Sentences with phrase «false assertions about»

Of all the politicians in yesterday's hearing who are known climate change deniers, West Virginia Rep. David McKinley gets the tin foil hat award for his completely false assertions about climate change science.

Teacher Match and Hanover Research are the companies specifically named and targeted for marketing and selling a series of highly false assumptions about teaching and teachers, highly false claims about value - added (without empirical research in support), highly false assertions about how value - added estimates can be used for better teacher evaluation / accountability, and highly false sales pitches about what they as value - added / research «experts» can do to help with the complex statistics needed for the above

Cohen used a pair of court filings late Wednesday to end the lawsuits he filed in January, which claimed the dossier contained a series of false assertions about him.

Not exact matches

As for her assertion that newcomers should find the process rewarding enough to brave an intimidating tableau of wires and capacitors and diodes, well, just think about how some people claim to love assembling IKEA furniture: the careful laying out of the parts, painstaking examination of instructions, a few false starts and, ultimately, the satisfaction of things slotting into place as the final product takes shape.

That's why I asked to you back up your baseless assertions about these false probabilities and explain why they are credible in any way.

There are still a few lemmings about that try to make that false assertion but in so doing only expose their own ignorance to historical fact.

all this nonsense about «this is what happens when we abandon god» can be shown to be a false assertion.

They were either true or false; as assertions about the nature of reality they were of the same order as philosophic statements.

Wilson is calling on DiNapoli, who was in Buffalo yesterday raising concerns about the state budget, not to sign off on the spending plan (once it's officially finished), insisting that the comptroller has the power to refuse to certify — an assertion DiNapoli insists is false (as did one of his predecessors, H. Carl McCall, who was needled on the same point by his then - primary opponent in 2002, Andrew Cuomo).

This last point, which according to the judge «shock [ed] the conscience,» came almost entirely thanks to the testimony of Thomas Kane (see prior posts about his Bill and Melinda Gates funded research here and here) and the testimony of Raj Chetty, Kane's colleague at Harvard who has also been the source of many prior posts (see here and here), but whose research at the source of his testimony has also been recently (and seriously) scrutinized given how bias in his study actually made false this key assertion.

And with regard to Svensmark's («vague but false») assertion about meteorologists and a lack of a mechanism, I can only presume that arises because all those meteorologists (presumably those that Svensmark was associated with / contacted on the matter — or does he mean all meteorologists?)

The graph I found (ACIA *) appears to be cut off at about 2003 which makes it slightly favor what is IMNHSO a false assertion, but even so it doesn't look that way if one uses unbiased eyes.

However, since a high proportion of misnamed «skeptics» are in fact deliberate liars, who endlessly repeat assertions that they well know have been repeatedly shown to be false, it will probably have little effect on the fake, phony, Exxon - Mobil sponsored «debate» about anthropogenic climate change.

The source document, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007 Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), has been under harsh scrutiny over the past weeks for a number of blunders, including the Climategate scandal, bogus claims about Himalayan glacier melt, false assertions The Netherlands are drowning, deceptive hysteria over conditions in the Amazon, exaggerations of vanishing polar ice caps, and fraudulent cover - up of Chinese temperature data.

You could argue I suppose that continental drift played a factor and that is an internal forcing but frankly, if you have to move a continent to make my assertion false, I'm no more concerned than I am about a few tenths of a degree over 130 years.

A group of 12 scientists analyzed Ridley and Peiser's Wall Street Journal article, and found that it «contains numerous false statements, cherry - picked evidence, and misleading assertions about climate science.

Unless the oceans warmed up about 0.7 °C since July... NOAA's assertion that ocean temperatures are at a record high is simply false.

You set up false dilemmas (fight denialists OR effect change) to make it look like we can't do more than one thing at a time, then apply spin and misrepresentations («[denialists] are of a very insignificant nature» (note who's listening to them) «more effort is being expended now on a few denalists than warranted» (note: unsubstantiated assertion), «Is the question about a few snakes biting a few people or doing far more» (shorter: «a few snake bites are OK!»)-RRB-

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley Three - quarters (rounded up to 97.1 %) of all commenters expressing an opinion on my recent post about Dana Nuccitelli's attempt at ex-post-facto justification of the false assertion in the lamentable Cook et al. paper of a non-existent 97.1 % «scientific consensus» that turned out on peer - reviewed inspection to be 0.3 %, enjoyed the...

A group of 12 scientists analyzed Peiser and Ridley's Wall Street Journal Article, and found that it «contains numerous false statements, cherry - picked evidence, and misleading assertions about climate science.