Sentences with phrase «fair court orders»

Otherwise, court litigation is costly in terms of money, time, emotional stress, reduced opportunity for long - term cooperation, and less - fair court orders.

Not exact matches

If so, in its discretion, the court can order a new child support amount which would be fair to both parents.

After years of legal wrangling between Westchester County and the federal government over a court - ordered 2009 settlement to meet fair housing requirements, federal officials appear to have stopped fighting.

But Albany lawmakers have yet to fulfill the mandate in their budgets, and city schools continue to be owed $ 4.3 billion after more than a decade since the court ordered fair funding.

He is also asking the Court for a declaration that an order by the Attorney General of the Federation and one Obono Obla of the Presidential Task Force on Recovery of Government Properties compelling him to vacate the aforesaid property without affording him a fair hearing, amounted to a denial of his fundamental human rights, unconstitutional and void.

In an unusual move designed to make criminal trials fairer, state Court of Appeals Chief Judge Janet DiFiore issued a new rule requiring judges to forcefully order prosecutors to search their files and disclose all evidence favorable to the defense at least 30 days before major trials.

He held that the lower court was in grievous error when it ordered the publication of Ibrahim's name pointing out that the decision of the high court was in total breach of the provision of section 36 of the 1999 constitution, which it said forbade any court from denying fair hearing to a party likely to be affected by final decision of the court.

As a result, desegregation and integration policies were mandated by the Supreme Court in order to create an equal and fair education for black Americans and other minorities in the United States (Wells et.

The idea behind # 2 is that state courts could sometimes favor litigants from their own states, so in situations where there is a great deal at risk, and where one party is in their home state and the other is not, federal courts allow litigants into federal court in order to provide a fair forum.

Family Court can make many types of orders that do not fall into that category, but there is still a fair chance that the $ 10,000.00 order is not dischargeable.

By requesting, obtaining or using a Credit Card from us you agree that we may release information in our records regarding you and your Credit Account: (a) to comply with government agency or court orders; (b) to share your credit performance with credit reporting agencies and other creditors who we reasonably believe are or may be doing business with you on your Credit Account; (c) to provide information on your Credit Account to any third party who we believe is conducting an inquiry in accordance with the Federal Fair Credit Reporting Act; (d) to share information with our employees, agents or representatives performing work for us in connection with your Credit Account; or (e) as otherwise permitted by the Bank's privacy policy.

(It is a fair assumption that Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., was not in favor of rehearing; in an in - chambers order he issued on an earlier procedural matter in the detainees cases [applications 06A1001 and 06A1002] on April 26, Roberts opined that «possible court action» in the D.C. Circuit Court would not be enough to justify a grant of review in the face of the April 2 dencourt action» in the D.C. Circuit Court would not be enough to justify a grant of review in the face of the April 2 denCourt would not be enough to justify a grant of review in the face of the April 2 denial.)

To identify problems and advocate for systemic changes in the divorce and family court systems in order to make them fair, user friendly, accountable, and affordable;

Ninth Circuit rejects amicus brief from Amazon.com, et al. on rehearing en banc in Fair Housing Council v. Roommates.com: Some people may be wondering what is the meaning of this published order that Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued today.

In order to protect your right to a fair recovery, you must file a negligent security case in an Iowa state court before the statute of limitations expires, and that filing must meet all of the court's requirements.

We will help to inform the court of the circumstances concerning your child support matter, and pursue a fair and appropriate order or modification.

It's fair to say Google won't take down the site and will not disclose info unless they're ordered to do so by court of law.

So the author is asking the Court of Justice of the EU to require the Italian courts to set aside M.A.S and M.B's human right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by the Italian Constitution, in order to pursue the policy goal of efficient tax collection, because, in the author's interpretation of global law, such efficient tax collection is also in the service of fundamental rights which Prof. Capaldo interprets as also present in the global legal order.

It is for the court, in its discretion, to decide whether it is fair and just to make the order in the light of the considerations set out above.

HAMALENGWA — Findings of Professional Misconduct — While representing a difficult client who was charged with first degree murder, the Lawyer was eligible to bill the Ministry of the Attorney General for fees and disbursements pursuant to a Fisher order — The Lawyer's accounting, billing and docketing systems were deplorable and bore no relationship to his billings to the Ministry — The Lawyer engaged in professional misconduct by billing the Ministry for attendances at court when he had not attended or attended for less time than he claimed; overbilling for legal research; billing for services that were not properly billable as legal services; overbilling for student assistance disbursements he had not incurred; overbilling for fees and disbursements that were not fair and reasonable; and submitting a document to the Ministry purporting to be an invoice from a student working under his direction when the invoice was not prepared by the student and the services were not rendered as described in the document.

