This is probably the best and
fairest argument against LeBron that has been posted here.
Not exact matches
No, that's not an
argument against your claim, but turnabout is supposedly
fair play.
I think it
fair to say that at no point in these years have I received a single adequate reply to the
arguments I have made
against the Lib Dem policy.
The
argument is
against the prioritisation / lack of balance of the LibDem package which means we have a «
fair taxes» proposal increasing relative poverty and inequality at the bottom, while reducing it at the top.
Remark: In order to be
fair, the
arguments in support or
against (either some or more) fund the research in pure mathematics, are likewise requested (see this comment of Steven Landsburg).
Every citizen having a voice seems
fair, but one
argument against direct democracy as embodied by referendums is that they oversimplify complex
arguments.
That seems entirely
fair, but one
argument against them is that they oversimplify complex
arguments.
To be
fair, it is a difficult call to make for some, and there are many
arguments for and
against being a mistress.
The
arguments for and
against fracking are numerous: there is even a group of residents from Armstrong County in Pennsylvania where photography took place, that protest the film, accusing the film studios who aimed their cameras in their backyards that the movie would be
fair to the drillers.
The
argument against it is that when money's earned, tax is paid at the time, so to pay tax on it again isn't
fair.
One strong
argument against YouTube playthroughs qualifying as
fair use is the fact that, almost always, they are designed for profit.
By providing this
fair look at the evidence, it's interesting to see that gaming comes out in a very positive light, while the
arguments against them are almost entirely destroyed ir disproved.
Last week, a judge ruled
against Richard Prince's
argument of
fair use when he incorporated photographs from Patrick Cariou's book «Yes, Rasta» into his Canal Zone paintings:
It is absolutely a
fair argument to say that individuals who knowingly funded dishonest efforts to confuse the public about the climate change threat are participating in what might reasonably be defined as crimes
against humanity.
My first degree in is Physics, and I do from time to time comment directly on scientific issues, but nevertheless I think it is
fair to say that the main thrust of my posted
arguments against people like yourself and, indeed Nic Lewis, is more political than scientific.
This looks like more of his
fair and balanced posing — if someone offers
argument directed at one side, Danny rushes in to show how it is valid
against the other as well, thus confirming once again he is the non-partisan arbitrator we all secretly wish for.
This looks like more of his
fair and balanced posing — if someone offers
argument directed at one side, Danny rushes in to show how it is valid
against the other as well, -LSB-...]
«The most telling
arguments» supporting her conclusion
against fair use, she wrote, «came from an unlikely source — defendant's counsel himself.»