Schneiderman has tussled in court with Trump before, having led a class - cation lawsuit filed over
false advertising claims made against Trump University.
The senators, all members of the committee, introduced the Youth Sports Concussion Act earlier this year to help ensure that safety standards for sports equipment, including football helmets, are based on the latest science and curb
false advertising claims made by manufacturers to increase protective sports gear sales.
Not exact matches
In the summer of 1998, Gillette announced it was suing Optiva for
false -
advertising claims made against its Braun unit.
Token issuers who
make misleading statements may be liable for breach of contract,
false advertising, and fraudulent or negligent inducement, to name just a few
claims.
Baby Milk Action has won cases at the
Advertising Standards Authority proving claims that SMA is the best formula made in other advertising are false (all formulas have to comply with legal composition req
Advertising Standards Authority proving
claims that SMA is the best formula
made in other
advertising are false (all formulas have to comply with legal composition req
advertising are
false (all formulas have to comply with legal composition requirements).
Udall has led efforts in Congress to improve equipment safety standards and curb
false advertising claims, focusing on ensuring parents, coaches and players have the information they need to
make important decisions about how to prevent head injuries.
An extensive National Academy of Sciences report previously found a lack of scientific evidence that helmets and other protective devices designed for young athletes reduce concussion risk — yet some manufacturers continue to use
false advertising claims that prevent athletes, parents and coaches from
making informed safety decisions.
They were sued via a class action lawsuit in 2013 for allegedly
making false claims in
advertising the product Pro Tribulus, involving
claims about the product's ability to boost testosterone and promote muscle building.
There is also a pending FDA investigation over the
claims the company has
made many
false marketing and
advertising claims.
In January 2007, the FTC fined the marketers of 4 weight loss pills a total of $ 25 million for
making false advertising claims.
In October 2004, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) alleged Cortislim
made false and unsubstantiated
claims in their
advertising regarding the weight loss effects of the diet pill.
K12's
false claims may have cost it money in California, but it continues to
make similar
claims of success in
advertising that is presently running in a number of states.
Rather than accurately self - identifying as a company whose entire structure and revenue is based on
making its money from writers, rather than from readers, vanity presses invariably engage in
false advertising,
claiming to be publishers, or «innovative» publishers, or to offer a «new type of professional opportunity» to writers, yada yada yada.
What's The Hydroxycut Settlement About The lawsuit
claims that defendant, Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A. Inc,
made false and misleading statements in its labeling and
advertising regarding the effectiveness of Hydroxycut dietary supplement products.
Genuine issues of fact precluded summary judgment on a consumer's
claims against a seafood producer for allegedly
making unlawful,
false, and misleading advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh,
false, and misleading
advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014
advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL),
False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh,
False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014
Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh, L.).
Plaintiff, a dissatisfied attorney, has brought suit against the entire legal tech industry, alleging that the
claims and promises it
made in 2016 amount to fraud and
false advertising.»
Like the general misleading
advertising provisions of the Competition Act, the general impression is relevant to determining whether a
claim made by a telemarketer is materially
false or misleading.
For a
claim to be misleading, it must be proven that: (i) a representation (i.e., an
advertising or marketing
claim) has been
made, (ii) to the public, (iii) to promote a product or business interest, (iv) that is literally
false or misleading (or with a
false or misleading general impression) and (v) the
claim is «material».
I work for a travel insurer who distributes product through several online sources and: * A traveler has the opportunity to read policy exclusions in the same way they would on a comparison site * All our products offer a free look period — it's the law not a comparison site selling advantage * We don't use
false advertising to sell — unfair
claim to
make in such a broad way, especially when this article does just that.
The
claim was raised by Taylor - Copeland legal firm, where Mrs. & Mr. Breitman were accused of selling unregistered securities, committing securities fraud,
false advertising and unfair competition («by
making material misrepresentations and omissions»).
We also have powerful regulations in place to keep dangerous medical devices off the market, and the FTC can keep manufacturers from
making false claims in
advertising.