The failure of a property owner to maintain their premises, clear their ice, or keep their grounds in a proper state of repair may give rise to a claim for damages.
Not exact matches
The city is in the process
of foreclosing on 370
properties in four boroughs due to their
owners»
failure to keep up with tax...
The Anambra State Government on Saturday sealed - up nine buildings in the commercial city
of Onitsha following
failure of the
owners to pay
property rates amounting to...
The only events that can trigger a foreclosure in Minnesota are default in payments,
failure to pay
property taxes or insurance, or damage by the
owner to the value
of the
property.
Under no circumstances will the sites or the Chopra parties be liable to you for any loss or damages
of any kind that are directly or indirectly related to the sites, the materials in the sites, the downloadable items, user content, your use or inability to use, or the performance
of the sites, any action taken in connection with an investigation by the sites or law enforcement authorities regarding your use
of the sites, and action taken in connection with copyright or other intellectual
property owners, any errors or omission in the sites, technical operation, or any damage to any users computer, hardware, software, wireless devices, cellular phone, modem or other equipment or technology, including without limitation damage from any security breach or from any virus, bugs, tampering, fraud, scam, error, omission, interruption, defect, delay in operation or transmission, computer line or network
failure or any other technical or other malfunction, even if foreseeable or even if the sites or Chopra parties have been advised
of or should have known
of the possibility
of such damages, whether in an action
of contract, negligence, strict liability or tort.
All reservations are subject to change or cancellation if rooms become unavailable for reasons including, but not limited to, natural disasters or other acts
of nature, damage to the
property or maintenance problems, strikes,
owner usage, sale
of unit, changes in applicable law, or
failure of other guests to vacate as scheduled.
Failure to comply will result in immediate removal
of pet and
owner from the
property, without refunds, and added fees applied for any extra cleaning and damages.
The appellate court explained that the elements
of a premises liability claim are: (1) there was actual or constructive notice to the
owner of the defects causing the injury, (2) the defects created an unreasonable risk
of getting hurt, (3) the
property owner failed to use reasonable care to get rid
of or reduce the risk, and (4) the
property owner's
failure to utilize reasonable care was the proximate cause
of the plaintiff's injuries.
When you have been injured on someone else's
property, such as a retail store, an office building or even someone's house, because
of the
owner's
failure to keep the
property safe and secure, you may be entitled to receive your medical bills, lost wages and pain and suffering.
In Nevada, a person who was injured as a result
of an
owner's
failure to maintain his or her
property only has
Failure to do so could be viewed as negligence in the eyes
of the law and may make the
property owner liable if someone gets hurt.
If you become injured due to a
property owner's
failure to maintain safe conditions, including inadequate security
of broken stairways he or she may be held responsible for your losses.
When slip and fall accidents occur due to improperly maintained
property, When accidents occur due to
failure to maintain
property, the
owner of the
property can often be found liable for resulting damages.
Regardless
of the location, if you have been injured as a result
of a
property owner's
failure to meet their legal duty under Virginia premises liability law, we can help.
We have obtained jury verdicts and settlements in the millions
of dollars on behalf
of personal injury victims who suffer from serious injuries as a result
of a
property owner's
failure to do so.
Failure to maintain safe premises constitutes a breach
of that duty, and an individual suffering an injury as a result
of an unsafe condition may be able to hold the
property owner legally liable.
The Court found that the discriminatory operation
of the Mining Act lay in the
failure in the legislation creating the rights to confer a right to compensation to native title holders for the appropriation
of their
property in the same way compensation was provided to other
owners and occupiers
of the land for the loss and damage they suffered as a result
of mining.
However, home
owners in other states could benefit from the ruling given that Judge Fallon said, «In the present cases, the Chinese - manufactured drywall has caused a «distinct, demonstrable, physical alteration»
of the plaintiffs» homes (the covered
properties) by corroding the silver and copper elements in the homes, often to the point
of causing total or partial
failure in electrical wiring and devices installed in the homes, as well as by emitting odorous gases.»
