Sentences with phrase «fair share of the equity»

Mr. Dougall was ordered by the court to obtain appraisals of two parcels of property owned by the parties and, further, to pay Mrs. Dougall a fair share of the equity in the parcels.

Not exact matches

In addition to the non-employee director compensation policy, in connection with this offering, we adopted a director stock ownership policy encouraging non-employee directors to hold shares of our Class A common stock with a value equal to at least one times the fair value of the director's annual equity award.

Given the absence of a public trading market of our common stock, and in accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Accounting and Valuation Guide, Valuation of Privately - Held Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation, our board of directors exercised reasonable judgment and considered numerous and subjective factors to determine the best estimate of fair value of our common stock, including independent third - party valuations of our common stock; the prices at which we sold shares of our convertible preferred stock to outside investors in arms - length transactions; the rights, preferences, and privileges of our convertible preferred stock relative to those of our common stock; our operating results, financial position, and capital resources; current business conditions and projections; the lack of marketability of our common stock; the hiring of key personnel and the experience of our management; the introduction of new products; our stage of development and material risks related to our business; the fact that the option grants involve illiquid securities in a private company; the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an initial public offering or a sale of our company given the prevailing market conditions and the nature and history of our business; industry trends and competitive environment; trends in consumer spending, including consumer confidence; and overall economic indicators, including gross domestic product, employment, inflation and interest rates, and the general economic outlook.

In addition to the non-employee director compensation policy, we intend to adopt a director stock ownership policy encouraging non-employee directors to hold shares of our Class A common stock with a value equal to at least one times the fair value of the director's annual equity award.

European equities have garnered a fair share of attention lately as leading indicators suggest economies in the region are starting to recover from years of crisis and austerity - induced recessions.

While the Campaign for Fiscal Equity lawsuit was supposed to give the city its fair share of education aid, Walcott said city revenue would cover 61 percent of non-federal education spending in next year's budget.

Walcott testified that the mayor was «outraged» that the state did not come through with the city's fair share of aid for next year and froze additional funds that were supposed to come to New York City schools as a result of the settlement of the Campaign for Fiscal Equity school aid lawsuit.

But together, we've laid the groundwork to advance charter school funding equity and mill sharing to combat these disparities, so that every public school student in Colorado will finally get their fair share of resources in the classroom.

On the face of this, valuation's binary: Either the EUR 0.25 per share Potential Offer is realized, or the Offer fails and Fair Value equates to the current estimated Equity (after over EUR 50 mio of losses and writedowns in 2011!)

Even a properly constructed portfolio with a well - diversified mix of equities will see its fair share of ups and downs during your investing lifetime.

Leaving them with a stub equity cost of maybe only 3 cents per share in Old NTR... vs. a potential $ 0.685 + Fair Value per share, assuming (for example) the lower end (i.e. $ 3.04 per share) of my recent Fair Value range.

Prior to the introduction of the 2010 Federal Budget (Mar 4 2010) when you took possession of ESPP stock (exercise date) and the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the shares, on that date, exceeds the Adjusted Cost Base (ACB) of those shares you were deemed to have received a taxable benefit equal to the exercise date equity FMV minus the ACB.

The report — Norway's fair share of an ambitious climate effort — is the firs major report that we have done since we updated and generalized the Greenhouse Development Rights system, and re-released our calculator as the Climate Equity Reference Calculator.

The Climate Equity Reference Calculator is a general online equity reference tool and database that systematically applies a generalized and transparent equity reference framework with the goal of quantitatively examining the problem of national fair shares in a global effort to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emisEquity Reference Calculator is a general online equity reference tool and database that systematically applies a generalized and transparent equity reference framework with the goal of quantitatively examining the problem of national fair shares in a global effort to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emisequity reference tool and database that systematically applies a generalized and transparent equity reference framework with the goal of quantitatively examining the problem of national fair shares in a global effort to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emisequity reference framework with the goal of quantitatively examining the problem of national fair shares in a global effort to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

For instance the following illustration prepared by EcoEquity and the Stockholm Environment Institute shows that the US fair share of global emissions, making what the authors of the report claim are moderate assumptions of what equity requires, demonstrates that equity not only requires the US to reduce its emissions to zero quickly almost immediately but that US obligations to prevent a 2 degree C rise requires the US to substantially fund ghg emissions reductions in other countries by 2025 despite achieving zero emissions by 2020.

