Catholics follow and teach
false doctrine believing that the church saves.
Not exact matches
I get that someone who has messed up their marriage might be your friend and ministry associate, and that you might want to give them the benefit of the doubt and
believe them... But when they invent a
false doctrine of spiritual versus legal marriage, surely some kind of red flag has to go up?
The Methodists took constant criticism from people who
believed false reports about their
doctrines and practices.
«The blame can not be laid at the door of those who are seeking to be faithful, who are saying «look we want to be an Episcopal Church, we
believe in bishops, but we
believe in biblical bishops who hold to sound
doctrine and publically refute
false doctrine and
false behaviour.»
Well for one thing because your pastor is preaching
false doctrine and getting your «flock»: to
believe it and in Mark 8 JESUS said «beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Herod.»
The workers of lawlessness will be cast away, even those who at one time
believed in Christ or were seduced by the
false doctrine of
believing that God's law no longer applied to them and that they could sin with abandon and impunity.
The fact that neither you nor the church has yet identified ANY SORT of «
false doctrine» that Kate was supposedly teaching, leads one to
believe that her question must be the REAL reason she was ex-communicated as no other viable reason has been presented or even hinted at!
If you
believe satan was his father then you are
believe in the
false doctrine of the seed of the serpent which suggests that satan had sexual intercourse with Eve.That just wouldnt have happened as God would have intervened.There wasnt two blood lines as people have suggested.
In a more spiritual sense, if you begin to
believe false teaching, you have fallen away from correct
doctrine.
He said «preach the gospels and baptize those who
believe» He told the Apostles to beware of
false doctrine (Mark 8).
it has not deviated from known biblical
doctrine, and it will not, I
believe, lead a non believer astray or promote
false doctrine,
In the opinion, not of bad men, but of the best men, no belief which is contrary to truth can be really useful: and can you prevent such men from urging that plea, when they are charged with culpability for denying some
doctrine which they are told is useful, but which they
believe to be
false?