Sentences with phrase «false doctrines any»

These are the same people that vote for Republicans and Teabaggers, b / c they want to inflict their extremism on others, and undermine our government as part of their doomsday agenda and its false doctrines of apolcalyptic «exceptionalism» and «dominionism.»

If someone tries to teach you something that goes contrary to what God says in the Bible, then you are to mark that man (in this case woman) and have nothing further to do with her and her false doctrines / teachings.

Paul even tells Timothy to command men NOT TO TEACH false doctrines.

But here is what I don't get, Rhonda: You feel that «heretical teachings» and «false doctrines» must be «dealt with».

Nor would it have taught false doctrines.

And to add to the confusion, Wills claims to admire two Catholics above all others: St. Augustine and Cardinal Newman, even though Wills» own pontifications on sex differ entirely from Augustine's views, and his lucubrations on development bear no resemblance to Newman's own painstaking historical analysis, which would point out to Wills that false doctrines can not be said to «develop.»

No need to take my word, warning comes before destruction and it Jesus Christ who shall give you the very evidence that you refused to accept while being alive and by then, it will be too late for the unbeliever and the religious people who has taught false doctrines.

These statements are all false doctrines not supported by Scripture.

Jesus knew that there would be false predictions, false prophets, false doctrines.

Wills» Syllabus errorum leaves virtually no room for what used to be the liberal understanding of the development of Catholic doctrine; as Wills surely understands, false doctrines are not said to «develop.»

3 As I urged you when I went into Macedonia, stay there in Ephesus so that you may command certain people not to teach false doctrines any longer

Before this happens, there will be a «great falling away» from the faith because false science (evolution) along with false doctrines (esp dualism) will fall, thus leaving the truth — Christ and His coming Kingdom which is «not of this world».

But one must also understand the ignorance of man like yourself, who has been mislead by false doctrines about God and have been blinded from the truth.

(read YOUR Bible - maybe you missed that) Judging and condemnation are part of the false doctrine (Mark 8 - the leaven of the Pharisees) that Jesus told you to avoid.

When «evangelicals» get into politics, their hypocrisy and false doctrine is inevitably exposed, and they bear no fruit in spreading the true Gospel.

And, I do not mean the Earth Religion, tree hugging, butterfly feelings, abortionists defending animal rights, kick the Bible out of society morans finding peace in Bhuddism or any other false doctrine.

So the Michigan preacher is not preaching false doctrine.

So many preachers are preaching false doctrine that it seems trifling to focus on this particular preacher.

The Reformation introduce a wave of man - made false doctrine (the most degenerate of all being Calvinism - TULIP) It is IMPOSSIBLE to be in a church and practice Christian faith.

this «beautiful piece of work» is false doctrine by a false teacher — an apostate... it neglects to lay out the requirement and that is submission to Jesus Christ.

Like I was saying, cherry - picking interpretations that conflict with the overarching comprehensive purpose of the Bible are a sure sign of false doctrine coming from fallen minds, even if it comes from someone professing to be «Christian».

Catholics follow and teach false doctrine believing that the church saves.

There may be a few exceptions, but most believers who avoid meeting with other believers will eventually weaken in their walk of faith and are susceptible to false doctrine.

Therefore theirs is a false doctrine.

He can lead us into false doctrine.

Considering that it took the Church about 300 years, long after they had made up their minds about theology, to start picking scripture to match that doctrine, and that the oldest known copt of the bible has over 27,000 «corrections» written all over it, how can you be sure that the New Testament isn't full of false doctrine to begin with?

Me I'll go with Star Wars before I will accept a false doctrine, which by the way, warns against false doctrines.

So to have someone who can finally speak from experience and explain to me that most of them don't understand their own doctrine, but it's still not an excuse because it's a damaging and false doctrine that the Bible clearly contradicts — is incredibly helpful and healing to my soul.

«Something» inside... dare I say the Holy Spirit (still praying and would never want to say something is a revelation from God and it is not) is leading me to think it is a «big deal» and that these people whom I love are being led astray and spewing false doctrine that appeals to their own prideful proclivities and demeans others in the process.

But anyway, I myself struggle with the same question you asked about pastors who know and embrace the full implications of Calvinism, and I have to say I DO regard a pastor like that as one who teaches False Doctrine and who is dangerous because of it.

satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz

Scripture is full of warnings of the dangers and consequences of false doctrine.

As a sidebar here and for my earlier responses about unfair grouping of all believers with promoters of false doctrine, I should mention that Jesus warned us to strive to enter His Kingdom through the narrow gate, because the many who claim to serve Him and come to the wide and easy gate will be turned away.

I get that someone who has messed up their marriage might be your friend and ministry associate, and that you might want to give them the benefit of the doubt and believe them... But when they invent a false doctrine of spiritual versus legal marriage, surely some kind of red flag has to go up?

Still others stray from the faith (1 Tim 1:5 - 6), shipwreck their faith (1 Tim 1:18 - 20), fall away from the faith (1 Tim 4:1 - 3), deny the faith (1 Tim 5:8), cast off initial faith to follow Satan (1 Tim 5:12 - 15), stray from the faith by loving money (1 Tim 6:9 - 10), teach false doctrine (1 Tim 6:20 - 21), and deny Christ and live faithless lives (2 Tim 2:11 - 13).

We can no longer allow the corruption of scripture to be used to justify abusive and horribly damaging false doctrine to be taught.

False doctrine is what all religions claim other religions teach.

«The blame can not be laid at the door of those who are seeking to be faithful, who are saying «look we want to be an Episcopal Church, we believe in bishops, but we believe in biblical bishops who hold to sound doctrine and publically refute false doctrine and false behaviour.»

Most religions have adopted false doctrine (and the know it) and preach it to others for a profit.

Not all agreed with Calvin's teaching and theology, and many accused Calvin of teaching false doctrine.

Tietjen's own efforts to defend the faculty and gain a tenable compromise ultimately became grounds for his dismissal on the charge of «allowing and fostering false doctrine.»

Credence must be given to the writer in one area though in that Christendom has failed in some ways to properly «speak» or represent Christ from their pulpits and daily walk; some spew out false doctrine and self - serving «religiosity» that one can not be surprised that the Enemy (Satan) is now using those same words and actions to accuse them through writers such as we see here.

But as mentioned i'm increasingly seeing a widespread convergence of lies, deceit and false doctrine (both rational and empirical) across politics, media and entertainment, economic and even academic.

They are two sides to the same coin of false doctrine.

I mean, I have a very liberal approach to life in general, but I fear the Lord enough to stay away from preaching something that might be a false doctrine.

Sadly, Christendom and it's churches have been teaching false doctrine for century's.

The trinity is a false doctrine invented by the «church / government» at the council of Nicea in 325 AD so that the pagans would feel more comfortable allowing the church into their system.

The declaration's negation, following immediately upon its affirmation, makes this clear: «We reject the false doctrine, as though the Church could and would have to acknowledge as a source of its proclamation, apart from and beside the one Word of God, still other events and powers, figures and truths, as God's revelation.»

Well for one thing because your pastor is preaching false doctrine and getting your «flock»: to believe it and in Mark 8 JESUS said «beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Herod.»

RTC, how is he preaching false doctrine?