In fact he qualified it significantly, acknowledging that the post-Easter consciousness of the early Church gave all the appearance of a confident
faith in immortality.
In the thinking of many people the greatest obstacle to
faith in immortality is the way in which they emphasize the dependence of the mind on the body.
So that
a faith in immortality, if we are to indulge it, demands of us nowadays a scale of representation so stupendous that our imagination faints before it, and our personal feelings refuse to rise up and face the task.
The New Testament, therefore, so far as
faith in immortality is concerned, does possess an «absolutely new atmosphere.»
When, for example, Jeremiah, thrown back on God amid the social disintegration of his time, entered into a trustful reliance on Yahweh — «my strength, and my stronghold, and my refuge in the day of affliction» (Jeremiah 16:19)-- he was unwittingly blazing a trail toward
faith in immortality.
This has always been the implicit logic of
faith in immortality when it has been most powerful and morally significant.
Indeed, the factors that made headway toward Hebrew
faith in immortality difficult were very powerful.
The persuasiveness of
faith in immortality will no doubt always seem greater to those who stand within the Christian heritage than to those who view it critically from without.
In the nature of the case the evidence needed for reasoned proof on empirical grounds is not accessible, and we had better frankly admit that
our faith in immortality is a faith, coherent with what we know of God and his ways with men, and not a conclusion from scientific evidence.
They had inculcated a deep sense of sin and a conscious need of personal salvation; they had overpassed national and racial lines and had made religious faith a matter of individual conviction; they had emphasized
faith in immortality and the need of assurance concerning it; they had bound their devotees together in mystical societies of brethren fired with propagandist zeal; and they had accentuated the interior nature of religious experience in terms of an, indwelling Presence, through whom human life could be «deicized.»
Nevertheless, the Christian
faith in immortality has an important connection with the idea of man's dignity and worth, for according to the Christian outlook every human soul has a value great enough to be appropriately thought imperishable.
In this regard the indirect results of the rising
faith in immortality seem at times as important as the substance of the faith itself.
Not exact matches
One of the major factors
in concentrating attention on the individual has always been
faith in some form of
immortality.
Yet the Bible explicitly says that only God has
immortality inherently and that
immortality is brought to light through the gospel and granted to the glorified saints who persevered
in the
faith to the end, whereas it does not appear to say anywhere that
immortality is granted to the unsaved.
Reinhold Niebuhr wrote
in 1939, «The idea of the resurrection of the body is a Biblical symbol
in which modern minds find the greatest offence and which has long since been displaced
in most modern versions of the Christian
faith by the idea of the
immortality of the soul.61
Insofar as resurrection is understood
in terms of
immortality, it is perhaps an optional belief for the Christian
faith.
Here is Carl Van Doren
in «Why I Am an Unbeliever» announcing his unbelief: «I do not believe
in any god that has ever been devised,
in any doctrine that has ever been revealed,
in any scheme of
immortality that has ever been expounded»» those passive verbs setting up
faith as a fraud from the start.
The adaptation of Christianity to the an - thropocentric
faith appeared
in other ways:
in the attenuation of the conviction of sin and of the necessity of rebirth,
in the substitution of the human claim to
immortality for the Christian hope and fear of an after - life,
in the glorification of religious heroes, and
in the efforts of religious men and societies to become saviors.
In terms of faith, apart from his love of the Mass, the time at the Oratory also gave him a strong grounding in Thomist metaphysics, and certainly this was a key element in the way he portrayed evil, death, immortality and many other things in his storie
In terms of
faith, apart from his love of the Mass, the time at the Oratory also gave him a strong grounding
in Thomist metaphysics, and certainly this was a key element in the way he portrayed evil, death, immortality and many other things in his storie
in Thomist metaphysics, and certainly this was a key element
in the way he portrayed evil, death, immortality and many other things in his storie
in the way he portrayed evil, death,
immortality and many other things
in his storie
in his stories.
obscures the witness of Christian
faith to the essential difference between God and man — the Creator and the creature, the Redeemer and the redeemed... It is the very refusal to live, finally, solely from God's love for us that I find involved
in the setting up of our own subjective
immortality alongside of our objective
immortality in God.
If one accepts the view of Christian
faith, he can believe
in personal
immortality.
However this may be, it is apparent that there is not now, there never has been, and there never will be, any strictly logical demonstration of what the Christian is talking about when he speaks not so much of
immortality as of «eternal life» and above all when he declares his
faith in «resurrection».
These glosses called into question the creation of the world
in time, the role of the senses and the imagination
in human knowing, the individuality (and personal responsibility) of the human intellect and will, the
immortality of the human composite of body and soul, the role of divine Providence, the simple standard of one truth governing both theology and philosophy, and other foundations of both Catholic
faith and empirical (as distinct from gnostic) reason.