"Fair characterization" refers to describing something or someone accurately and without bias or prejudice. It means presenting a fair and balanced representation, taking into consideration all relevant qualities, strengths, weaknesses, and perspectives.
Full definition
I consider there to be considerable value in constructing one's argumentation evenly; the winning - over of a reader is more lasting and powerful when,
though fair characterization, you enable the reader to come to your opinion organically (as opposed to leading the reader by stick and carrot).
I think that's
a fair characterization of the elimination of 80 stores that once sold only 100 % Rainforest Alliance certified coffee and switching 88 other stores to what are currently mostly «mystery sourced» beans.
Is
that a fair characterization?
Do you think that's
a fair characterization?
Is
that a fair characterization?
Is
that a fair characterization?
Could you talk about why you don't think that is
a fair characterization of the situation?
Is
that a fair characterization, and what were your foundational experiences that fostered that sensibility?
I haven't read the book (or its appendix), so consider me ignorant, but — Is this paraphrase of Crichton's argument
a fair characterization?
I'll leave it to others to argue the extent to which this has been, in the past,
a fair characterization.
Would this be
a fair characterization of your new expanded view?