To me, there is no better indication of the «goodness» of a person's
faith than the way in which they interact with others.
Not exact matches
-- Outside of this
faith - based position, Larry is not immune to data, knows his
way around budget tables, and more
than most, thinks about the interaction between financial markets and the real economy.
This is why any willingness to accept risk will far more tied to our longstanding measures of market action and other testable factors
than to some novel «Bernanke
faith factor» that we have no
way of testing historically in any kind of rigorous manner.
Bob... not very long from now if things keep going the
way they are, you will have a lot more to worry about
than anyone of any
faith....
Religion and
faith are a personal choice and journey as is the lack of either; I raised my son and daughter much in the same
ways I was raised and I am proud of their understanding and acceptance of Judaism, Christianity and Islam, that they do not look down on or speak ill of others who believe differently
than they.
One of the
ways in which having
faith affects us is that we (hopefully) become more values - led, our awareness opened to wider issues, rather
than just living in a personal bubble.
Second there are plenty of people who come to their
faith as it were through something more
than bible verses its called critical thinking people can critically think their
way to the idea that they are rather small beings in a relatively huge universe and that they realize that they can't know everything and leave some things including the nature of the universe to
faith and acknowledge it as
faith if that's how they see the world fine is there anything particularly wrong with that?
Yes, I whole heartedly dissagree with even the existence of the Catholic Church (though they are good for a laugh), something my Catholic wife and I have frequent conversations about (interestingly enough, I know
WAY more about the tennets of her
faith than she does).
Though I personally prefer «
faith» bc my spiritual self has been fed by a Love greater
than my own... and indeed,
faith freed me from religion in a
way that spirituality hadn't.
If it changes your
faith... then either you are looking at it in a different
way than I do, or you place too much stock in who gets into heaven and who goes to hell.
The history of modernity in the West is in many
ways nothing more
than the effort to destroy medieval
faith.
Why, there's thousands of different «denominations» even within the major
faiths, and no
faith has any
way to prove that their reasoning is better
than that of any other
faith.
This has resulted in a
way of understanding Christian
faith that maximizes the «forensic» rather
than the actual impact of grace and tends to contrast
faith and reason,
faith and works, and so on.
Both of these are
way better methods of arriving at conclusions
than faith.
I don't know how to raise them in the
faith in any other
way than this: God is good, God is Love, God is for you, never against you, and when you want to dance, darling, wave your flag and spin, let the wind of the Spirit move through you.
Your pet evangelical gate - keeper isn't the sole arbitrator of the Christian
faith: there is more complexity and beauty and diversity of voices and experiences within followers of the
Way than you know.
It is written that God would rather have lost one of His sheep and found it again, then to never have lost Him at all, Meaning It is very easy in this world now more
than ever to lose sight of God and your
faith, we all sin even the most devote christian, But coming back to our
faith and our christian
ways after losing it is something that brings God joy..
It wasn't the summer that brought an end to my doubt, but it was the summer I encountered a different Jesus, a Jesus who requires more from me
than intellectual assent and emotional allegiance; a Jesus who associated with sinners and infuriated the religious; a Jesus who broke the rules and refused to cast the first stone; a Jesus who gravitated toward sick people and crazy people, homeless people and hopeless people; a Jesus who preferred story to exposition and metaphor to syllogism; a Jesus who answered questions with more questions, and demands for proof with demands for
faith... a Jesus who healed each person differently and saved each person differently; a Jesus who had no list of beliefs to check off, no doctrinal statements to sign, no surefire
way to tell who was «in» and who was «out»; a Jesus who loved after being betrayed, healed after being hurt, and forgave while being nailed to a tree; a Jesus who asked his disciples to do the same...
There is no other
way for your
faith to grow
than for your
faith to be tested.
Unless we learn to challenge our own beliefs the
way we challenge others», whatever they may be can be no more
than a blind
faith at best or a delusion at worst, be that for or against religion (especially the puerile version of Christianity).
Having absolute
faith is frowned upon and I think I've heard Jesus mentioned in a loving
way less
than 10 times in ten years.
For Christianity, although it is a religion in the sense that it links the life of man with the Life of God, is far more
than one of the world's great
faiths: it is the revelation of the
way of true living.
But whereas Justin was eventually able to reconcile his sexuality with his
faith and with Scripture in such a
way that has left open the possibility for a relationship with a man in his future, Wesley says that «my own story, by contrast, is a story of feeling spiritually hindered rather
than helped by my homosexuality.
It is a
way never formally considered by the Christian
faith, and its ultimate acceptance or rejection will be determined only by whether it can persuade Christians that it is a more suitable explanation of what they believe about God
than the traditional explanations.
I think I just may have more
faith in «God» and «Jesus»
than you do, from the
way you are posting.
The fact that interest in God's idiosyncratic reality and peculiar
ways of being present are situated means, in short, that the conceptual growth they guide is always open to the suspicion of being in bad
faith, of being more of an interest in using God for our own purposes
than an interest in apprehending God for the sake of apprehending God.
