Over the short - term, unfortunately, there is no assurance that investors or analysts will quickly recognize that this market is trading on the basis of
false premises about earnings and valuation (though my impression is that those who wake up based on reasoned argument and evidence will be better off than those who wake up based on investment losses).
Not exact matches
There is much that could be said
about this, but I will stick with one thing, based on discussion at
about the 2 minute mark: When atheists insist that atheism does not drive behavior, and then then campaign on behalf of atheism, ridicule religion and religious believers in the name of atheism, seek to change laws in favor of their atheistic positions, recommend the extermination of religion, and practice falsehoods like Dawkins's in support of atheism, they prove that their atheism drives their behavior and that their
premise is
false, disingenuous, and (as far as I can tell) useless for anything but giving atheism rhetorical cover from being implicated in atheists» atrocities.
The interesting thing
about accepting the
premise of supernatural being (s), is that you can apply perfect logic to a
false premise and the conclusions will almost always be
false.
Your
premises are
false, and to think that the universe in some way cares
about you because it is intelligent is farcical..
However, if we now agree that
Premise X is only metaphysically
false (and not logically
false), i.e., if we agree that it is only metaphysically impossible (and not logically impossible) for one being's activities to be completely determined by another, given the analysis of «X is omnipotent» with which we have been working, there would be no apparent reason for supposing that it is not within the power of an omnipotent being to completely determine each of the activities of all other beings and thus to bring
about a world devoid of evil.
It is an obvious and extreme example of just what I am talking
about; an ignorant straw man and
false premise on which you base your counter argument.
In the first part of this article series, I talked
about the flawed logic behind the purported benefits of «loosened muscles» and «deeper stretching,» while in the second article I discussed how spinal flexibility isn't necessarily a desired outcome and that the main
premise behind hot yoga — that it burns more calories than exercise in a room of normal temperature — is completely
false.
Many people attribute
false alarms to equipment malfunction when, in reality, a lot of them are
about premises management.
If you have a high incidence of
false alarms in your educational
premises you may want to think
about how it not only uses the time and resources of your staff but also that of the local Fire and Rescue Services.
More
about bicycle backlash: Battle Of The Bikelanes: The Extended Version The Battle Of The Bike Lanes Is The Talk Of New York Motorists Versus Cyclists: A
False War Based on a
False Premise
The allegations are based on the
false premise that ExxonMobil reached definitive conclusions
about anthropogenic climate change before the world's experts and before the science itself had matured, and then withheld it from the broader scientific community.
I see a lot of people talking
about heat and temperature as if they're the same thing here, then basing their arguments on that
false premise.