Sentences with phrase «fake science which»

But this stuff is not really interesting because it is comprised of fake experts doing fake science which leads them to fake outrage.

Not exact matches

But after learning that work by South Korean scientist Woo Suk Hwang had been faked, the journal Science retracted Hwang's landmark papers from 2004 and 2005, which reported the first human embryonic stem cells from cloned embryos.

Events for the younger set included a tour of «the fourth dimension» — a room full of hypercubes and other higher dimensional objects that gave me a touch of vertigo; a chamber of robots that you could teach to play football; a demonstration of forensic science involving (real) guns and a (fake) cadaver in a staged crime scene; a live cooking show in which physicists, chemists, and anthropologists explained the science and origins of food; and a walking tour through the natural history of excrement featuring — you guessed it — a dizzying array of animal feces.

An investigation by Science Contributing Correspondent John Bohannon identified 24 recently snatched journal domains, two of which now host fake journals created by hijackers:

Later that year, an investigation by Science uncovered an underground market for fake academic credentials, in which some peddlers may have used SCIgen to save themselves the effort of writing «authentic» fake papers by hand.

«Every elementary teacher, history teacher, science teacher, and English teacher should engage learners in activities in which they distinguish between real and fake news, reputable social media posts and disreputable ones, credible author credentials and false ones, hard news or op - eds,» writes Todd Finley (@finleyt) in Greenville, North Carolina.

Suddenly, we seem to live in a time dominated by «fake news», «alternative facts», conspiracy theories, scepticism of scientific research, partial accounts parading as «the real truth which has hitherto been concealed from us, the people», revolts against allegedly smug academic elites and distant political elites — a time where YouTube videos claiming research into climate change to be a scam get far more viewers than videos presenting the science of climate change.

Unfortunately, the fossil fuel industry has tremendous assets available to them which they use to purchase political power, as well as sponsor fake science and bogus «public education» campaigns.

Climate campaigners seem to think they have a winner with this takedown of elected officials who reject global warming science, in which fake news reports talk of the turmoil and tragedy created by Hurricane Marco Rubio, Hurricane James Inhofe, Hurricane John Boehner and more.

I believe that I have established an error in the methodology of the paper — NASA faked the moon Landings [therefore] climate science is a Hoax — Psychological Science, which impacts on a key claim of thescience is a Hoax — Psychological Science, which impacts on a key claim of theScience, which impacts on a key claim of the paper.

This is all laid out in gory detail by John Mashey's expose on fake science, fakexperts and funny finance which he released last week.

The only «science» field where this «visible light from the Sun heats matter» claim is taught is in «climate science», which was created by whoever created the fake fisics of AGW in the first place.

Hence, the title of the paper «NASA faked the moon landing — Therefore (Climate) Science is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science ``, which claimed to find a correlation between belief in the principle of a free - market, rejection of climate change science and «conspiracy ideation&Science is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science ``, which claimed to find a correlation between belief in the principle of a free - market, rejection of climate change science and «conspiracy ideation&Science ``, which claimed to find a correlation between belief in the principle of a free - market, rejection of climate change science and «conspiracy ideation&science and «conspiracy ideation».

The National Center for Science Education (NCSE), which is a real public charity - and not, as Heartland, a PR agency faking it - has long helped teachers defend science against creatScience Education (NCSE), which is a real public charity - and not, as Heartland, a PR agency faking it - has long helped teachers defend science against creatscience against creationism.

In a recent post on her Web site, No Frakking Consensus, she provides excerpts from scientists, ethicists, and activists who excuse or even lionize Peter Gleick for stealing Heartland Institute budget documents, impersonating a Heartland board member, misrepresenting himself to bloggers as an anonymous «Heartland insider,» and palming off as genuine — maybe also authoring — a fake climate strategy document in which Koch supposedly funds Heartland to keep opposing voices out of Forbes magazine, sell doubt as their product, and dissuade teachers from teaching science.

In their first study, the 1,116 participants looked at a fake newspaper page which, for most, included an ad by the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

The climate models create ~ 66 % more than real lower atmosphere warming by the fake «back radiation» idea, taught in US Atmospheric Science for ~ 50 years, coupled with the fake single -18 deg C OLR emitter idea, which provides an imaginary negative Down flux in the bowdlerised two - stream approximation (blame Sagan for this).

These expert claims were primarily based on simulations from climate models (and less so on the actual empirical evidence) which has become a sure fire methodology of producing bass - ackwards fake science.

Kurt Bardella, a former spokesman for Breitbart News (which with Cambridge Analytica has common links to conservative billionaire Richard Mercer), described the company's sales pitch as «fancy fake science.»