(4) The
failure of the public or private water supplier to provide such statement within such ten business day period shall: (A) Cause any lien for unpaid charges provided by this Code section to be extinguished and to be
of no force or effect as to the title acquired by the purchaser or lender, if any, and their respective successors and assigns in the transaction contemplated in connection with such request; and (B) Prevent the public or private water supplier from denying water services to the new real
property owner or tenant.
The
failure of the current NWP 26 process to distinguish between different types
of activity has been a problem for
property owners and developers required to mitigate impacts to wetlands, say practitioners close to the issue.
The Supreme Court
of the United States has considered whether the State
of Arkansas («State») properly seized a residential
property for the
owner's
failure to pay taxes, even though the State knew that the
owner had not received notice about the State's intent to seize the
property.
The
Owners argued the Broker had a duty to make these payments for the duration
of the listing agreement and the Broker's
failure to make these payments compelled the auction
of the
property before the expiration
of the listing agreement.
A Tennessee appellate court has considered whether an
owner of a
property was held liable for agent's
failure to properly disclose flooding on the
property in the purchase agreement.
Renee Despins Realty, Inc. v. Roberts (1 A.D. 3d 211)- broker's exclusive brokerage agreement with
owner provided for commission for the sale
of a condominium upon closing
of title or a willful
failure to close; brokerage agreement excepted named buyer from exclusive agreement; named buyer purchased the
property during the term
of the exclusive; dismissal
of broker's complaint unanimously affirmed where brokerage agreement expressly excepted the purchasers from its operation
214 DOS 97 Matter
of DOS v. Laymon - accounting to client; bad check; deposits;
failure to pay judgments; proper business practices; jurisdiction; DOS retains jurisdiction after expiration
of license (for
failure to pay renewal fee) where acts occurred during licensure; violation
of 19 NYCRR 175.1 by depositing clients» funds into operating account and failing to maintain special bank account; violation
of 19 NYCRR 175.2 for failing to account to client; broker engaged in fraudulent practices by accepting monies he was required to retain in escrow, depositing said monies into his operating account, failing to return same to its rightful
owner and by purporting to make refunds by issuing bad checks; in light
of broker's financial inability to do so,
failure to promptly satisfy judgments was not a demonstration
of untrustworthiness; there was no violation
of 19 NYCRR 175.3 (b) where broker was not managing rental
properties; real estate broker's license revoked; reapplication for broker's license conditioned upon proof
of payment
of restitution with interest and proof
of satisfaction
of judgment with interest
He'll cover: • Loan modification
failures and the unresolved pile
of properties it left behind • Percentages
of delinquent loans and REOs sold in a bulk • Delinquent loans destined to becoming REOs or short sales • The staggering loss per
property for Fannie Mae in California • The status
of NSP and First Look programs • Length
of stay for delinquent
owners • Negative equity mix in California • The mix
of REO vs short sales • And a lot more
112 DOS 99 Matter
of DOS v. Dorfman - adjournments; proper business practices;
failure to appear at hearing;
failure to cooperate with DOS investigation; accounting to client; ex parte hearing may proceed upon proof
of proper service; individually licensed broker seeking to conduct brokerage business under a name other than his own must apply for a license under such new name; broker engaged in the leasing
of real
property through an unlicensed corporation; broker failed to cooperate with DOS investigation by failing to respond to DOS letters and telephone calls; complaint alleges broker failed to provide an accounting or copies
of records
of management for
owner's
property; broker may be required to return commissions and fees received which he is not entitled to; $ 1,000.00 fine and suspension
of broker's license until such time as broker establishes he has fully complied with DOS's investigation and made a full and satisfactory accounting to
owner, shall have paid to
owner all money due and owning to him as established by the accounting, with interest, and shall have refunded to
owner all commissions and other fees, with interest, paid
Your lease to the actual tenant in a sub-lease arrangement should address insurance and provide a hold marmless and indemnification agreement to relieve you
of any laibility arising out
of any
property issues as you are not the
owner and act simply as a manager and agreeing to be responsible for only those losses arising from any
failure to managment issues.