In these months it has been a disappointment that so few non-Catholic Christians seem to recognize that the attack is not just against the Catholic Church but against Christian
faith and morals as such.
Not exact matches
Universal to all
faith traditions is the call to safeguard our personal health
and the health of others
as a
moral obligation.
Not among those who use «religious
faith»
as a political weapon
and sanctimoniously refer to themselves
as the
moral ones
and the rest of us who do not agree with their ignorant
and distorted view of things
as immoral.
A polemicist might well have salty things to say about this abdication of
moral principles that Christians have held since the earliest days of the
faith, but in Wilcox's mild
and irenic diction the mainline churches are simply «accommodationist,» espousing what he calls a «Golden Rule Christianity» that honors tolerance, kindness,
and social justice
as paramount virtues.
Most I know are humanists; people who care about the rest of humanity regardless of their
faith and who adhere to a
moral code just
as noble
as anyone, just without a deity
as the center of their life.
In nearly every nation whose cultural heritage,
moral and legal systems developed from this western, Christian tradition, he is free to insult people of
faith as much
as he wishes.
@RUReal, «In nearly every nation whose cultural heritage,
moral and legal systems developed from this western, Christian tradition, he is free to insult people of
faith as much
as he wishes.»
I know that your personal
faith acts
as ones own personal
moral and spiritual compass, however the president should through out his personal beliefs in exchange for the betterment of all americans citizens not the 2 % of the wealthy class or the corporations, but all americans
The Church speaks with Christ's own authority on
faith and morals and evils such
as abortion, casual sex, the culture (or «anti-culture») of recreational drugs, binge - drinking,
and pornography.
Each denomination was fully independent but agreed to surrender certain prerogatives with regard to general problems such
as defense of the
faith, spread of the gospel,
and moral reform.
Neo-fundamentalists believe they alone are remaining true to the fullness of the gospel
and orthodox
faith while the rest of the evangelical church is in grave, near - apocalyptic danger of theological drift,
moral laxity,
and compromise with a postmodern culture — a culture which they see
as being characterized by a skepticism towards Enlightenment conceptions of «absolute truth,» a pluralistic blending of diverse beliefs, values,
and cultures,
and a suspicion of hierarchies
and traditional sources of authority.
Underlying this erroneous tendency,
as Faith has pointed out many times over the last forty years, is the implicit or explicit denial of the transcendence of God, the Divinity of Christ, the historical objectivity of revelation and the authority of the Church in matters of faith and morals, and also the denial of the spiritual soul as a principle of existence that is distinct from yet integrates the material within the unity of our human na
Faith has pointed out many times over the last forty years, is the implicit or explicit denial of the transcendence of God, the Divinity of Christ, the historical objectivity of revelation
and the authority of the Church in matters of
faith and morals, and also the denial of the spiritual soul as a principle of existence that is distinct from yet integrates the material within the unity of our human na
faith and morals,
and also the denial of the spiritual soul
as a principle of existence that is distinct from yet integrates the material within the unity of our human nature.
The real test of love
as seen in the deeper
moral traditions of mankind,
and in the Christian
faith, is the willingness of persons to commit their lives
and sexual being faithfully to one another «till death do us part».29
Those with any
moral clarity at all have heard a better voice in this campaign: no religious test shall ever be required
as a qualification, but the test of values
and integrity,
and a president who respects family
and rights of
faith is better than one who, like you, claims a religious label but then opposes family
and faith.
As Ford and Grisez have shown, and subsequent Magisterial teaching has expressed, the charism of infallibility extends to faith and morals — to specific moral norms, not just to matters directly revealed, but also to those matters closely connected (such as the Natural Law) to the Deposit of Faith and needed to safeguard that deposi
As Ford
and Grisez have shown,
and subsequent Magisterial teaching has expressed, the charism of infallibility extends to
faith and morals — to specific moral norms, not just to matters directly revealed, but also to those matters closely connected (such as the Natural Law) to the Deposit of Faith and needed to safeguard that dep
faith and morals — to specific
moral norms, not just to matters directly revealed, but also to those matters closely connected (such
as the Natural Law) to the Deposit of Faith and needed to safeguard that deposi
as the Natural Law) to the Deposit of
Faith and needed to safeguard that dep
Faith and needed to safeguard that deposit.
