Sentences with phrase «fairly small effect»

The fairly small effect on overall completion conceals much larger effects on where NHRP - eligible students earn their degrees.

Dietary cholesterol has a fairly small effect on blood cholesterol level.

Not exact matches

Our view is that elections tend to have a brief positive impact on the market, although their long term effect tends to be fairly small.

Producer price inflation also moderated over the year, particularly at the earlier stages of production (Graph 70), even though the effect of movements in oil prices was fairly small over this period.

It might be worth mentioning that the chance of the vote failing seems fairly small at the moment, so the main effect of the ruling seems to be constitutional, not practical.

When the state's prison population was fairly small, the practice did not have much of an effect on legislative districts, but as the number of incarcerated people grew, so did the impact.

The halogens that are released generally end up in fairly unreactive forms where they have only a small effect on ozone.

Still, it's tough to fathom, with a much smaller cast budget and fairly unremarkable visual effects, just where those $ 200 million went.

And, even with small effects on the non-poor, shouldn't we have seen fairly dramatic improvements in overall educational and labor market outcomes?

Given these small sample sizes, it takes fairly large preschool effects for such effects to be detected as statistically significant.

People who owned multiple pets tended to be more strongly attached to their parrots than to other animals, although the effect size was fairly small.

This latest dl only sub game I feel has continued down the same small wrongs developed in locoroco 2 with even more distracting effects yet fairly spars graphically un-stimulating levels and the simple but brilliant game play has really gone wrong in this game.

Small - scale solar, which can essentially be done anywhere at mid and lower latitudes, has fairly limited effects on ecological habitats (though I'd like to see better resource extraction for silicon, copper, etc), concentrates resource needs to a local level, harnesses an «unlimited» resource, is a great compliment to other renewables, and once operational has no emission footprint.

The best case to argue for (fairly) direct negative effects on food supply may be for artisanal fisheries relying on small fish that make their homes in reefs.

The radiative changes will be fairly small no matter what, but the non-radiative effects will be most extreme where needed the most (tropics and mid-latitudes), and very mild where temperature differentials are smaller (toward the poles).

Given that, if one wants freedom of choice and an efficient market, shouldn't one accept a market solution (tax / credit or analogous system based on public costs, applied strategically to minimize paperwork (don't tax residential utility bills — apply upstream instead), applied approximately fairly to both be fair and encourage an efficient market response (don't ignore any significant category, put all sources of the same emission on equal footing; if cap / trade, allow some exchange between CO2 and CH4, etc, based CO2 (eq); include ocean acidification, etc.), allowing some approximation to that standard so as to not get very high costs in dealing with small details and also to address the biggest, most - well understood effects and sources first (put off dealing with the costs and benifits of sulphate aerosols, etc, until later if necessary — but get at high - latitude black carbon right away)?

So, you are not answering my question, whereas I am fairly certain, that my cited effects are real (they might be small, but that is for you to answer, since you seem to be sure of that) and there might be more.

If you ran the data on BOS PVD TAN and OWD you could probably tease out the effect of having a thermometer in a 24/7 blast furnace (BOS), a smaller furnace (PVD), a thermometer on the bottom of the Great Neponset Swamp with a touch of small jet traffic (OWD) and a well sited thermometer at a fairly rural prop job airport (TAN).

Changing a girl's name from something fairly feminine, like «Sue» (which is less masculine than the mean female voter's name), to a more gender - ambiguous name, like «Kelly,» increases her probability of becoming a judge by roughly 5 %.16 This effect may appear small, but it is highly nonlinear in nominal masculinity; changing a girl's name from «Sue» to a predominantly male name, like «Cameron» (75 % of those named «Cameron» in South Carolina's voting population are male), increases her probability of becoming a judge by a factor of 3 (roughly).