Mr. Dougall was ordered by the court to obtain appraisals of two parcels of property owned by the parties and, further, to pay Mrs. Dougall a fair share of the equity in the parcels.

Support for live - blogging courtroom proceedings and discrediting class distinctions drawn in this regard also stems from a promotion of the model of discursive democracy outlined above in Part I. Drawing on the work of theorists including Lon Fuller, recall that the Supreme Court of Canada and legal scholars such as Jeremy Waldron held that the fair functioning of the liberal democratic order required civilian access to information and the attendant opportunity to deliberate upon that information critically.

The Court suggested that the non-publication order in the present case be scaled back (by agreement of the parties) as it unnecessarily covered information that would not have a negative impact on fair trial rights, i.e. background information that is readily available to and known to the public.

Lastly, the court concluded at para. 203 - 5 that the legislative scheme under Part I was not procedurally fair: «The biggest deficiency lies in the failure to provide a respondent whose identity is known or easily ascertainable with notice of and opportunity to participate in the initial protection order hearing.»

If we are retained to represent you, our attorneys will gather all evidence needed to support your case in court and all potential evidence will be investigated and preserved in order to maximize full and fair compensation.

According to previous case law of the Constitutional Court, the right to a fair trial in the Spanish Constitution requires that, if a person has been convicted in his absence, a surrender for the execution of that conviction must be made conditional on the right to challenge the conviction in order to safeguard that person's rights of defence, even if he had given power of attorney to a lawyer who effectively represented him at the trial (paras 20 and 22).

As a result of the decision in R (Binyan Mohamed) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] EWHC 2048 (Admin), the Divisional Courts made Norwich Pharmacal [1974] Ac 133) order, requiring disclosure by the foreign secretary of material which it considered was essential to a fair trial in criminal proceedings in the US for terrorist offences.

(Order, p. 30, citing Hudson v. Louisiana, 450 U.S. 40, 44 (1981)-RRB- In Hudson the court also held that «a reversal due to failure of proof at trial, where the State received a fair opportunity to offer whatever proof it could assemble, bars retrial on the same charge.»

The practice of the Human Rights Committee with respect to State reporting obligations indicates its tendency to scrutinise closely «special» or «extraordinary» criminal courts in order to ascertain whether they ensure compliance with the fair trial requirements of Article 14.

As he humbly recounts his heroic accomplishments of cleaning up the traffic court, instituting night court for criminal drug cases in order to best use limited resources in the fairest manner, and presiding over the historical impeachment trial of former Governor Rod Blagojevich, Justice Fitzgerald repeatedly reminds lawyers that they are guardians or champions of the legal process.

In Hamilton - Wentworth District School Board v. Fair, 2014 ONSC 2411, the Divisional Court considered, among other things, whether the order to reinstate Fair after almost 10 years of employment was unreasonable.

Some just want to play hard ball and force you to push the case to the Court house steps, if not a trial, in order to get fair personal injury compensation for my injured client.

I write this now so as to give the media defendants fair warning that the Order of Lederman J. remains binding on them and is to be obeyed in letter and in spirit...» Sentencing will be scheduled at a case conference to be held after Superior Court Justice Myers» reasons are released.

The Canadian Forum on Civil Justice is a non-profit, independent organization dedicated to bringing together the public, the courts, the legal profession and government in order to promote a civil justice system that is accessible, effective, fair and efficient.

It is important to get advice on the factors that the court must apply and balance in order to achieve a fair outcome.

The Court must consider the agreement to be relatively fair in order to enforce it.

We discuss major court opinions, new legislation and administrative orders and rulings that in - house counsel, human resource professionals and business owners need to know and understand in order to maintain a fair, productive and efficient workplace.

These provisions strive to strike a fair balance between: 1) the spouse who has legal title; 2) the spouse who doesn't have title, but has court - ordered possession; and 3) the lender who is poised to exercise its rights triggered by the default on the mortgage.

If a parent violates a court order regarding custody or parenting time, a New Jersey court can order almost any remedy that is fair and appropriate, including holding the parent in contempt.

