Tame
fake science journals packed with denialist allies.
Not exact matches
@mpmyer5 The «statistics say it can not happen» argument is
fake, and its advocates never publish their calculations in
science journals because they would be proven wrong.
Filippo Menczer, a professor in the IU School of Informatics, Computing and Engineering, is a co-author of a paper published March 8 in the
journal Science that calls for a coordinated investigation into the underlying social, psychological and technological forces behind
fake news.
But after learning that work by South Korean scientist Woo Suk Hwang had been
faked, the
journal Science retracted Hwang's landmark papers from 2004 and 2005, which reported the first human embryonic stem cells from cloned embryos.
Journals, including
Science, say they assume that
faked affiliations would be detected by co-authors during the writing or editing process.
► «[F] raudsters are snatching entire Web addresses, known as Internet domains, right out from under academic publishers, erecting
fake versions of their sites, and hijacking their
journals, along with their Web traffic,» John Bohannon wrote, also in this week's
Science.
An investigation by
Science Contributing Correspondent John Bohannon identified 24 recently snatched
journal domains, two of which now host
fake journals created by hijackers:
The need for «sweating the details in climate discourse» came up here in 2010, after the
journal Science picked a
faked image of a polar bear on an ice floe to accompany a letter on the seriousness of global warming from 255 members of the National Academy of Sciences.
Are you saying that Nature,
Science Magazine, Oceanography, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, etc. are not actually science journals or publish «fake science?
Science Magazine, Oceanography, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, etc. are not actually
science journals or publish «fake science?
science journals or publish «
fake science?
science?»
In the media recently was a revealling story on «dubious» practices in research, describing how the well - known
science publisher Elsevier had published a series of «
fake»
journals that were dedicated entirely to publishing results from drug company research (such as the «Australasian
Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine `, dedicated to