Sentences with phrase «false interpretations of»

As far as I can tell, atheists promote all honest science, and indeed go so far as to protect it against bad and false interpretations of fact, such as creationism.

It will be polemic in the sense that we shall combat what seem to us false interpretations of our faith, and consequent false analyses of our world and of our duties in it.

Whitehead explicitly remarks that this is the false interpretation of overintellectualized philosophers dominated by logical concerns.

Another false interpretation of «fulfillment» is the claim that the people of the Old Testament era lived by promise, while Christians possess the reality itself.

That is the permanent Platonic temptation to a false interpretation of Christianity.

His fellow Jesuits were rankled by a 1972 interview he gave to Vatican Radio that said religious orders had succumbed to «decadence» stemming from «a false interpretation of Vatican II.»

You totally miss my point and instead respond to your false interpretation of it when you assume that I don't believe in right or wrong.

This is a false interpretation of successful

The details of the opinion should also be read and understood by all authorities who have jurisdiction over inspections or investigations of kennels and where there is any false interpretation of the law as to how dogs should be viewed and treated.

Not exact matches

It's interesting that you bring up this idea of Islam and Judaism both have their texts held above commentary and interpretation, when that's patently false.

Like I was saying, cherry - picking interpretations that conflict with the overarching comprehensive purpose of the Bible are a sure sign of false doctrine coming from fallen minds, even if it comes from someone professing to be «Christian».

There is no immorality in the verses you quoted, there is a lot of misuse and false interpretation by atheist types on those verses.

Many seminarians will become pastors who are either cynical about the gap between the «true» and the «false» church or who quickly jettison their theology and settle down with «things as they are» in the congregation, offering the congregation no better interpretation of its common life than the mere need for organizational maintenance.

In order to answer these false interpretations the Cardinal called for a rediscovery of the legacy of Christian anthropology.

Cardinal Ruini spoke of «false interpretations» of cosmic and biological evolution which «contribute more than a little to a purely naturalistic understanding of man» and which also lead to «the denial of the existence of a personal God distinct from the world» and the denial of «the transcendence of the human subject, made in the image and likeness of God».

I come to wonder, if what we read out of scripture needs a proper interpretation of it following some basic principals to be in the proper context and we don't follow those simple rules, then what we interpret creates in our minds a false will of God and we follow this so called «Gods will» are we going down the wrong path?

There are statements in Amoris Laetitia which, although they admit of a true interpretation, more easily suggest a false one, and are likely to be used to subvert the teachings of the Church.

Thus, given Mays's understanding of the relation of the formal and empirical sides of speculative philosophy in Whitehead, if we were to discover that our abstract system was false under the interpretation of «our concrete spatio - temporal scheme» (PW 32/25), we would not conclude that the system was false, rather that we must look elsewhere for an interpretation or a model under which it is true.

Thus, any false interpretation that might arise if there were but two persons — master and servant, day and night, or even sexual connotations — are set aside by the presence of three.

Just as a dyadic quality of truth is subsumed within the triadic quality of interpretation, so assertions within a culture are true or false only within the culture.

Because the very meaning of representing an object with a sign in a certain respect is a function of the larger culture, one can not speak of true or false interpretations except insofar as those interpretations are embedded in some culture or other.

is nothing new starting at the very begining with the New Testament books describing the similar false interpretations by men with huge egos and agendas just like those of today... nothing new.

Martin Luther presented the theology of Sola scriptura that the bible is the sole source to live and understand what Christianity is all about... but the bible itself does not come with a table of contents to prove that it is correct which is why the bible itself says that the CHURCH is the pillar and foundation of truth... remember that the church existed before even the bible was even put together... To understand the bible you cant just rely on your own interpretation like the protestants often say... The truth is always absolute and hence the teachings of the bible HAS to be absolute which is why the church is said to be ONE in nature (in every sense of the word), HOLY, CATHOLIC (Universal in teaching in every corner of the world) and APOSTOLIC (roots dating back to Jesus himself)... Now figure out what is that one church... The church put together the bible and the holy spirit always protected the church against false teachings and 1600 years later came about the teaching of Sola Scriptura... Protestants... look within and see whats wrong with this teaching.

While the Bible isn't flawed, our interpretations of it often are; while God is always true, human beings are often false.

It is the kind of ignorance that perceives the partial and proclaims it to be the whole; that is unaware of its own subjectivity and therefore makes and repeats false and prejudicial assumptions; that can not separate the truth of experience from the interpretation of that experience.

