«Indeed controversial» is academic language; but to politicians, this sounds like «praising with
faint damnation» — a politician is apt to assume «is indeed controversial» means «is a hot research area» rather than «was asserted in one paper that used at best controversial methods to reach its claimed conclusion» — eh?
It's so sweet of you to praise me with
faint damnation, sweet boy!
Not exact matches
Don't interpret that as
damnation by
faint praise, however.
I hope you don't mind me saying, it seems like
damnation by
faint praise to just say that his preso makes you go «wow» because it would sure be a big deal if it was true, but then you immediately beg off any responsibility for evaluating the quality of his reasoning.