
of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.
The short answer is that economics is really the study
of how
people make decisions, and so I would say that economics would provide you with several ways
of instituting the change that you are seeking and also a means to understand why
certain solutions are doomed to
fail.
And, non-lawyers (even sophisticated, affluent business
people) routinely
fail to grasp that a Will only governs assets which don't have beneficiary designations and is subject to forced marital share and minimum family inheritance laws that act by operation
of law as well as other «gap filling» presumptions that modify the literal meaning
of certain kinds
of language in a Will.
In order to recover damages in a negligence case, the
person filing the claim (the plaintiff) must prove: 1) the defendant had a duty to act a
certain way; 2) the defendant
failed to act according to that duty; 3) the plaintiff was injured as a result; and 4) the plaintiff suffered losses and expenses due to that injury.Attorney J. Todd Tenge has been handling personal injury claims for Boulder, Denver, and Fort Collins residents for 20 years, and has a consistent track record
of very successful outcomes.
When a
person or entity
fails to exercise a
certain level
of care to protect others against the risk
of unreasonable harm, they may be deemed negligent and could be held liable for any resulting damages should an accident occur.
Eventually, the Ontario Court
of Appeal found that
certain provisions
of the MMAR were contrary to the rights to liberty and security
of the
person under s. 7
of the Charter, as they
failed to provide reasonable access to a legal source
of supply
of marihuana for medical purposes, required some applicants to have the support
of two specialists to establish medical need (depending on the nature
of their illness), and exposed those in need
of medical marihuana to criminal liability if they could not comply with the MMAR (see Hitzig v. Canada (2003), 231 D.L.R. (4th) 104, 2003 CanLII 30796 (ON C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [2004] S.C.C.A. No. 5).
If
certain members
of the group
fail to pay on time, it is best to cancel their reservations or find other
people to replace them.
Life insurance is a contract providing for payment
of a sum
of money to the
person assured or,
failing him, to the
person entitled to receive the same, on the happening
of certain event.
Possibly a simple oversight made by a world
of people who are so captivated by new technologies that they
fail to fully consider the consequences, it seems that many consider
certain forms
of distracted driving, such as the usage
of cell phones, to be normal and acceptable behavior.