Right now, the only thing keeping me from falling (pun intended) into the cold - weather blues, is the fact that cooler
fall temperatures means that it is time to break out the fall flavors.
Not exact matches
We love to welcome
fall in Texas - yes, because it
means the
temperatures start to cool down, but also because there are so many fun
fall activities to do.
That could
mean a slightly earlier
fall color season, particularly if
temperatures dip below freezing.
But the researchers say that the coldest place of all might be nearby Dome Argus, where a higher elevation could
mean temperatures fall beyond -100 °C.
That would probably
mean they experienced a wet - dry cycle, because it is extremely unlikely that the
temperature fell below freezing.
According to the model, higher
temperatures will
mean that what
falls in winter will increasingly be rain, not snow, and that more of it will run off right away.
And even in wet years, warmer
temperatures could
mean that more precipitation
falls as rain, not snow, setting up the possibility that many more years will see an April 1 with very little snow.
Here over the past 30 years the
mean January
temperature has
fallen modestly and shows no signs at all of any warming.
That
mean global tropospheric
temperature has for the last 50 years
fallen and risen in close accord with the SOI of 5 — 7 months earlier shows the potential of natural forcing mechanisms to account for most of the
temperature variation.
Looking at the grafs, i notice that ocean heat content jumps about the time surface
temperatures fall below ensemble
mean.
On top of that,
temperatures have been extremely warm — the winter of 2014 - 2015 was the hottest on record for California — which
meant that what precipitation did
fall often did so as rain and not snow.
High
temperatures also
meant that any snow that did
fall melted very early in the season, leaving only a smattering come spring.
Falling temperatures and fewer daylight hours don't
mean that your outdoor running routine has to go into hibernation for the winter.
The
temperatures in Texas might not be quite cool enough to wear typical
fall things just yet, but that doesn't
mean you can't still look
fall appropriate.
However, the
temperature is starting to drop, especially early mornings and late afternoons, which
means you guys can expect to see more
fall transitional looks in the days to come.
But
fall, oh
fall, it
means cooler
temperatures, less bugs, beautiful trees... I'll take it.
Temperatures falling doen't
mean the end of fashion.
Fall means chili and layering and pretty colors and perfect
temperatures.
Now, I am by no
means begging for the cold to rush in, just some lovely
fall colors with comfortable
temperatures.
While
fall is officially here, the warm
temperatures mean I have to find ways to mix and match my summer staples with new
fall favorites.
But seriously, the cooler
temperatures are coming and with that
means cozy
fall decorations, all the things pumpkin spice and boots.
At the same time,
falling natural gas prices — combined with warm
temperatures in much of the country — will
mean big savings on heating bills.
Hypothermia — Dogs are subject to hypothermia just as humans are, and if your dog's
temperature falls below normal (100.5 to 102.5 degrees F) and stays there, it
means your dog is unable to regulate its body
temperature and needs assistance.
Temperatures are on the
fall as we approach winter, dropping from 27 °C in October to 25 °C in November,
meaning a much more comfortable climate is on its way.
The
mean sea
temperature falls to around 17 °C during November, which is on the cool side for swimming in, but warmer than during December to April, where sea
temperatures range from only 15 °C to 16 °C.
Last
fall set a new
temperature record for the instrumental period (since 1864) which was about one degree C above the previous record (three months
mean).
For years scientists have been warning that solar activity (a.k.a. sunspots) has been
falling, and that could
mean cooler global
temperatures are on the way.
This
means, monthly global
temperatures have not
fallen below average for...
The trend difference
means, that from 1979 to 2008 the CO2 - rise per year compared to the global
temperatures has
fallen 0,5 ppm / year, or the other way around: It now takes approx.
Of course there is a
meaning when it rises and when it
falls, even if it only tells us that the oceans breath with the breath of
temperature.
When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that
mean global
temperatures have generally risen,
fallen, or remained relatively constant?
Other experts point out one of the biggest natural factors behind the plateau is the fact that in 2008 the
temperature cycle in the Pacific flipped from «warm mode», in which it had been locked for the previous 40 years, to «cold mode»,
meaning surface water
temperatures fell.
Global
mean temperatures in 2011 did not reach the record - setting levels of 2010, but were still the highest observed in a La Niña year, and Arctic sea - ice extent
fell to near - record - low levels.
I fear that this edifice will not begin to crumble unless and until the
mean global
temperature falls demonstrably.
Geologist Dr. David Deming: «If the current cooling trend continues, the theory of global warming faces imminent extinction» — Deming: «The
mean global
temperature has not risen in 17 years and has been slowly
falling for approximately the past 10 years» — «Falling temperatures are giving climate alarmists chills
falling for approximately the past 10 years» — «
Falling temperatures are giving climate alarmists chills
Falling temperatures are giving climate alarmists chills»
Even if you claim that is a result rather a cause of
falling temperatures, the fact that it is rising quickly
means you don't have to worry about glaciers in London or New York quite just yet.
I know what you
mean about watching too closely the rise and
fall of
temperatures and ice extents and hoping that it gets cooler just so that any warming can't be used in the CAGW propaganda.
Using this ensemble, we show, firstly, that recent NH
mean temperatures fall within the range of expected multidecadal variability.
It seems the physical nature of clouds reflecting radiation sould
mean «
falling cloud cover is causing
temperatures to rise?»
Snowpack is melting earlier as winter and spring
temperatures rise, and in most states an increasing percentage of winter precipitation is
falling as rain,
meaning there is often less snowpack to begin with.
But the forecast also indicates
temperatures will be warmer than normal, which could
mean most of that precipitation
falls as rain, not snow.
The daily
mean temperature would
fall while the daily and seasonal range would increase.
Other in situ and satellite data suggest that even though the seasonal ice cover was formed later in the
fall of 2007, the
mean thickness of first year ice cover is comparable to that of the previous two seasons because of lower snow accumulation and lower air
temperatures and thus, faster growth.
Over this period the
mean CR intensity appears to have
fallen by less than 0.6 % using the data of Bazilevskaya et al. (2008)... the increase in
temperature predicted [as a result] is 0.002 C, a value that is quite negligible to the Global Warming in this period...
The first: «When compared with pre-1800s levels, do you think that
mean global
temperatures have generally risen,
fallen, or remained relatively constant?»
That
means that also the
temperature must
fall with different rate at different values of x. Thus it can be independent on x at one altitude only and that altitude is likely to be the surface as a boundary condition.
Combined with diminished precipitation, high
temperatures in California are causing soils and vegetation to lose moisture earlier in the spring and stay dry later in the
fall,
meaning the landscape is flammable for more of the year.
Here, summer
temperatures struggle to get above − 20 °C and monthly
means fall below − 60 °C in winter.
The delay also
means that the
fall off in bulk TSI around 2004 presages a
fall in surface
temperatures around about one sunspot later, around 2017: 2004 + 13 = 2017.
The climate plans that countries have submitted (known as Nationally Determined Contributions or NDCs) would push global warming to 2.6 - 3.7 C above pre-industrial levels,
meaning countries will
fall short of the goal of limiting warming to «well below 2C» and «to pursue efforts to limit the
temperature increase to 1.5 C».