These are the same people that vote for Republicans and Teabaggers, b / c they want to inflict their extremism on others, and undermine our government as part of their doomsday agenda and
its false doctrines of apolcalyptic «exceptionalism» and «dominionism.»
satans aim was to stop the fulfillment of the seed that would crush satan underfoot.This hybrid between the angels and man created giants abominations in Gods eyes.They also were a threat to Gods people as can be seen by the giants in the land of caanan after the flood.If we agree on that then there is no way that Eve would have had intercourse with satan [
false doctrine of the seed of satan -RCB- because the blood lines were still untainted by angelic beings or satan at the time of Noah maybe that is also why the genealogy of Christ is well presented with no surprises apart from Hagar and Ruth these two were gentiles that shows Gods mercy grace was always there to all nations he accepts people by faith not by race.Prior to the flood the mixing of the angels and man must have been widespread after the flood these beings were present but in limited numbers and God told his people to destroy them as they were abominations but they were a threat to Gods people.It would be interesting to hear what the rabbis had to say on this matter as i would think the stories would have been past down from generation to the next.Especially regarding the flood.God promised he would never flood the earth again but a time is coming when the earth will be judged not by flood but by fire Jesus is our ark and we are safe in him.brentnz
I get that someone who has messed up their marriage might be your friend and ministry associate, and that you might want to give them the benefit of the doubt and believe them... But when they invent
a false doctrine of spiritual versus legal marriage, surely some kind of red flag has to go up?
The workers of lawlessness will be cast away, even those who at one time believed in Christ or were seduced by
the false doctrine of believing that God's law no longer applied to them and that they could sin with abandon and impunity.
God did not just willy - nilly forgive mankind as suggested in the blasphemous
false doctrine of «unconditional love.»
However, I would never harm a Copt, because of
his false doctrine of Christ.
If you believe satan was his father then you are believe in
the false doctrine of the seed of the serpent which suggests that satan had sexual intercourse with Eve.That just wouldnt have happened as God would have intervened.There wasnt two blood lines as people have suggested.
Roman Catholicism added the Apocrypha to justify
its false doctrine of Purgatory / Indulgences and the Assumption of Mary among other false doctrines.
I was pleased to see that in the notes on Matthew 7:16 - 20, the reader is informed that the bad fruit in question is
the false doctrine of the false teachers.
I absolutely condemn
the false doctrine of Mormonism — a religious belief made up by a delusional founder named Joseph Smith.
Not exact matches
(read YOUR Bible - maybe you missed that) Judging and condemnation are part
of the
false doctrine (Mark 8 - the leaven
of the Pharisees) that Jesus told you to avoid.
But one must also understand the ignorance
of man like yourself, who has been mislead by
false doctrines about God and have been blinded from the truth.
And, I do not mean the Earth Religion, tree hugging, butterfly feelings, abortionists defending animal rights, kick the Bible out
of society morans finding peace in Bhuddism or any other
false doctrine.
Before this happens, there will be a «great falling away» from the faith because
false science (evolution) along with
false doctrines (esp dualism) will fall, thus leaving the truth — Christ and His coming Kingdom which is «not
of this world».
The Reformation introduce a wave
of man - made
false doctrine (the most degenerate
of all being Calvinism - TULIP) It is IMPOSSIBLE to be in a church and practice Christian faith.
this «beautiful piece
of work» is
false doctrine by a
false teacher — an apostate... it neglects to lay out the requirement and that is submission to Jesus Christ.
Like I was saying, cherry - picking interpretations that conflict with the overarching comprehensive purpose
of the Bible are a sure sign
of false doctrine coming from fallen minds, even if it comes from someone professing to be «Christian».
1 Timothy 4:1 - 6 foretold exactly about the fact that
false teachers would teach about such
doctrines, among them, forbidding marriage and goes on to refer to such teachings as teachings
of demons.
When it was first said that the sun stood still and the world turned round, the common sense
of mankind declared the
doctrine false; but the old saying
of Vox populi, vox Dei, as every philosopher knows, can not be trusted in science.
There may be a few exceptions, but most believers who avoid meeting with other believers will eventually weaken in their walk
of faith and are susceptible to
false doctrine.
And especially after the Noachian Flood, did
false religion take a leap, with
false religious
doctrines and practices such as the trinity, immortality
of the soul, that God torments people in a «hellfire», the establishment
of a clergy class, the teaching
of «personal salvation» as more important than the sanctification
of God's name
of Jehovah (Matt 6:9), the sitting in a church while a religious leader preaches a sermon, but the «flock» is not required to do anything more, except put money when the basket is passed.
