Sentences with phrase «falls under the question»

The inspiration and inerrancy of scripture was the first piece in my theology to fall under question that started my long road of deconstruction.
The governor also defended the economic development spending in western New York, primarily for SolarCity, a company whose finances have fallen under question.
Denerstein writes that communications from supporters or bidders for casino development that fall under questions regarding licensing, support or opposition to a particular casino proposal or questions and comments regarding the application review process should be avoided.
It just falls under the question of how to deal with delinquency that happens to involve the circumstance of allegedly paying cash and having it stolen, which is a hard question.

Not exact matches

There remains a valid legal question to these licensure fights: Since Square simply processes payment information, and doesn't actually transmit money itself, why should it have to fall under the transmission regulations of all 50 states?
I like posing this question because the interviewee's response will tell me which «c» (cocky or confident) they fall under
Stephanie Link, Managing Director at Nuveen, which has $ 970 billion in assets under management, already owns Facebook and she's looking to buy more if the stock falls in reaction to Zuckerberg's questioning.
The question that almost immediately follows is whether the discipline should fall under the purview of sales or marketing.
Unlike agents within the company's advisor network, independent agents who choose to sell Principal's products aren't under any contractual obligation to do so and questions remain on whom the fiduciary obligation falls: the insurance company or the distributor?
If he had asked the question you're posing, then yes, I would agree that «creationism» should be taught under Religious Education or Religious Studies as it obviously does not fall under Science.
Also, in response to the way you twisted your question, the so - called holy wars that you and Thor are referring to were also run by governments so also fall under the whole «nations supressing other religions» clause of your statement and are invalid.
There are all kinds of mechanisms in religion to discourage questioning it, leading me to suspect that they know it falls apart under scrutiny.
But what I said was that those who choose to sin again and again without thought of the consequences (again I don't know a practicing Christian who does, but I think most self identified Christians fall under that category) give me reason to question their salvation.
But actual entities do fall under the principle of relativity; therefore, the view in question must be false.
I bet your defenses will crumble under questioning and you will fall back on the same tired arguments that all christians seem to use when cornered.
I'm not aware of his ideas about vision, but I am sure he would seriously question modern ideas about church, which vision would fall under.
These developments were confined to questions of church polity until the Puritans landed in Massachusetts Bay, where they fell under the influence of the politically radical «Pilgrims» who had preceded them there.
The Daily News did not ask him the obvious questions about whether or not he saw a pot of gold at the base of the falls or if he started singing «Somewhere Under the Rainbow» or any hard - hitting journalistic questions like that.
Some people say there are no stupid questions, but this one may fall under that category, lol.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Families who have a «green» household and only use detergents that fall under that category may need extra steps in their laundry cycle to properly cleanse their diapers.We would love to work with you on finding a system that works for you, please contact us with any questions.
More questions have been raised about the Buffalo Billion, too, as the project falls under the scrutiny of the U.S. attorney's office amid a sprawling investigation.
They were then asked questions about different practices that fall under the four competencies.
As long as a post falls under our broad definition of «current science,» we're comfortable with difficult questions and a variety of opinions.
Convinced that all magic is for show and all spiritualism is hokum, Stanley observes the glamorous Sophie Baker (Emma Stone) at work, only to fall under her spell, and question his lifelong disavowal of love and metaphysics.
Mary Elizabeth Winstead is fine, sometimes on point and other times under performing, as the editor who first supports Webb and his story before falling in line with everyone else questioning his journalistic ethics.
Does the request in question really fall under your jurisdiction?
Short answer questions fall under the purview of open - ended questions in eLearning assessment, which means that students can quickly veer off topic without proper guidance.
Visiting HGSE last fall for the Askwith Forum, Everybody's Talking about Equity, But Nobody Knows the Meaning of the Word, Davis discusses these questions of equity with the Harvard EdCast, and examines the foundational role of schools in a community under the national spotlight.
Let us first consider the question of which subjects fall under the purview of Common Core.
(Murray's staffers had baited DeVos» with a question about students defrauded by Trump University who received some money back in a $ 25 million settlement, prompting DeVos» staffers to note that «Trump University was not a recipient of federal student aid, nor an accredited college or university, and therefore would not fall under my jurisdiction as Secretary of Education.»)
Design Question 8 falls under Lesson Segment Enacted on the Spot.
note: I know i should be asking one question at a time but these are all sub-question and fall under the main one
If your situation falls under these main considerations when it comes to home refinancing, then you should answer «yes» to the question, «Should I refinance my home now?»
There's no question, though, that the intermediate - term uptrend is under duress — the indexes topped out more than six weeks ago, small - and mid-cap stocks haven't made any net progress in months and some key sectors (like financial stocks and, last week, chip stocks) have fallen by the wayside.
Just reiterating one more question — if I do not let out my property and keep it vacant in this case, will I still be eligible for entire loan interest deduction OR I will fall under 200,000 max limit?
If the answer to the latter of the previously mentioned two questions that businesses may ask is about «making me feel better», «calming me», or any other benefit of having an animal, that would fall under comfort, and the ADA specifically denies emotional support as a task.
Just recently, Australian and Belgium authorities are now questioning whether loot boxes fall under gambling legislation.
Once the stuff of shouting matches in museum lecture halls, such questions about painting's remit must have been hard to hear under the thump of techno beats in Berlin after 1989, when the Wall fell, history ended and we all became contemporary.
The land in question falls under the 1873 Ojibway Treaty 3, which contains a «harvesting clause» that gives Grassy Narrows rights to hunt and fish, except on land «required or taken up [by Canada] for... lumbering or other purposes.»
The question though is whether this would properly fall within the scope of practice for paralegals under Bylaw 4.
The question the Court needed to answer here was, firstly, whether housing benefits fall under the concept of social security and social protection, and secondly, whether the Italian authorities could limit the principle of equal treatment to «core benefits» of the social security system in such a way that it would exclude housing benefits.
Two questions arose: (i) whether s 204 contained an express requirement under which the county court was required by an enactment to make a decision applying the principles that were applied by the court on an application for judicial review, thus placing s 204 appeals within the public law category; and (ii) if not, whether there were any other reasons requiring the application of judicial review principles with the result that s 204 appeals fell within the post-LASPO 2012 civil legal aid regime.
However, I would argue that the most desirable way in which the Luxembourg Court could exercise this authority would be to decide that the question of revoking notification falls under the constitutional requirements of the Member State.
One question I'm consistently asked is, «What injuries fall under the category of nursing home abuse or neglect?»
My question is whether this is a case of fraud in the state of California or falls under some other legal category.
Rather, the question of capacity at the time a will was made falls to be determined under existing common law principles.
But, at any rate, the place to begin is to realize that the question «Under which country's jurisdiction does a website fall
Other times, the questions fall under immigration or family law.
Questions to ask: In your free legal consultation, if your lawyer informs you that your matter would fall under hourly rates, ask what the hourly rate is and how long the matter will take.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z