The Federal Government had on January 18, 2018 filed a suit marked FHC / ABJ / CR / 4/2018 containing two counts of
failure of the defendants to declare their assets «without reasonable excuse and upon the notice to declare» them before the panel.
Also, he averred that upon the persistent
failure of the defendants to liquidate their indebtedness, Sterling Bank instructed its counsels to recover the debt.
Fayemi's action follows
the failure of the defendants to retract the said libelous statements and tender public apology as demanded by his counsel, Rafiu Oyeyemi Balogun, in a letter dated November 19, 2016.
Castorina argues that the plaintiffs and others are «being denied their right to vote for a representative in the vacant 11th Congressional District in New York due to
the failure of defendant to comply with mandatory provisions of Article I, Section II, Clause IV of the United States Constitution and the New York Public Officers Law Section 42 [3],» according to court documents.
In light of the defendant's failure and unwillingness to comply with the order made by Stinson J., its late disclosure of important documents, counsel's uncivil conduct leading up to and at the trial, and the repeated
failures of the defendant's counsel to comply with the directions and orders of the court, it is appropriate for the court to exercise its discretion to deny the successful defendant its costs.
The Court held that defendants» alleged failures were really
failures of the defendants to perform their obligations under the shareholders» agreement, and not true misrepresentations.
Obtained by the claimant as a result of
the failure of a defendant to comply with the requirements of a claim i.e. reply or pay within a 14 day period after service of the claim
The success or
failure of the defendant in this case will have significant consumer implications.
Not exact matches
Specifically,
Defendants made false and / or misleading statements and / or failed to disclose that: (i) Akorn's
failure to comply with FDA data integrity requirements would jeopardize Fresenius» acquisition
of Akorn; (ii) the Company lacked effective internal controls over financial reporting; and (iii) as a result
of the foregoing, Akorn shares traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, and class members suffered significant losses and damages.
He ordered that the condition given must be met within 14 days
failure of which the
defendants would be remanded in prison custody.
«The
defendants will likely attempt to argue that de Blasio was not charged because
of some inferred concern about Singh, and attempt to use the
failure to prosecute as an attack on Singh's credibility,» the motion said.
He judge also ordered that the bail conditions must be met within 14 days
failure of which the
defendants would be remanded in prison custody.
The arraignment
of the
defendants was stalled on Tuesday due to the
failure of the DSS to produce Suswam in court.
As the
Defendant publishers and their physical book distribution systems get smaller and less profitable, competitors like Barnes & Noble teeter on the Borders
of financial
failure, and Apple becomes bored with an iBookstore whose marketplace it can not control by illegal means, Amazon's share
of the total book trades market only grows, and grows, and grows.
«This is a class action arising out
of Defendants»
failure to perform the material terms
of an offer made to Plaintiff and other consumers comprising the class for a Starwood Preferred Guest («SPG»)- branded American Express credit card; namely, the promise
of 35,000 hotel loyalty points, called SPG Starpoints, in exchange for $ 5,000.00 in qualifying purchases made to the card during the first six months after issuance,» Heilman said in the filing.
On Jan. 30, Central District
of California Judge Dale Fischer held a hearing on the
defendants» motion seeking sanctions, dismissal
of certain counts
of the lawsuit and an adverse instruction to the jury based on the government's
failure to preserve evidence.
The next day, a Birmingham, Ala., lawyer for Wachovia named Carl S. Burkhalter filed a motion to set aside the default, explaining that a perfect storm involving the resignation
of his associate and the unexplained
failure of an email «auto - forward» function from the associate's email account to his secretary led to the date for
defendant's Answer to the Amended Complaint not being entered on his calendar.
Answer: Well, you could lose the lawsuit, owe the
defendants $ 150,000 for their legal costs and expenses, and then have members
of the congregation petition you into bankruptcy over your
failure to pay their legal fees.
The probability
of wrongful convictions is increased by increasing numbers
of defendants in the courts without lawyers, which is due to: (a) very poor government funding
of legal aid programs; and, (b) law societies»
failure to attempt to solve the unaffordable legal services problem — the one aggravates the damage done by the other.
Otis alleged that these
failures caused a judgment to enter against Cusick and that the judgment was obtained as a result
of the
defendant lawyer's negligence.
However, eight
of those reasons were circumstances that arose after the commencement
of the action and were thus irrelevant to the analysis (the
defendant's offer to settle; the
defendant's
failure to apply to move the action to the Small Claims Court; the
defendant's denial
of liability for the plaintiff's injury; the insurer's characterization
of the collision as low impact; the exchange
of 60 documents; the
defendant's motion for a Rule 66 hearing and eventual removal; a Rule 28 examination
of a witness; and the absence
of expert evidence tendered by the
defendant).
The
Defendant Wiebe brought an application to dismiss the lawsuit for want
of prosecution (
failure to prosecute in a timely fashion).
the need for the plaintiff to have legal counsel, in light
of the
defendant's denial
of liability, dispute as to causation, injury or loss and allegations
of contributory negligence, pre-existing conditions, previous causes and a
failure to mitigate.