We also become more likely to misinterpret an honest challenge to our
faith as an «attack,» and react in a
way that is less
than winsome.»
After a few years of wilderness wandering (you should expect that, by the
way — look for the manna; look for the water from rock), I found myself in the Episcopal Church, which is no less riddled with conflict and shortcomings
than any other Christian tradition, but which introduced me to the sacraments that have managed to sustain my ever - complicated, ever - faltering
faith.
However, and quite surprisingly I should add, you might be interested to know the effect your words have upon a believer in God of forty years, and by the
way I wish to thank you for your words in this province, that when I read such terse thoughts they have the distinct effect of deepening, in an extraordinary
way, my
faith and cause me to love and worship God even more
than ever.
«In a strange
way the present passage speaks more about God's
faith in Abraham
than Abraham's
faith in God.»
Throughout, Weinandy imaginatively engages the Christian tradition in a
way that respects the truths of
faith as a «mystery» to be explored rather
than as «problems» to be solved, thus giving to his entire work the character of intelligently believing humility.
He who seeks refuge in an infallible church or in an infallible Bible is less acquainted with the
way of
faith,
than the person who knows neither of these, but who nevertheless obeys the word of God in the midst of his own uncertainty.
The sacrament stimulates a value response to an object other
than itself — in this sense being a kind of instrumental value — by virtue of a three -
way congruence of some sort involving person, sacrament, an ultimate
faith - object.
From Karl: Who do you feel you have more in common with, religiously - Christians who take a progressive / liberal theological approach to their
faith similar to the
way you approach Judaism, or Jews (conservative or Orthodox) who take a significantly more literal / conservative approach to the Jewish
faith than you do?
The best
way to protect America is to warmly welcome law abiding citizens of any
faith, such a rare and wonderful thing about us, something we can hold up as unique and special, something that does nt provoke but binds loyalty.Being different, more accepting and loving
than the ugliness found in anti-Christian cultures, is our greatest strength.
Apple, and yet here you are, slightly damaged, slightly bitter, yet tougher
than before, like most of us, effected by life and people who abused our trust and crushed our
faith, we find our
way through and heal.
And that means you are someone who is easily swayed to believe something...
way more
than any other religious person who at least require a basis for their
faith.
In these instances, the images are more
than pictures; they are
ways of mediating to us a
faith or a set of values.
It may be increasingly necessary, however, to allow the concrete situation, rather
than the biblical revelation, to propose the «doctrinal» loci or the organizing forms in terms of which biblical
faith needs to speak, because the secularism of our time has so transformed the
way people think that Christian
faith is now in a cross-cultural situation.
There is nothing those of
faith and religion want more
than eternal bliss, and as we all know, the easiest
way to get their is to stay eternally ignorant...
There are a thousand
ways in which we try in today's language to affirm this
faith, but perhaps none is more forceful or rings truer
than the words of Maltbie D. Babcock's familiar hymn:
After setting forth what Missouri understands to be the Lutheran teaching of justification by «
faith alone,» the ad depicts Catholic teaching in this
way: «The Roman Catholic Church teaches that something more
than trust in Christ is necessary for us to be saved.
«C.S. Lewis when speaking about why prayers are not always answered the
way we want them to be said that in his experience it was often the new Christian's prayers that were answered rather
than those with a mature
faith.
Certainly there are more
than what is treated here, but I've compiled a few
ways Bonhoeffer continues to help us think through the
faith:
Obama's so - called Christian
faith is nothing more
than a box he checked off on his
way to public office.
This theoretical attitude, which comes so naturally to modern scientific humankind, is likely to be far more destructive to Christianity
than any attack that the atheists might launch, because it can cut the very heart out of the Christian life — and in such a
way that the individual does not at all think of himself or herself as having given up the
faith.
Today's world man has become with no value other
than his organs if sold or stolen... so what is happening only proves that we are imposing marketing the wrongs against the rights... cultures and beliefs are going down the drain with all those values, morals, virtues some how turning into commotion among cultures and beliefs turning against each other misunderstanding each other or unaware of cultures
way of living and beliefs to ease communication mutual understanding as a nation of mankind and a nation of
faiths.
In other words, the choice which Life requires of our considered action is a great deal less complex
than at first seemed to be the case; for it is reduced to a simple choice between the first and last stages of the successive alternatives which we have been able to define: the rejection of Being, which returns us to dust, or the acceptance of Being, which leads us, by
way of socialization, to
faith in a Supreme Unity — opposite directions along a single road.
Kierkegaard showed that
faith is a far more profound reality
than looking at Christ's
way aesthetically, or even morally.
it is for freedom of thought and conscience for all people... those of
faith and non-
faith, or of God or godless people... The Commission would stand up for all people... so that one person does not kill another person because they think some other
way than you think or I think.