I could understand if you have a problem with combining smoothed proxy
data with an instrumental record, but calling it fraudulent because it «hides the
decline», suggesting that the instrumental record is
fake, is beyond my capabilities of understanding skeptics.
Grey literature, sloganeering,
fake experts, hiding the
decline, cherry - picking
data, insider clubs all show up in the anti-agriculture Green color revolution - types at CARB and the psuedo - agriculture schools like Cornell.