No Prejudice In Arguing All
Defendants Should Be Liable /
Failure to Claim Tort
of Another Fee Damages At Trial Dispositive Against Fee Petitioner.
In most places, including the state
of California, you will have to show the
defendant failed to exercise an acceptable amount
of care and that
failure caused your injury.
accept that during 1976... the
defendant should have appreciated that the claimant was at risk
of an asbestos related injury and that their
failure to appreciate and take what would now be regarded as appropriate precautions or to make enquiries about the nature
of the dust was negligent».
The court
of appeals reversed summary judgment for
defendant, holding that 1) the district court erred in its analysis
of whether a witness's statement was made in reaction to a truly startling event, and whether the statement was made under the stress
of excitement caused by that event; and 2) there was a genuine issue
of material fact as to whether
defendant's
failure to remove the stump was a proximate cause
of plaintiff's accident.
Negligence is the
failure to observe reasonable care, and since people ordinarily act reasonably, the plaintiff or
defendant may introduce evidence
of a custom that is relevant to the issue
of negligence.
In all the circumstances it decided that there should be no costs penalty for the
Defendant as a result
of that
failure.
Possible legal theories that can be argued in a products liability case include negligence (lack
of reasonable care in the manufacture or sale
of the product or in warning about the product), breach
of warranty (
failure to fulfill the terms
of a promise regarding the product's performance), misrepresentation (giving consumers a false sense
of security about a product's safety), and strict liability (under which the product's defect, although not the fault
of the
defendant, rendered the product unreasonably dangerous and the
defendant is therefore responsible).
The
defendant, through action or
failure to act, was guilty
of gross misconduct in connection with the
failure to make timely disclosure.
Factors basic to the exercise
of this discretion are whether the
defendants would suffer prejudice if the use
of the journal was permitted, and whether there was a reasonable explanation for the plaintiff's
failure to disclose it.
Thus, the one - and two - year statutes
of limitations on Plaintiff's claims, which are based on
Defendant's alleged
failures to promote him, began to run in August 2009 when
Defendant denied Plaintiff the promotion in the Madison, Wisconsin location.
Verdict in Queens County for a newborn who suffered neurological injuries as a result
of the
defendant hospital's
failure to timely perform a cesarean section for fetal distress.
It is recognised that it is unlikely that this power will be widely used as by the time the matter has reached the courts, the relevant enforcement authority may have taken action, in the form
of Improvement and / or Prohibition Notices / Orders, and / or the
defendant company may have addressed the
failures themselves to ensure the future safety
of their employees.
The
defendant firm
of accountants was negligent by its
failure to discover misappropriations
of clients» monies when preparing the solicitor's accounts.
To prevail, the plaintiff's attorney must show that the
defendant failed to operate his or her vehicle according to a specific standard
of care at the time
of the accident and that this
failure caused the victim's death.
Because the plaintiff's policy was in suspension due to non-payment
of the premium, the
defendant, pursuant to its policy, never notified plaintiff that his policy would be terminated for
failure to have the inspection.
Once your attorney has established that the
defendant failed to use due care, they will show that this
failure was the cause
of your injuries.
After showing that the
defendant did not drive with appropriate care and skill, the family's attorney must prove that this
failure was the cause
of the victim's death.
Plaintiff paid the overdue premium, and
defendant sent him a notice
of termination
of coverage for
failure to pay the premium and a notice
of reinstatement
of coverage.
[29] The legislature chose not to provide a specific cost consequence for an insurer's
failure to participate in mediation, such as substantial indemnity costs against a losing
defendant or deprivation
of full costs
of a winning
defendant.
However, the
failure of the claimant to keep the
defendant informed that the costs budget had been significantly exceeded was fatal to a claim for a recovery in excess
of the estimate.
Moreover, a highway accident attorney in Boston must show that the
defendant's
failure to use due care was a substantial cause
of the victim's injuries.
To file a claim, these injuries must have occurred due to the
defendant's
failure to exercise the duty
of reasonable care.
2008)-- Denial
of manufacturer
defendant's motion for summary judgment in cases arising from explosion at facility in Groton, Connecticut on grounds that there existed genuine issues
of fact as to product liability and recklessness counts
of case against manufacturer based on its claimed
failure to account for and disclose relevant safety and storage information
of risks involved in the transport and storage
of chemical reagent at ambient temperatures.
It also took notice
of the plaintiff's apparent
failure to respond to the motion to dismiss, which could potentially have addressed the subsequent
defendant's timeliness defense.
The
failure to honour the spirit
of the settlement agreement was considered reprehensible conduct deserving
of rebuke and special costs were awarded against the
defendant by Master Taylor sitting as Registrar.
No. 766 dealt with the principle
of discoverability in the context
of a claim for damages related to a slip - and - fall accident that occurred as a result
of the
defendant's alleged
failure to properly clear snow and ice.
Our firm represents
defendants in County and Circuit Court in defense
of Felonies; Misdemeanors; Juvenile Crimes; Violation
of Probation; Firearms, Weapons and Gun Charges; Sex Crimes; Prostitution, Solicitation, & Pandering; Rape; Sexual Assault and Sexual Battery; Stalking;
Failure to Register as a Sex Offender; Child Abuse.