Considering that it took the Church about 300 years, long after they had made up their minds about theology, to start picking scripture to match that
doctrine, and that the oldest known copt
of the bible has over 27,000 «corrections» written all over it, how can you be sure that the New Testament isn't full
of false doctrine to begin with?
So to have someone who can finally speak from experience and explain to me that most
of them don't understand their own
doctrine, but it's still not an excuse because it's a damaging and
false doctrine that the Bible clearly contradicts — is incredibly helpful and healing to my soul.
But anyway, I myself struggle with the same question you asked about pastors who know and embrace the full implications
of Calvinism, and I have to say I DO regard a pastor like that as one who teaches
False Doctrine and who is dangerous because
of it.
Scripture is full
of warnings
of the dangers and consequences
of false doctrine.
As a sidebar here and for my earlier responses about unfair grouping
of all believers with promoters
of false doctrine, I should mention that Jesus warned us to strive to enter His Kingdom through the narrow gate, because the many who claim to serve Him and come to the wide and easy gate will be turned away.
It brings to light the tangled hierarchy in their
doctrine and shows what their beliefs actually mean using only the logical quantifiers
of propositional calculus, that either (Mormonism is
FALSE or Women are DAMNED).
We can no longer allow the corruption
of scripture to be used to justify abusive and horribly damaging
false doctrine to be taught.
I am saying that your
false and slanderous accusation
of «give someone a
doctrine», you pulled out or your God rejecting self willed basket
of ways to assault the Word
of God.
It is demonstrably
false historically: There is constant material change through the history
of doctrine.
«The blame can not be laid at the door
of those who are seeking to be faithful, who are saying «look we want to be an Episcopal Church, we believe in bishops, but we believe in biblical bishops who hold to sound
doctrine and publically refute
false doctrine and
false behaviour.»
All bishops are accused
of failing to «teach sound
doctrine and the refusal to refute, publicly,
false teaching and practice».
Wills» Syllabus errorum leaves virtually no room for what used to be the liberal understanding
of the development
of Catholic
doctrine; as Wills surely understands,
false doctrines are not said to «develop.»
Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact
doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven
false due to the lack
of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leav
of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK
OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leav
OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.
Not all agreed with Calvin's teaching and theology, and many accused Calvin
of teaching
false doctrine.
fundamentalists working in Guatemala agree with Swaggart that Catholicism is a
false cult» and the «
doctrine of devils.»
Tietjen's own efforts to defend the faculty and gain a tenable compromise ultimately became grounds for his dismissal on the charge
of «allowing and fostering
false doctrine.»
But as mentioned i'm increasingly seeing a widespread convergence
of lies, deceit and
false doctrine (both rational and empirical) across politics, media and entertainment, economic and even academic.
Every faith and religion upon earth that do not follow the Apostle's
Doctrine is
false and
of the devil and is bound for the lake.
They are two sides to the same coin
of false doctrine.
The trinity is a
false doctrine invented by the «church / government» at the council
of Nicea in 325 AD so that the pagans would feel more comfortable allowing the church into their system.
The declaration's negation, following immediately upon its affirmation, makes this clear: «We reject the
false doctrine, as though the Church could and would have to acknowledge as a source
of its proclamation, apart from and beside the one Word
of God, still other events and powers, figures and truths, as God's revelation.»
Surely you can see the wisdom
of Jefferson's «
false view
of Jefferson's so - called «wall
of separation»
doctrine».
This is all condoned under a
false view
of Jefferson's so - called «wall
of separation»
doctrine.
That is the
false immanentism
of those types
of spiritualist
doctrines in Christianity which endanger the clear understanding
of the sovereign power
of God's grace.
Well for one thing because your pastor is preaching
false doctrine and getting your «flock»: to believe it and in Mark 8 JESUS said «beware
of the leaven
of the Pharisees and Herod.»
At the hub
of a concerned effort among Protestant churches for revitalization is the struggle for a just peace among the nations, It is the
false use
of money that continues to make the nuclear arms race possible, now again under the new nuclear
doctrine.
But the ground
of the ambiguity does not consist in the idea that Whitehead's theological
doctrines are
false; rather the whole position is not fully developed in terms
of coherently interrelated religious categories.
Lest the Deutsche Christen
of the Nazi church (or anyone else) mistake what this means, a clear reference to der Führer follows: «We reject the
false doctrine [that] the Church could and would have to acknowledge as a source
of its proclamation, apart from and besides this one Word
of God, still other events, powers, figures, and truths as God's revelation.»
Much
false doctrine comes about because people don't know how to rightly divide the word
of truth.