Since their commitments are not in fact based
on faith seeking understanding, the understanding that emerges from faith is of little interest to them.
Theology
as faith seeking understanding or intentionally Christian reflection on important questions is largely relegated to the professors of systematic theology.
Thus the initiative of Eliot, Kirkland, and the other Protestant educational reformers to free their institutions from church control continues to play itself out, and the alienation from particular churches seems to entail the delayed but inexorable estrangement from
communal faith seeking understanding.
In this regard I recognize the authenticity of Akyol's quest, as well as its similarity with that of Christians who take seriously the task
of faith seeking understanding.
Jake: Anselm's dictum, «
Faith seeks understanding» makes sense to me.
St. Anselm defined theology as «
faith seeking understanding.»
In the option he favors —
faith seeking understanding — what he means by «faith» is really belief.
In the book's final pages Martin delineates what he regards as the only three possible solutions: «Only Faith,» in which the believer is dismissive of the expert opinions of the historians; «Only Reason,» in which the believer is «totally submissive to the historians»; and «
Faith Seeking Understanding,» in which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and faith.
Martin delineates what he regards as the only three possible solutions: «Only Faith,» «Only Reason,» and «
Faith Seeking Understanding,» in which some sort of compromise is worked out between the historian and faith.
If «theology» means «
faith seeking understanding,» and «faith» is not being used subjectively, then there is no theology outside Christianity.
It reverses St. Anselm's dictum «
faith seeking understanding,» so that understanding seeks whatever faith it likes, or no faith at all.
Augustine, Anselm and Pascal led me to
a faith seeking understanding.
Anselm of Canterbury coined the phrase Fides Quaerens Intellectum (
Faith Seeking Understanding) when engaging in theological investigations.
Faith seeks understanding — and sometimes finds it.
The most common definition of theology is «
faith seeking understanding.»
According to the old Latin expression, theology is fides quaerens intellectum (
faith seeking understanding).
What do you think about Anselm's conclusion: «
Faith seeks understanding»... that is, knowledge doesn't lead to faith, but faith seeks to understand, which leads to knowledge?
It is still theology in the traditional sense of «
faith seeking understanding.»
A student astonished me by responding, «
Faith seeking understanding.»
I believe that Barth, while making a convincing case against an appeal to reason prior to faith, lurched to an extreme position that failed to do justice to the apologetic aspects of theology as «
faith seeking understanding.»
Perhaps it is the natural intermeshing of religious imagination and the structures of reason that prompted Anselm's famous Fides quaerans intellectum, «
Faith seeking understanding.»
Theirs is
faith seeking understanding.
The work of
faith seeking understanding, especially if we think of this as the kind of faith that operates in the mainstream of the oldline churches, is at the periphery of seminary teaching.
This criticism can come about in the context of
faith seeking understanding, and in this case it characteristically moves on to repentance and theological change.
That is an ideal one does not necessarily need revelation to desire and pursue, but one does need revelation if one wishes to be faithful to theology's ideal of «
faith seeking understanding.»
Anselm had a «
faith seeking understanding.»
Faith Seeking Understanding
Despite my philosophical and theological criticisms of his method, I came to appreciate something Anselmian in Lindbeck: fides quarens intellectum,
faith seeking understanding.
The orthodoxy built on the Gospel of John calls us to believe the basic story about Jesus and his significance to the early church; the Gnostics invite us to a second conversion,
a faith seeking understanding that transforms the self.
The revised canon fails to understand the true nature of the Catholic college or university because it assumes an enduring conflict between faith and truth or, at least, assumes that
faith seeking understanding will always operate in obedience to the institutional understanding of faith.
Faith seeks understanding.
This question is not easy to answer, and it must arise ever again in any attempt to explain the approach through «
faith seeking understanding.»
Ironically, the court adopted a secular stereotype of religion, in which religion is associated exclusively with leaps of faith rather than with Anselm's «
faith seeking understanding.»
Faith seeking understanding!
This, I believe, is an accurate representation of what Anselm intended by his meditation on the grounds of
faith seeking understanding, and Hartshorne's account clearly expresses the situation of the believer in relation to the two opponents.