Recently we wrote about the concept of «material change» in Separation Agreement Rolled into a Court Order — «Material Change of Circumstances» Still Required which involves the notion that a court - imposed order requiring a parent or spouse to pay support may have been fair at the time it was handed down, but subsequently becomes unfair due to unforeseen circumstaCourt Order — «Material Change of Circumstances» Still Required which involves the notion that a court - imposed order requiring a parent or spouse to pay support may have been fair at the time it was handed down, but subsequently becomes unfair due to unforeseen circumstaOrder — «Material Change of Circumstances» Still Required which involves the notion that a court - imposed order requiring a parent or spouse to pay support may have been fair at the time it was handed down, but subsequently becomes unfair due to unforeseen circumstacourt - imposed order requiring a parent or spouse to pay support may have been fair at the time it was handed down, but subsequently becomes unfair due to unforeseen circumstaorder requiring a parent or spouse to pay support may have been fair at the time it was handed down, but subsequently becomes unfair due to unforeseen circumstances.

You don't necessarily have to take your case to court in order to receive a fair settlement, but you will need leverage.

If a minority shareholder can demonstrate oppressive conduct, the shareholder can sue for a court - ordered buy - out at «fair value» and for the recovery of attorney's fees and court costs.

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois found the sign was fair use and not likely to infringe LEYE's LETTUCE trademark, so it denied LEYE's motion for a temporary restraining order.

Courts take a contextual approach and weigh each factor in order to come up with a fair result.

Some of my cases going to a judgment in the last few years were: Click to open judgment in fresh window (Scottish Courts site) Insurance implications of playing «Happy Birthday» on the piano Damages for psychiatric illness caused by bereavement Judicial approval of the Hohfeldian analysis of rights Leading case on fair rent assessment Title raiders and retrospective rectification Leading case on competency of hearsay evidence Detention ordered by children's hearing: Articles 5 and 6 of ECHR No damage suffered by making a smaller profit than expected «In a well - regulated legal universe black holes should not exist» How much is half a home worth, with or without a mortgage «Reasonably obtained» held not to include unethically obtained Leading case on children's hearing system and ECHR Attempt to judicially review SNP; petitioners held not to exist Unlawful for council to charge for property enquiries Fair sharing (100 % to nil) of matrimonial propfair rent assessment Title raiders and retrospective rectification Leading case on competency of hearsay evidence Detention ordered by children's hearing: Articles 5 and 6 of ECHR No damage suffered by making a smaller profit than expected «In a well - regulated legal universe black holes should not exist» How much is half a home worth, with or without a mortgage «Reasonably obtained» held not to include unethically obtained Leading case on children's hearing system and ECHR Attempt to judicially review SNP; petitioners held not to exist Unlawful for council to charge for property enquiries Fair sharing (100 % to nil) of matrimonial propFair sharing (100 % to nil) of matrimonial property

They made it clear that a court could make an ancillary relief order under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that departed from a «pre-nup» where it would not be fair to hold the parties to the agreement.

Rule 34 (1) of the General Medical Council (Fitness to Practise) Rules Order of Council 2004 (SI 2004/2608) provides that: «(1) Subject to paragraph (2), the Committee or a Panel may admit any evidence they consider fair and relevant to the case before them, whether or not such evidence would be admissible in a court of law.

The court also ordered «specific performance» of the plea bargain, even though Cooper was later convicted at a fair trial.

In holding that fair dealing is not simply a technical defence to infringement, but is more propery understood as an integral part of the act, the court characterized fair dealing as a user's right which, in order to maintain the proper balance between the rights of a copyright owner and users» interests, must not be interpreted restrictively.

[vi] See British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. British Columbia Government Service Employees» Union, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 3 («Meiorin») at para 3, where the Supreme Court allowed an appeal and restored the arbitrator's decision to reinstate an employee, Nilsson v. University of Prince Edward Island, [2013] P.E.I.H.R.B.I.D. No. 2 where the Board of Inquiry ordered a professor reinstated following a finding of age discrimination, Matheson v. Presbytery of Prince Edward Island and Others, [2007] P.E.I.H.R.B.I.D. No. 1 where the Board of Inquiry ordered reinstatement eleven years after the breach of the Human Rights Act had occurred, and, Fair v. Hamilton - Wentworth District School Board, 2013 HRTO 440 where the Tribunal ordered the applicant reinstated to an alternative position almost nine years following her termination.