Other organizations who have made calculations of the US fair share of the remaining carbon budget using different equity factors have concluded that the US fair share of safe global emissions is even smaller than that depicted in the above chart.

any nation's fair share of safe global emissions, matters which are referred to by the IPCC usually as burden - sharing or effort - sharing considerations and a matter taken up in chapter 4 of IPCC, Working Group III chapter on sustainability and equity,

We might add, however, even if nations did not agree to reduce their emissions based upon equity, basic and uncontroversial theories of justice would require nations to reduce their emissions to their fair share of safe global emissions.

Thus this process needs the inclusion of credible elements that possess the capacity to assess whether countries are doing their «fair «share, in line with science and a set of equity indicators.

Because, as we have demonstrated in the recent article on «equity» and climate change, there are approximately 50 ppm of CO2 equivalent atmospheric space that remain to be allocated among all nations to give the world approximately a 50 % chance of avoiding a 2oC warming and developing nations that have done little to elevate atmospheric CO2 to current levels need a significant portion of the remaining atmospheric space, high emitting developed nations need to reduce their emissions as fast as possible to levels that represent their fair share of the remaining acceptable global budget.

The CERP approach is designed to be general, to encompass a wide set of equity approaches, to express these approaches by way of straightforward and objective indicators, and to clearly present their implications with respect to national fair shares of a common global effort.

The Climate Equity Reference Calculator is a interactive online equity reference tool that systematically applies CERP's Effort - sharing Approach, with the goal of allowing users to quantitatively examine the problem of national fair shares in a global effort to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emisEquity Reference Calculator is a interactive online equity reference tool that systematically applies CERP's Effort - sharing Approach, with the goal of allowing users to quantitatively examine the problem of national fair shares in a global effort to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emisequity reference tool that systematically applies CERP's Effort - sharing Approach, with the goal of allowing users to quantitatively examine the problem of national fair shares in a global effort to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Leading civil society organizations have evaluated the emissions reductions promises of all the countries party to the Paris agreement, determining the extent to which they fall short of, or go beyond, the «fair shares» they should be providing to the world, using a thoughtful calculus of equity and science.

From the standpoint of some developing countries, even the «equity» scenario is inequitable, since it is based on calculated fair shares of the pie going forward.

A strong ethical case can be made that if nations have duties to limit their ghg emissions to their fair share of safe global emissions, a conclusion that follows both as a matter of ethics and justice and several international legal principles including, among others, the «no harm principle,» and promises nations made in the 1992 UNFCCC to adopt policies and measures required to prevent dangerous anthropocentric interference with the climate system in accordance with equity and common but differentiated responsibilities, nations have a duty to clearly explain how their national ghg emissions reductions commitments arguably satisfy their ethical obligations to limit their ghg emissions to the nation's fair share of safe global emissions.

The long term mitigation goal of the UNFCCC process, a zero emissions paradigm needed to stabilize the climate at any temperature level, will not be successful without differentiation, equity, implementation of fair shares, and clear principles of a just transition.

Although a strong case can be made that historical ghg emissions before 1990 should be considered in determining a nation's fair share of safe global emissions, selecting a common baseline year such as 1990 would facilitate easier citizen comparison of national commitments while retaining the rights of nations to make arguments that historical ghg emissions should be considered in any equity framework.

However, when you push a little farther and ask which countries are most at blame — which countries are doing their «fair share» and which are not — you find that only the reports of the Civil Society Equity Review coalition (full disclosure: I'm one of its authors) even attempts to broach the question.

Based on this, we quantified each country's range of fair shares of 1.5 °C - compliant mitigation, using the Climate Equity Reference Project's allocation framework.

Second, we elaborate our approach for quantifying countries» fair shares of a global mitigation effort, the Climate Equity Reference Framework.

«In this report, we systematically apply a generalized and transparent equity reference framework... with the goal of quantitatively examining the problem of national fair shares in a global effort to rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Even Oxfam has been in on the action releasing a Fair Shares equity review of national climate pledges.

It has done this primarily, but not exclusively, by way of its work on fair shares international effort sharing, via first the Greenhouse Development Rights project and, more recently, by way of its successor the Climate Equity Reference Project.

Upon a direct listing the fair value of the shares will be reclassified to equity.