The important point to note is that adiabatic descent involves
a falling parcel of air contracting and heating despite there being no heat drawn by it from the surroundings.
BTW, please don't answer with something that tries to make the local thermal motion of single molecules into «lifting and
falling parcels of air».
Not exact matches
Such changes in PE relative to KE result in density differences which cause different
parcels of air to change their weights and rise or
fall at different rates.
-- If a
parcel of air is lifted, its pressure is DECREASED, since pressure decreases with height, and its temperature
falls due to the expansion.
Now you want to assert that adiabatic lapse a phenomena that every single derivation
of it requires a) that the gas be adiabatic, that is, a perfect insulator, which real gases (even ideal ones) are not; and b) be uplifting and downfalling — it is the «adiabatic expansion» that occurs as
air parcels lift and
fall due to variations in buoyancy that establish the rate, after all — some how lapses vertically along «real g» intead
of horizontally opposite to the enormous density gradient due to 10,000 g that determines the actual direction
of convection and buoyant force in the frame
of the gas.
At the surface, increased pressure from injecting water vapour into a
parcel of air via evaporation causes the
parcel to rise so that surface pressure below it
falls.
In fact the sensible heat or a portion
of it gets radiated to space so the heated
air parcel never becomes as light as it was when it contained water vapour so it becomes denser and heavier and must
fall.