Bibliolatry became a problem when, confusing traditionalism with Tradition, the Protestant Reformers claimed the Bible
as the ONLY binding authority for
faith and morals:
Along with pastoring The Way Christian Center in the Bay Area, I serve
as the director of the LIVE FREE Campaign, a
faith - based movement committed to organizing the
moral voice
and actions of the
faith community to end gun violence
and mass incarceration.
We seek true ecumenism,
and its foundation is full
faith, deep charity
and tremendous personal, spiritual effort to live the integrity of Christ in
morals,
as well
as in
faith.
For life within the Catholic Church, the stumbling - block
as regards change in the Church's doctrine is not so much the question of defined dogmas
as other doctrines of the Church in dogmatic
and moral theology which are taught authoritatively but which in principle can not count
as defined doctrines of
faith or
as irreformable dogma.
The questions addressed the
moral role of TV celebrity chefs in the food waste debate
as well
as body image, food poverty
and the role of the Christian
faith in the overall debate.
While this change may be viewed
as moral progress, it is probably due, in part, to the evaporation of the sense of sin, guilt,
and retributive justice, all of which are essential to biblical religion
and Catholic
faith.
The changes in social structures of
moral action, which previously were strongly linked to
and supportive of Christian
faith, has important implications both to how we conceive our relationship
as Christians to our host society,
and how we nurture ethical behaviour within adherents of the Christian
faith who also participate fully
as members of this society.
He was a relentless advocate for the proposition that truth can be known
and binding, that
faith and reason are compatible, that the Magisterium is arbiter of Catholic
moral and dogmatic truths,
and that Magisterial teaching should be taught in a Catholic university
as integral to its mission.
«One of God's great delights in beholding his universe is,
as we may well suppose, to witness the unknown choices
and moral developments of free agents, to witness their displays of
faith and heroism
and spiritual valor,
and to watch the unfoldings of vast
and various enterprises» (FG 245).
McCormick discusses areas in which his thoughts have shifted: The nature of the church; the church
as the people of God; the church
as servant; the church
as collegial; the church
as ecumenical; the ecclesiological nature of the church; importance of lay witness; the teaching competence of the episcopal
and papal branch; the church
and moral truth; the place of dissent; birth regulation; ecclesial honesty; the dynamic nature of
faith.
With more
and more attention necessarily riveted on matters of morality
and ethics, it is hardly a surprise that we ask about
moral content
as a measure of the meaning of any God - talk,
and test the potency of
faith claims by the difference they make for human well - being
and the well - being of the wider creation.
This, of course, was an account of
moral character which saw it
as a substitute for Christian
faith and community, rather than its outcome.
Some how it's felt that values,
morals, virtues are not there in a secular world only faceless solid lifeless laws of men rather than what has been relayed by Holy books that calls for good deeds
and reject bad deeds
and to build a faithful societies, communities, nations since communications among nations or even among the nations of mixed cultures
and beliefs... Laws or God
and universe are to be prepared by some thing that is equivalent to UN but built on nations beliefs to achieve the code of understanding among nations but
as can see now it is build on groundless bases if not of words of God to
faiths... in addition to those non spiritual secular beliefs to make decisions of
faith but at the moment the secular world make
and take the decisions while the beliefs
and faiths has to pay for it when it becomes a war between all
faiths or religions outside your world, it would become back into your inside among the mixed culture
and beliefs of the nation or nations under one country flag...!
Today's world man has become with no value other than his organs if sold or stolen... so what is happening only proves that we are imposing marketing the wrongs against the rights... cultures
and beliefs are going down the drain with all those values,
morals, virtues some how turning into commotion among cultures
and beliefs turning against each other misunderstanding each other or unaware of cultures way of living
and beliefs to ease communication mutual understanding
as a nation of mankind
and a nation of
faiths.
It begins where women in theology attempt to deconstruct basic ethical principles such
as «the common good»
and «the question of
moral power
and authority,» but from there it moves to the creative impulses we see around us,
as women in
faith and faithfulness reconstruct the future image
and face of the Church
as a «community of Christ, bought with a price, where everyone is welcome, «14
as Letty Russell describes it.
Furthermore, the degree of certainty of such historical aetiology can be increased by the fact that the rational inference is drawn under the light of
faith and of inspiration,
as of course happens in recognition of more precise precepts of the natural
moral law.
For this reason, among others, the
faith is presented
as adherence to a set of formulations of doctrine rather than a following of the
moral teaching of Jesus that God is love
and calls us to love one another.
