Sentences with phrase «false evidence supporting»

Pretty compelling Colin, but haven't you heard that Satan strode to all corners of the Earth, as well as the Heavens, planting false evidence supporting the theory of evolution?

Not exact matches

The Christian God is not only without objective evidence to support its truth, there is much objective evidence that it is false.

Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.

Except that the scriptures have no evidence to support them and they have been proven false.

I also question science, because while there is good science there is also a lot of false science (only looking for evidence that supports a pre-determined answer).

This is a false statement since it relys upon the premise that soul's exist when there is no evidence to support that hypothesis.

This false dichotomy can wreak havoc on young Christians raised to believe they have to choose between God and evolution, and who after encountering evidence in support of the theory, abandon faith altogether.

It is a rant, and nothing more, as evidence by the wildly false claim the author made as to the supposed lack of evidence supporting the claims she is railing against.

Research has shown that more and more people feel that infant formula is equivalent to human milk, based on manufacturer claims that are false, misleading, and not supported by the evidence.

Responding further to questions posed by Karim Naatogmah about his ban, Dr. Bilal said «the ban on me in the USA came about in the 90s and it was based on a false accusation which had no evidence to support it.»

These legends have either been proven false, or there is no scientific evidence to support them.»

Ryan and Roverts believe that some or many of the other American scientists must have: (1) foresaken their search for the truth, (2) knowingly espoused false conclusions, or (3) remained silent about the scientific and engineering evidence supporting demolition as the true cause for the collapse of the 3 buildings on 9/11.

Back to the Experimental Evidence Denise Minger went not just beyond the bestselling book and into the abyss of thousands upon thousands of data points known loosely as the original monograph but traveled even further through the lands of the roughly one thousand references Campbell provides among his supporting evidence to find a critical study that Campbell himself had published showing, in fact, that the central thesis of his book — that animal foods, and specifically animal protein, are uniquely harmful to consume — iEvidence Denise Minger went not just beyond the bestselling book and into the abyss of thousands upon thousands of data points known loosely as the original monograph but traveled even further through the lands of the roughly one thousand references Campbell provides among his supporting evidence to find a critical study that Campbell himself had published showing, in fact, that the central thesis of his book — that animal foods, and specifically animal protein, are uniquely harmful to consume — ievidence to find a critical study that Campbell himself had published showing, in fact, that the central thesis of his book — that animal foods, and specifically animal protein, are uniquely harmful to consume — is false.

However to claim that this is the end of the story and the only, or even the most, healthy diet is also a false claim that the evidence does not support.

Questioning the basis of ideas enables all of us to reject claims that are based on false evidence and to recognise when evidence is being used selectively to support particular actions.

To give you a taste of what is coming in Part 2, the arguments can be summarized as: 1) Education does not lend itself to a single «best» approach, so the Gates effort to use science to discover best practices is unable to yield much productive fruit; 2) As a result, the Gates folks have mostly been falsely invoking science to advance practices and policies they prefer for which they have no scientific support; 3) Attempting to impose particular practices on the nation's education system is generating more political resistance than even the Gates Foundation can overcome, despite their focus on political influence and their devotion of significant resources to that effort; 4) The scale of the political effort required by the Gates strategy of imposing «best» practices is forcing Gates to expand its staffing to levels where it is being paralyzed by its own administrative bloat; and 5) The false invocation of science as a political tool to advance policies and practices not actually supported by scientific evidence is producing intellectual corruption among the staff and researchers associated with Gates, which will undermine their long - term credibility and influence.

Liability: § 1983 liability of mandatory reporters of suspected child abuse or neglect; even when (a) there is a reasonable basis to suspect abuse and (b) the report is not materially false — impermissibly chill child abuse reporting across the nation; (2) Can a First Amendment retaliation claim be maintained under Section 1983 against a statutorily mandated reporter of known or suspected child abuse when there is evidence in the record that would support a reasonable basis to suspect abuse and the report is not materially false; (3) Is a statutorily mandated reporter of known or suspected chi

There are many specific criticisms of commercial dog foods made in support of the BARF concept, but there is little evidence to support most of them, and some are clearly false.

The idea the most powerful console will reign supreme is a false premise, that has had not one single historical piece of evidence to support that people will flock to more power just because there is more power.

In addition, there is NO plausible alternative possibility for the warming despite Victor's false proclamations without supporting evidence.

These false arguments are used when one has few or no facts to support one's viewpoint against a scientific consensus or against overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

In the absence of supporting data, the default belief level for complex consistent (non-self-contradictory) propositions about the real world is infinitesimally above zero — they can not be said to be false, but nobody sensible would state that they are probably true without evidence.

Your false assumption is that the natural recovery from the LIA is due to human CO2 emissions, when in fact there is NO empirical, testable evidence supporting that belief.

The AGW hypothesis of tipping point, climate positive feedback is proven false after decades of zero empirical evidence supporting it.

Starting in 2005, building on a sequence of events seeking to obtain raw data, leading ultimately to the FOIA events central to the CRU controversy, McIntyre builds an iconoclastic website which at least implicitly supports the false propositions that climate change concerns rest primarily on paleoclimate evidence and that paleoclimate evidence is systematically skewed.

That later phrase is the infamous leaked memo phrase which has every appearance of being the only so - called evidence to support the accusation that fossil fuel companies paid skeptics to turn the certainty of man - caused global warming back into a «false theory.»

The first link in my article takes readers to a prior one where I show how the very same Sheldon Rampton appeared before a US House hearing and regurgitated an accusation phrase against skeptic scientists that was made famous by anti-skeptic book author Ross Gelbspan and the enviro - advocacy group Ozone Action in 1996 - 7 — these people have every appearance of being the epicenter of the accusation that skeptic scientists operate under a coal / oil industry directive to fabricate false assessments in exchange for mega-millions...... an accusation that has no evidence to support it that I can find, and its central piece of evidence is a 1991 coal industry memo that no one is allowed to see in its complete context.

The claim that «ExxonMobil hates your children,» the lawyers wrote, is «false and unsubstantiated,» though the attorneys did not offer any hard evidence to support their counterclaim.

If the evidence does not support the theory, then suspect that the theory is false.

Those factors include: her squandering of the time when she was paid support while also being intentionally unemployed; her unilateral move to Mexico accompanied by her express decision to not work or be underemployed; her failure to produce relevant evidence about her past and present financial circumstances in a timely fashion; her active misrepresentations to Mr. Street concerning her income; her filing of false evidence before this Court and the Provincial Court about her employment activities in Mexico; her delay in seeking spousal support; the hardship that would be borne by Mr. Street, A.S.S. and his new family members arising from her past (in) actions and in seeking support at this late date; and, her failure to comply with the Rules.

Evidence to support the idea that factually false charges are a legitimate alternative, and that pleading guilty to charges known to be factually false is not making a false statement to the court?

«In the present case the circumstances surrounding Mrs Rowlands» arrest and prosecution were of a kind that were liable to induce feelings of humiliation and resentment which can only have been exacerbated by the willingness of the police to give false evidence in support of an unjustified prosecution.

(j) The party has forged or presented misleading or false evidence on government forms or supporting documents to obtain or attempt to obtain a passport, a visa, travel documents, a social security card, a driver's license, or other government - issued identification card or has made a misrepresentation to the United States government;