So god was NOT guiding the publication and therefore, there may be hundreds of false interpretations from the hundreds of Men transcribing for hundreds of years!

Is such a superior - degree - of - divinity Christology not one of the false interpretations previously considered in Christian history and rejected?

Since you have the «one» correct interpretation of the Bible, you obviously need your own blog rather than trying to take over someone elses and in the process call the writer of that blog and many of the people who comment there false teachers and other demeaning terms.

One is a false kind of objectivity that views the world, language, and interpretation as fixed (Brueggemann).

Niebuhr used the symbol of the devil to explain the false interpretation by which man is tempted.

Because we disagree on the proper method of baptism, the role of women in the church or the proper interpretation of a certain Biblical passage does not make one of us correct and the other a «false teacher».

The other 8 are not part of our laws, unless you take a very loose interpretation to see a correlation between purgery and thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

According to Johnson, «the synthetic picture of Jesus that Meier begins to advance in this volume... owes more than a little to a process of false inference, and to the contribution made by the Gospel narratives and interpretations that [Meier's] method began by explicitly eschewing.»

The idea that Linus, Cletus, Clement, and the rest were successors of Peter is of course a retrospective interpretation from the vantage point of a later stage in church history, but this does not mean that it is false.

In September, Time magazine organized a debate between Collins and Dawkins which touched on all the crucial issues: the false idea that science and faith should be held as not overlapping; the place of Darwinian evolution in the plan of God; the fine - tuning of the physical constants of nature; the literal interpretation of Genesis; the place of miracles including the incarnation and the resurrection of Jesus; and the origin of the moral law within the human heart.

The Bible presupposes a right and a wrong interpretation of Jesus» coming and the nature and character of God, as it uses strong language against false teachers who promote doctrines that undermine the gospel.

Not only does Siemon - Netto think these charges are false, but he believes that interpretations and actions based on stereotypical thinking about» The Fabricated Luther» have contributed to the real catastrophes of the twentieth century.

Accordingly, what from one set of notions may appear to be facts of experience that must be included within any adequate philosophy may seem, from another metaphysical point of view, simply a false verbal interpretation of the real facts (PR 16 - 18).

It is said to have had «the unfortunate and dangerous effect of lulling adherents of the traditional approach into a false sense of security regarding the adequacy of the interpretations they have arrived at by means of that approach» (60).

This will mean making clear the authentic interpretation of the teaching of the faith, challenging false interpretations, and may mean re-examination of traditional teaching in the current socio - historical context.

For example, if it was proved beyond any doubt that the universe was not created in six days then this would mean that an interpretation of Genesis to the contrary would be false.

First off, her interpretation of creation is utterly false and has not been held as viable by any established form of the church.

And once that idea has been implanted in her soul, the poison of a false interpretation can be counted on to do its work.

«Not true,» Paladino says of any false interpretation that he's softening his push to his criteria met.

Based on years of research on how such false memories are planted, Loftus has found they can result from patients undergoing types of psychotherapy, including hypnosis and sexualized dream interpretation popular in the 1990s, or when false information is slipped into a conversation following a highly stressful interrogation or event.

Lives have been destroyed over this incendiary issue — either those of the trauma victims (in one interpretation), left to wait decades for justice because of the workings of memory, or, in the counterview, those of the victims of false accusations, consumed in this season's witch - hunt.

Greenwashing — making false claims about the environmental virtues of a product or service — is exacerbated by confusion about the meaning and interpretation of labels in the green - products industry.

Have them write their idiom across the top of the left side of the page with an illustration of the false interpretation that might be made by somebody hearing the expression for the first time; on the other side of the page, students should draw an illustration of what the expression actually means.

Two kinds of errors of interpretation are possible when classifying teachers based on value - added: a) «false identifications» of teachers who are actually above a certain percentile but who are mistakenly classified as below it; and b) «false non-identifications» of teachers who are actually below a certain percentile but who are classified as above it.

Against this revisionist tradition, an essay by Michael Kimmelman, chief art critic of The New York Times, called Revisiting the Revisionists: The Modern, Its Critics and the Cold War, argues that much of this information (as well as the revisionists» interpretation of it) concerning what was happening on the American art scene during the 1940s and 50s is flatly false, or at best (contrary to the revisionists» avowed historiographic principles) decontextualized.