Feuerbach was convinced that religious belief corrupts morality
as well
as truthfulness,
and he could even say: «It lies in the nature of
faith that it is indifferent to
moral duties.»
Religion
as the means of well - being for a community
and thus for each individual, who has a role in that community, requires a common understanding between like - minded involving
faith in a creed, obedience to a
moral code set down in sacred Scriptures or participation in a cult.
Perhaps,
as we work
and pray for such a
faith - guided cultural resurrection, we might show Fantasia
and Sleeping Beauty to our children
and shield them from the barren
and looted
moral landscape of Tangled.
Where the Council was not teaching on matters of
faith and morals, such
as where it was describing contemporary conditions or offering recommendations for renewal, its statements are to be received with respect
and gratitude but are not necessarily flawless in either their factual accuracy or their prudential judgment.
This appalling ignorance of the Church's teaching in
Faith and Morals is surely the root cause of the decline of Catholicism in this country today,
and,
as many people observe, goes back at least one generation, (presumably that of its authors).
Others of his shorter works, which are also published
as Faith Pamphlets,
and many
as yet unpublished gems from his ordinary parish newsletters, reveal the effectiveness of this living vision of Christian truth - simultaneously doctrinal,
moral, spiritual
and practical.
As far as matters of faith and morals are concerned, both booklets are aimed primarily at nudging vaguely practising parents in an orthodox directio
As far
as matters of faith and morals are concerned, both booklets are aimed primarily at nudging vaguely practising parents in an orthodox directio
as matters of
faith and morals are concerned, both booklets are aimed primarily at nudging vaguely practising parents in an orthodox direction.
In a long series of captivating thumbnail biographical sketches, he documents both the force of the modern mind's attack on religion
and the grief that accompanied it
as people lamented losing the aesthetic
and moral dimensions of
faith.
The same St. Paul who admonishes us to grow into the stature of Christ insists again
and again that we are «saved by
faith»
and not «by works»; which is to say that our final peace is not the
moral peace of having become what Christ defines
as our true nature but is the religious peace of knowing that a divine mercy accepts our loyalty to Christ despite our continued betrayal of him.
As American society
and law remain grounded in
moral norms
and faith - based traditions, those asserting claims grounded in religious freedom may strike sympathetic chords.
They simply believed that there responsibility
as parents was not only to foster
morals, ethics,
and good character in their children but also to instruct them in the
faith that they believed to be true.
They embrace not only the philosophies of the Judeo - Christian
faiths and the many religions of the East, but nonreligious, ethical
and moral thought
as well....
This renewal requires a commitment to fundamental values within a framework of belief - in this case Christian
faith - that is in dialogue with other frameworks.49 From a similar perspective, Robin Gill sees the primary function of the church in society
as that of generating «key values which alter the fundamental
moral, social,
and political vision.»
Jesus is indignant that the scribes
and Pharisees (1) will not enter the kingdom of heaven themselves
and stand in the way of others entering it
as well; (2) will do almost anything to win a proselyte only to make that proselyte twice
as much a child of hell
as they are; (3) confuse people by senseless oaths, telling them that if they swear by the Temple, their oath is not binding, but if they swear by the gold of the Temple, it is binding - the fools ought to realize, Jesus says, that the Temple includes all that is in it; (4) tithe some of their money but neglect justice
and mercy
and faith, which are weightier
moral matters, when they ought both to tithe
and perform these greater acts of righteousness
as well; (5) are careful about outward cleanliness but careless about the inward disposition, so that they are filled with extortion
and greed; (6) appear righteous but really are hypocrites, because their appearance hides all manner of iniquity inside; (7) pretend to revere the prophets of history whom their parents killed but continue to practice the evil of their parents by rejecting those whom God sends to them now (Matt.
While admittedly of human origins, it has come to be thought of
as authoritative also, in the expression of religious
faith,
and of very high value in the teaching of religion
and morals.
But his words were bound to be misunderstood in Rome,
as well
as distorting his teaching in a way that for generations has allowed Catholics anxious to challenge the magisterium on some point of
faith and morals to claim that they have Newman on their side.
The witness of the Church was clear in
faith and morals,
as might be expected from an institution divinely established
and promised perpetual duration.
The church possesses, or better is possessed by, the principle of life «in Christ» — a life of discipleship that is not simply obedience to a set of
moral truths supposedly taught by Jesus but a life in which «Christ dwells in our hearts by
faith»
and enables his people to act, insofar
as they are able, in conformity with his pattern of human existence.